Models move from brain to rain

Feb 07, 2013 by Pete Wilton
Models move from brain to rain
Photo of a monsoon in Mumbai. Credit: Planemad via Wikimedia Commons.

(Phys.org)—One of climate scientists' key ambitions is to predict future climate change more accurately. They create incredibly detailed computer models, but even these cannot calculate all the infinite detail of the real climate.

The inevitable approximations they have to make mean that when it comes to rainfall - one of the most important, yet tricky, aspects of - different models seem to say very different things.

But what if, fundamentally, they're not so different? 

What if they all agree that a will become wetter in future years; it's just that they disagree on the time of year that the monsoon will appear and where exactly it tends to pass over?

'Each is a bit like a photograph of the same object taken from a slightly different angle,' Adam Levy from Oxford University's Department of Physics tells me. 'If you simply overlaid them they wouldn't match up in many places, but if you can adjust for the different perspectives – of monsoons coming a month or two earlier or later or shifting a bit further south or north - many of the differences between models might just melt away.'

Adam is part of an Oxford University team that recently reported in a new way of applying techniques used to analyse to climate models. 

In , researchers use to work out the relationships between anatomical regions of the brain that can look different in different patients – something that needs to be adjusted for so that the images 'fit' and they can spot common symptoms or patterns.

In their new approach the Oxford team applied these techniques to 14 of the latest , first transforming the historical simulations generated by these models so that they lined up better with observations, and then applying these transforms to the models' predictions to see how this affected their agreement on future rainfall. 

To do this, the team have worked in collaboration with medical image analysis researchers in the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB).

'Climate models seem to disagree about rainfall quite a lot, which is a huge problem, as changes in rainfall will have bigger human impact than many other aspects of . What we found, though, was that when we transformed the models using our technique, was that we had managed to iron out a substantial part of the disagreement,' Adam explains.

The transformation increased agreement between the models by an average of 15%, although some areas saw more benefits than others. Overall there was increased agreement across 66% of the globe about rainfall patterns. This first test run used an extreme climate scenario in which unabated carbon dioxide emissions have quadrupled atmospheric levels. However, the plan is to apply the technique to more realistic and subtle simulated scenarios.

The team are currently working on dedicated software which takes into account the many ways that climate models differ from brains - for instance in being wrapped around a sphere as opposed to a 3D 'image' of a subject's brain - to create tools tailored to this new application.

'The long-term goal is to be able to make accurate predictions of how climate change will affect average rainfall at a given time, at a given location on the globe,' says Adam.

Such techniques could give us a much clearer picture of what climate models are really saying about how rainfall patterns are likely to change – and this could help to ease the strain on the brains of policy makers trying to plan for our planet's future.  

Explore further: Cordilleran terrane collage

More information: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… 012GL053964/abstract

Related Stories

Climate change and the South Asian summer monsoon

Jun 24, 2012

The vagaries of South Asian summer monsoon rainfall impact the lives of more than one billion people. A review in Nature Climate Change (June 24 online issue) of over 100 recent research articles concludes that w ...

Modern physics is critical to global warming research

Mar 11, 2008

Science has come a long way with predicting climate. Increasingly sophisticated models and instruments can zero in on a specific storm formation or make detailed weather forecasts – all useful to our daily ...

Geoengineering could disrupt rainfall patterns

Jun 06, 2012

A geoengineering solution to climate change could lead to significant rainfall reduction in Europe and North America, a team of European scientists concludes. The researchers studied how models of the Earth ...

New model to assess urban water security

Dec 02, 2010

University of Adelaide water engineering researchers have developed a model to estimate potential urban water supply shortfalls under a range of climate change scenarios.

Recommended for you

Cordilleran terrane collage

7 hours ago

In the August 2014 issue of Lithosphere, Steve Israel of the Yukon Geological Survey and colleagues provide conclusions regarding the North American Cordillera that they say "are provocative in that they b ...

NASA sees Tropical Storm Halong's 'best side'

9 hours ago

NASA satellite data showed Tropical Storm Halong's "best side" or most powerful side was east of its center. That's where the coldest cloud top temperatures and strongest thunderstorms appeared on satellite ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ricarguy
2.1 / 5 (7) Feb 07, 2013
...first transforming the historical simulations generated by these models so that they lined up better with observations...


All the 14 models' results are fudged so they work "better", and the IPCC says climate change being man-made is as certain as Newtonian gravity? The latter conclusion seems just a little too simplistic, doesn't it?
The Alchemist
1.8 / 5 (4) Feb 07, 2013
Climate models seem to disagree about rainfall quite a lot, which is a huge problem, as changes in rainfall will have bigger human impact than many other aspects of climate change.

It is so funny; it was only a few years ago my edits were rejected on wiki for saying the same thing, and for stating water was a very important Greenhouse gas. (They didn't like me referencing chemical/physical properties rather than journal articles-couldn't find the original, oh, late 1800 prints.)
It you want a simple, intuitive and predictive model, apply this one-
http://www.facebo...4557455/
It has worked perfectly for 30 years. More if you "predict" the past.
The Alchemist
2 / 5 (5) Feb 07, 2013
Hey ricarguy-Intuitively, it is almost inconceivable that we are not changing the climate. We've created cities that stretch as far as the eye can see-that must affect the climate. We release over ten nukes worth of energy every day from the need for power (translated to heat)-that seems like it would affect the climate. I've heard Australia was a rainforest once, and the aboriginal people destroyed it... Termites are said to be important, how can we not be?
The Alchemist
1.8 / 5 (5) Feb 07, 2013
http://www.facebook.com/#!/groups/454689344557455/
It has worked perfectly for 30 years. More if you "predict" the past.

With some work you could create a ratio of past present states the might be able to predict rainfall... It was designed to predict regional climate, but I'll have to check.