Is this meteorite a piece of Mercury?

February 4, 2013 by Jason Major, Universe Today
The largest fragment of meteorite NWA 7325. (Credit: Stefan Ralew / sr-meteorites.de

Pieces of the Moon and Mars have been found on Earth before, as well as chunks of Vesta and other asteroids, but what about the innermost planet, Mercury? That's where some researchers think this greenish meteorite may have originated, based on its curious composition and the most recent data from NASA's MESSENGER spacecraft.

NWA 7325 is the name for a fall that was spotted in southern Morocco in 2012, comprising 35 fragments totaling about 345 grams. The dark green stones were purchased by meteorite dealer Stefan Ralew (who operates the retail site SR Meteorites) who immediately made note of their deep colors and lustrous, glassy exteriors.

Is this meteorite a piece of Mercury?

Ralew sent samples of NWA 7325 to researcher Anthony Irving of the University of Washington, a specialist in meteorites of planetary origin. Irving found that the fragments contained surprisingly little iron but considerable amounts of magnesium, aluminum, and calcium silicates—in line with what's been observed by MESSENGER in the surface crust of Mercury.

And even though the ratio of calcium silicates is higher than what's found on Mercury today, Irving speculates that NWA 7325 could have come from a deeper part of Mercury's crust, excavated by a powerful and launched into space, eventually finding their way to Earth.

In addition, exposure to for an unknown period of time and shock from its formation could have altered the meteorite's composition somewhat, making it not exactly match up with measurements from MESSENGER. If this is indeed a piece of our Solar System's innermost planet, it will be the first Mercury meteorite ever confirmed.

But the only way to know for sure, according to Irving's team's paper, is further studies on the fragments and, ultimately, sample returns from Mercury.

Irving's team's findings on NWA 7325 will be presented at the 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference to be held in Houston, TX, on March 18-22.

Explore further: MESSENGER Returns Images from Oct. 6 Mercury Fly-By

Related Stories

MESSENGER Returns Images from Oct. 6 Mercury Fly-By

October 7, 2008

MESSENGER is the first mission sent to orbit the planet closest to the sun. On Oct. 6, 2008, at roughly 4:40 a.m. ET, MESSENGER flew by Mercury for the second time this year. During the encounter, the probe swung just 125 ...

MESSENGER data paints new picture of Mercury's magnetic field

September 30, 2011

A University of British Columbia geophysicist is part of a NASA mission that is analyzing the first sets of data being collected by MESSENGER as it orbits Mercury. The spacecraft is capturing new evidence that challenges ...

Characterizing the surface composition of Mercury

September 17, 2012

The MESSENGER spacecraft, which has been orbiting Mercury since March 2011, has been revealing new information about the surface chemistry and geological history of the innermost planet in the solar system.

First meteorite linked to Martian crust

January 3, 2013

After extensive analyses by a team of scientists led by Carl Agee at the University of New Mexico, researchers have identified a new class of Martian meteorite that likely originated from the Mars's crust. It is also the ...

Recommended for you

Born-again planetary nebula

July 28, 2015

Beneath the vivid hues of this eye-shaped cloud, named Abell 78, a tale of stellar life and death is unfolding. At the centre of the nebula, a dying star – not unlike our Sun – which shed its outer layers on its way to ...

The search for molecular oxygen among cosmic oxygen atoms

July 27, 2015

Oxygen is the third most abundant element in the universe (after hydrogen and helium) and of course it is important: all known life forms require liquid water and its oxygen content. For over thirty years, astronomers have ...

Hubble looks in on a galactic nursery

July 27, 2015

This dramatic image shows the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope's view of dwarf galaxy known as NGC 1140, which lies 60 million light-years away in the constellation of Eridanus. As can be seen in this image NGC 1140 has an ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sinister1811
2.2 / 5 (10) Feb 04, 2013
Very interesting. Although most of these meteorites from Mercury would fall inwards towards the sun, there's no doubt that the odd one here and there could escape into outer orbits and possibly end up on Earth, though the chances are pretty slim.
Szkeptik
5 / 5 (2) Feb 04, 2013
Very interesting. Although most of these meteorites from Mercury would fall inwards towards the sun, there's no doubt that the odd one here and there could escape into outer orbits and possibly end up on Earth, though the chances are pretty slim.


Well, most asteroids would impact its far side, so what ever flies out will probably do so towards higher orbits. However to make it to Earth's orbit it would need to acquire an impressive amount of extra orbital velocity.
meta-atem
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 04, 2013
Very interesting. Although most of these meteorites from Mercury would fall inwards towards the sun, there's no doubt that the odd one here and there could escape into outer orbits and possibly end up on Earth, though the chances are pretty slim.


Well, most asteroids would impact its far side, so what ever flies out will probably do so towards higher orbits. However to make it to Earth's orbit it would need to acquire an impressive amount of extra orbital velocity.


Or launched into a fortuitous orbit that it could gain velocity from close encounters with the sun.
antialias_physorg
4.2 / 5 (5) Feb 04, 2013
Or launched into a fortuitous orbit that it could gain velocity from close encounters with the sun.

If you start with a certain velocity relative to the sun at a certain orbit then no matter which path you take around the sun you will not end up with more velocity when you hit that orbital distance again (swing by maneuvers don't work with the sun - only against bodies that move relative to the sun).

If that piece came from Mercury then it must have gotten the kinetic energy required to reach Earth orbit in the initial impact which hurled it off into space (or with a secondary impact along the way - which is rather unlikely)
meta-atem
2.3 / 5 (3) Feb 04, 2013
If you start with a certain velocity relative to the sun at a certain orbit then no matter which path you take around the sun you will not end up with more velocity when you hit that orbital distance again (swing by maneuvers don't work with the sun - only against bodies that move relative to the sun).

If that piece came from Mercury then it must have gotten the kinetic energy required to reach Earth orbit in the initial impact which hurled it off into space (or with a secondary impact along the way - which is rather unlikely)


Of course, I knew that (doh!). So then perhaps additional encounters with Mercury and eventually Venus? Is serendepity a valid variable when doing orbital mechanics?
Q-Star
3.4 / 5 (5) Feb 04, 2013
Of course, I knew that (doh!). So then perhaps additional encounters with Mercury and eventually Venus? Is serendepity a valid variable when doing orbital mechanics?


No serendipity is not a valid variable. That is why he took the trouble to doubt whether a secondary impact encounter might have happened. Anything that might have altered the trajectory after the initial conditions (at impact) would have been serendipitous.

The most likely initial condition was an impact which imparted enough momentum for it to later collide with Earth.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.