Australia failing UNESCO demands on Barrier Reef

Feb 01, 2013 by Martin Parry
Bleaching on a coral reef near Halfway Island in Australia's Great Barrier Reef, October 2, 2012. Australia has insisted that protecting the Great Barrier Reef is a top priority, but conservation group WWF said not enough was being done to prevent UNESCO from deeming it a world heritage site "in danger".

Australia insisted Friday that protecting the Great Barrier Reef was a top priority, but conservationists WWF said not enough had been done to prevent UNESCO deeming it a world heritage site "in danger".

In June, UNESCO demanded decisive action from Australia to protect the world's largest coral reef from a gas and mining boom and increasing , or risk the embarrassment of seeing it put on the danger list.

The deadline it gave Canberra to outline how it planned to improve management and protection and meet key targets recommended by the World Heritage Committee ran out on Friday.

In releasing its response to UNESCO, Environment Minister Tony Burke said the government was "absolutely committed" to protecting the reef.

"We have made substantial progress in addressing the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee, including agreement to conduct one of the most comprehensive strategic assessments ever undertaken in Australia," he said.

He said the response highlighted Australia's "best practices in management and confirms our willingness to share our expertise with other countries experiencing similar conservation issues".

Burke said Canberra had already invested Aus$200 million (US$208 million) in a "Reef Rescue" programme and would provide an additional Aus$800,000 to fight the destructive crown-of-thorns starfish which is decimating the reef.

Graphic on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. Conservation group WWF says not enough had been done to prevent UNESCO from deeming the reef a world heritage site "in danger".

He added that assessment reports on future planning were being conducted to determine "where sustainable development can occur, the type of development that will be allowed and the conditions under which development may proceed".

But the WWF, along with the Australian Marine Conservation Society, said Australia had failed to show enough progress.

WWF campaign director Richard Leck said it had kept a scorecard on how the federal government and Queensland state government had responded to the World Heritage Committee's list of recommendations.

"The dismal scores highlight our grave concerns that UNESCO is going to have no option but to recommend the reef be put on its unenviable 'List of World Heritage in Danger'—the list of shame," Leck said.

"The impact of that would be felt right throughout Queensland's economy, especially its Aus$6.0 billion reef tourism industry. Australia's reputation is on the line."

WWF highlighted a recent push by Queensland to fast-track port development and weaken coastal protection laws as a major concern.

Australia is riding an unprecedented wave of resources investment due to booming demand from Asia, with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of resource projects in the pipeline.

Photo from an underwater camera used to map the iconic Great Barrier Reef, March 1, 2012. WWF highlighted a recent push by Australia to fast-track port development and weaken coastal protection laws as a major concern for the protection of the reef.

In June, UNESCO said the sheer number and scale of proposals, including liquefied natural gas, tourism and mining projects, could threaten the reef's status.

Declining water quality and climate change were major issues and it was "essential to reduce development and other pressures as much as possible to enable an increase in the reef's resilience", it said.

At the time Campbell Newman, premier of Queensland which is locally responsible for the , was combative, warning that "we are in the coal business".

"We will protect the environment but we are not going to see the economic future of Queensland shut down," he said.

The Committee will consider Australia's response at its annual meeting in Phnom Penh in June.

Explore further: Pact with devil? California farmers use oil firms' water

Related Stories

Great Barrier Reef heading for danger: UNESCO

Jun 02, 2012

UNESCO on Saturday urged decisive action from Australia to protect the Great Barrier Reef from a gas and mining boom, warning it risked being put on its list of world heritage sites deemed "in danger".

Outrage at drilling permit for Australia reef

Jul 08, 2011

Australian green activists expressed outrage at a government decision to allow energy giant Shell to drill for gas at a pristine reef that was listed as a World Heritage site just two weeks ago.

Australia admits neglect of Great Barrier Reef

Oct 03, 2012

The Australian government admits the Great Barrier Reef has been neglected for decades after a study showed it has lost more than half its coral cover in the past 27 years. ...

Australia PM critical of coal mine approval process

Jun 06, 2012

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has attacked Queensland officials over their handling of a massive Indian-led US$6.3 billion coal mine project, accusing them of risking investor confidence.

Chinese ship leaks oil in Great Barrier Reef zone

Apr 04, 2010

A Chinese coal carrier leaking oil in Australia's environmentally sensitive Great Barrier Reef Marine Park after running aground, could be in danger of breaking up, authorities warned Sunday.

Save our reef, save our heritage

Jul 19, 2007

Protecting the Great Barrier Reef from the impacts of climate change, natural disasters and rising human pressures will be a key test of Australia’s ability to keep our natural environment healthy and resilient.

Recommended for you

Research to aid Californian drought response

27 minutes ago

The worsening drought in California has prompted US agencies to turn to Australian researchers to identify the most effective strategies Australian utilities and agencies used to survive the Millennium Drought.

Stronger action needed to transform the UK's energy system

5 hours ago

An ambitious policy package is essential for the UK to transform its energy system to achieve the deep reductions in carbon emissions required to avoid dangerous climate change, according to research led by UCL scientists. ...

Gimmicks and technology: California learns to save water

Jul 03, 2015

Billboards and TV commercials, living room visits, guess-your-water-use booths, and awards for water stinginess—a wealthy swath of Orange County that once had one of the worst records for water conservation ...

Cities, regions call for 'robust' world climate pact

Jul 03, 2015

Thousands of cities, provinces and states from around the world urged national governments on Thursday to deliver a "robust, binding, equitable and universal" planet-saving climate pact in December.

Will climate change put mussels off the menu?

Jul 03, 2015

Climate change models predict that sea temperatures will rise significantly, including in the tropics. In these areas, rainfall is also predicted to increase, reducing the salt concentration of the surface ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.1 / 5 (11) Feb 01, 2013
As always, corporate money grubbing will destroy the environment. It angers me how someone so selfish and incompetent is in charge of protecting something that he doesn't even consider a priority. This is the Great Barrier Reef. The only one of its kind in existence. Needless to say, I have no more faith in the QLD government to protect it, especially after so many broken promises.
2.3 / 5 (6) Feb 01, 2013
Australians in general has never really cared about the special nature of the their animals or the reefs.

The fact they have more species on the red list than the ENTIRE world combined is pretty damning.

There are less than 25,000,000 Australians.

There are 1.3 billion Chinese

There are 1.2 billion Indians.

Guess which country no longer has its native "tiger"? (marsupial or placental).

Quantas saved the Koala from the a Govt' supported fur trade driven extinction.

Aussie farmers and ranchers make our American wildlife intolerant ranchers and farmers look compassionate in comparison.

Their latest is having the farm/ranch funded animal wildlife dept of the NW Terr. put a stop to the successful cane toad hunts by the Aborigines because they they were using "cruel" methods to kill the toad, but the real reason was they were counting on the toad to "naturally" drive endangered native species extinct and open up land off limits to protect them.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.