Facebook wins German court fight on fake names ban

Feb 15, 2013

(AP)—Facebook has won a court battle against a German privacy watchdog that challenged the social networking site's policy requiring users to register with their real names.

Schleswig-Holstein state's data protection body said Friday it will appeal the court decision. It argues the ban on fake names breaches German privacy laws and European rules designed to protect free speech online.

The administrative court in northern German Schleswig argued in its ruling Thursday that German privacy laws weren't applicable because has its European headquarters in Ireland—which has less far-reaching rules.

The California-based company argues its real name policy protects users.

Germany's strict privacy rules have posed a legal headache for Facebook, and others in recent years, giving consumers significant rights to limit the way companies use their information.

Explore further: White House updating online privacy policy

5 /5 (2 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

German official: Facebook must delete faces (Update)

Aug 15, 2012

(AP) — A German data protection official called Wednesday for social networking site Facebook to delete biometric profiles of people stored without their explicit consent, saying they breach European privacy rules.

Facebook updates data use policy to give more info

May 11, 2012

(AP) -- Facebook is updating its data use policy in an attempt to give users more clarity on how the information they share is used by the company. The move comes a week ahead of its expected initial public offering of stock.

German rules against YouTube in rights case

Apr 20, 2012

(AP) -- A German court has ruled that online video platform YouTube must install filters to prevent users from uploading some music videos whose rights are held by a music-royalties collecting body.

Recommended for you

White House updating online privacy policy

3 hours ago

A new Obama administration privacy policy out Friday explains how the government will gather the user data of online visitors to WhiteHouse.gov, mobile apps and social media sites. It also clarifies that ...

Net neutrality balancing act

22 hours ago

Researchers in Italy, writing in the International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management have demonstrated that net neutrality benefits content creator and consumers without compromising provider innovation nor pr ...

Twitter rules out Turkey office amid tax row

Apr 16, 2014

Social networking company Twitter on Wednesday rejected demands from the Turkish government to open an office there, following accusations of tax evasion and a two-week ban on the service.

How does false information spread online?

Apr 16, 2014

Last summer the World Economic Forum (WEF) invited its 1,500 council members to identify top trends facing the world, including what should be done about them. The WEF consists of 80 councils covering a wide range of issues including social media. Members come ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

frajo
not rated yet Feb 15, 2013
Actually I don't understand the court's decision. A company is allowed to disobeye German law in Germany because the law elsewhere differs?
Otoh, I welcome this strange decision because it lessens facebooks attractiveness.
ShotmanMaslo
1 / 5 (1) Feb 16, 2013
Actually I don't understand the court's decision. A company is allowed to disobeye German law in Germany because the law elsewhere differs?


Facebook is not German, so German privacy laws do not apply. Thats how I understand the decision, and it makes sense that way.
frajo
not rated yet Feb 17, 2013
Actually I don't understand the court's decision. A company is allowed to disobeye German law in Germany because the law elsewhere differs?


Facebook is not German, so German privacy laws do not apply. Thats how I understand the decision, and it makes sense that way.

So it would make sense to you when a German [Chinese, ...] company operating in the US were allowed to disobeye US privacy law because US privacy law doesn't apply?
ShotmanMaslo
not rated yet Feb 18, 2013
So it would make sense to you when a German [Chinese, ...] company operating in the US were allowed to disobeye US privacy law because US privacy law doesn't apply?


Well, yes. When they are registered in another country, then applying national laws can be very problematic, especially when dealing with internet services that are really global.

More news stories

Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers

(Phys.org) —Four freshmen at the University of Pennsylvania have taken Apple's personal assistant Siri to behave as a graduate-level executive assistant which, when asked, is capable of adjusting the temperature ...

Venture investments jump to $9.5B in 1Q

Funding for U.S. startup companies soared 57 percent in the first quarter to a level not seen since 2001, as venture capitalists piled more money into an increasing number of deals, according to a report due out Friday.

White House updating online privacy policy

A new Obama administration privacy policy out Friday explains how the government will gather the user data of online visitors to WhiteHouse.gov, mobile apps and social media sites. It also clarifies that ...

Male monkey filmed caring for dying mate (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) —The incident was captured by Dr Bruna Bezerra and colleagues in the Atlantic Forest in the Northeast of Brazil.  Dr Bezerra is a Research Associate at the University of Bristol and a Professor ...

Scientists tether lionfish to Cayman reefs

Research done by U.S. scientists in the Cayman Islands suggests that native predators can be trained to gobble up invasive lionfish that colonize regional reefs and voraciously prey on juvenile marine creatures.