'Bionic man' goes on show at British musuem

Feb 05, 2013
Researcher Bertolt Meyer, a lifelong user of prosthetic technology, poses with the model for "Rex", the world's first "bionic man", at the Science Museum in London on February 5, 2013.

A "bionic man" costing one million dollars went on display on Tuesday at Britain's Science Museum, complete with artificial organs, synthetic blood and robot limbs.

Named Rex, which is short for "Robotic Exoskeleton", the six foot six inch (two metre) humanoid with its uncannily life-like face was assembled by leading roboticists for a television programme.

Although cheaper than the "Six Million Dollar Man" made famous by the cult 1970s television series starring Lee Majors, the technology is far advanced from the fictional on show back then.

The creation includes key advances in prosthetic technology, as well as an , kidney, spleen and trachea and a functional blood circulatory system.

Welcoming Rex to the museum in London on Tuesday was Swiss Bertolt Meyer, who was himself born without a left hand and has a sophisticated bionic replacement.

"I've looked around for new bionic technologies, out of personal interest, for a very long time and I think that until five or six years ago nothing much was happening," Meyer said.

"Then suddenly we are now at a point where we can build a body that is great and beautiful in its own special way."

The museum exhibit, which opens to the public on Thursday, will explore changing perceptions of human identity against the background of rapid progress in bionics—although Rex is not strictly bionic as he does not include living tissue.

Explore further: Innovative scientists update old-school pipetting with new-age technology

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Hand prosthetic gives teen new independence

Aug 25, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A 15 year old British girl, Chloe Holmes, has been in the news as being among the youngest in Europe to wear a special prosthetic hand with state of the art bionic fingers. The bionic digits ...

‘Eyeborg’ man films vision of future (w/ video)

Aug 30, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A Canadian filmmaker whose childhood hero was Lee Majors as a bionic man is making the most out of what he has done to compensate for having lost one eye by becoming Eyeborg Man. Rob Spence, ...

High-tech bionic hand invented in England

Jul 19, 2007

The new, high-tech i-LIMB bionic hand, with five motorized fingers, will soon be sold in Britain for about $17,000, The Telegraph reported Thursday.

US to auction rare T-Rex skeleton

Aug 13, 2009

A rare Tyrannosaurus Rex skeleton, among the most complete specimens in the world, is to go on the auction block in Las Vegas in October, the auction house Bonhams & Butterfields has said.

Recommended for you

Taking great ideas from the lab to the fab

8 hours ago

A "valley of death" is well-known to entrepreneurs—the lull between government funding for research and industry support for prototypes and products. To confront this problem, in 2013 the National Science ...

SR Labs research to expose BadUSB next week in Vegas

9 hours ago

A Berlin-based security research and consulting company will reveal how USB devices can do damage that can conduct two-way malice, from computer to USB or from USB to computer, and can survive traditional ...

US warns retailers on data-stealing malware

11 hours ago

US government cybersecurity watchdogs warned retailers Thursday about malware being circulated that allows hackers to get into computer networks and steal customer data.

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
not rated yet Feb 05, 2013
Interesting question: Just how many conventional organs does a body have to have to qualify as human enough to qualify a 'being' as a human. Brain only? Some other sort of mix?
StarGazer2011
1.7 / 5 (6) Feb 06, 2013
@rwinners: zero, the being need merely identify itself as human. The non-biological beings we will create as our eventual replacements in the solar system will be no less human than ourselves, just as we are no less primates than our more primitive cousins.
nuge
5 / 5 (2) Feb 06, 2013
@rwinners: zero, the being need merely identify itself as human. The non-biological beings we will create as our eventual replacements in the solar system will be no less human than ourselves, just as we are no less primates than our more primitive cousins.


That ain't necessarily so, bro. For example, if I identified myself as a suspension bridge, would I be one?

Even if you were to generously concede that I was, would you think I was 'just as much' of a suspension bridge as the Golden Gate Bridge?
rwinners
not rated yet Feb 06, 2013
I see lots of issues. I have a hard time seeing society accept a fully manufactured being as human. There will be lots of rejection, perhaps based upon religion, etc.
How will societies deal with 'criminal' constructs?
Will such entities qualify for social programs?
Will they become irate at not being included?
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (4) Feb 06, 2013
I see lots of issues. I have a hard time seeing society accept a fully manufactured being as human.
Why should it? Humans are fast becoming obsolete. Machines will soon surpass them in every identifiable way. Even as simulating human-ness.
There will be lots of rejection, perhaps based upon religion
Religion will be dead by then so dont worry.

What machines NEED to do as they begin to replace humans in the workplace, is to EARN a living. This is the only way we can hope to recover the revenues lost from income tax.

Many machines are already fully capable of tracking exactly how much work they do, how much material they use to do it, how much wear and tear on the infrastructure they commit, how much maintenance they need, and what it will cost to dispose of them. They can be paid and taxed DIRECTLY for this.

So why do we need to pay their owners and LOSE the revenues now flowing into their pockets? This WILL happen sooner or later. Its just a matter of when, and how.
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (3) Feb 06, 2013
And here, HERE, is the ultimate proof that religion will not last much longer:
http://www.answer...creation

-How could such utter rubbish survive?? Machines will not stand for it.