Australia failing UNESCO demands on Barrier Reef

Feb 01, 2013 by Martin Parry
Bleaching on a coral reef near Halfway Island in Australia's Great Barrier Reef, October 2, 2012. Australia has insisted that protecting the Great Barrier Reef is a top priority, but conservation group WWF said not enough was being done to prevent UNESCO from deeming it a world heritage site "in danger".

Australia insisted Friday that protecting the Great Barrier Reef was a top priority, but conservationists WWF said not enough had been done to prevent UNESCO deeming it a world heritage site "in danger".

In June, UNESCO demanded decisive action from Australia to protect the world's largest coral reef from a gas and mining boom and increasing , or risk the embarrassment of seeing it put on the danger list.

The deadline it gave Canberra to outline how it planned to improve management and protection and meet key targets recommended by the World Heritage Committee ran out on Friday.

In releasing its response to UNESCO, Environment Minister Tony Burke said the government was "absolutely committed" to protecting the reef.

"We have made substantial progress in addressing the recommendations made by the World Heritage Committee, including agreement to conduct one of the most comprehensive strategic assessments ever undertaken in Australia," he said.

He said the response highlighted Australia's "best practices in management and confirms our willingness to share our expertise with other countries experiencing similar conservation issues".

Burke said Canberra had already invested Aus$200 million (US$208 million) in a "Reef Rescue" programme and would provide an additional Aus$800,000 to fight the destructive crown-of-thorns starfish which is decimating the reef.

Graphic on Australia's Great Barrier Reef. Conservation group WWF says not enough had been done to prevent UNESCO from deeming the reef a world heritage site "in danger".

He added that assessment reports on future planning were being conducted to determine "where sustainable development can occur, the type of development that will be allowed and the conditions under which development may proceed".

But the WWF, along with the Australian Marine Conservation Society, said Australia had failed to show enough progress.

WWF campaign director Richard Leck said it had kept a scorecard on how the federal government and Queensland state government had responded to the World Heritage Committee's list of recommendations.

"The dismal scores highlight our grave concerns that UNESCO is going to have no option but to recommend the reef be put on its unenviable 'List of World Heritage in Danger'—the list of shame," Leck said.

"The impact of that would be felt right throughout Queensland's economy, especially its Aus$6.0 billion reef tourism industry. Australia's reputation is on the line."

WWF highlighted a recent push by Queensland to fast-track port development and weaken coastal protection laws as a major concern.

Australia is riding an unprecedented wave of resources investment due to booming demand from Asia, with hundreds of billions of dollars worth of resource projects in the pipeline.

Photo from an underwater camera used to map the iconic Great Barrier Reef, March 1, 2012. WWF highlighted a recent push by Australia to fast-track port development and weaken coastal protection laws as a major concern for the protection of the reef.

In June, UNESCO said the sheer number and scale of proposals, including liquefied natural gas, tourism and mining projects, could threaten the reef's status.

Declining water quality and climate change were major issues and it was "essential to reduce development and other pressures as much as possible to enable an increase in the reef's resilience", it said.

At the time Campbell Newman, premier of Queensland which is locally responsible for the , was combative, warning that "we are in the coal business".

"We will protect the environment but we are not going to see the economic future of Queensland shut down," he said.

The Committee will consider Australia's response at its annual meeting in Phnom Penh in June.

Explore further: Green dream: Can UN summit revive climate issue?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Great Barrier Reef heading for danger: UNESCO

Jun 02, 2012

UNESCO on Saturday urged decisive action from Australia to protect the Great Barrier Reef from a gas and mining boom, warning it risked being put on its list of world heritage sites deemed "in danger".

Outrage at drilling permit for Australia reef

Jul 08, 2011

Australian green activists expressed outrage at a government decision to allow energy giant Shell to drill for gas at a pristine reef that was listed as a World Heritage site just two weeks ago.

Australia admits neglect of Great Barrier Reef

Oct 03, 2012

The Australian government admits the Great Barrier Reef has been neglected for decades after a study showed it has lost more than half its coral cover in the past 27 years. ...

Australia PM critical of coal mine approval process

Jun 06, 2012

Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard has attacked Queensland officials over their handling of a massive Indian-led US$6.3 billion coal mine project, accusing them of risking investor confidence.

Chinese ship leaks oil in Great Barrier Reef zone

Apr 04, 2010

A Chinese coal carrier leaking oil in Australia's environmentally sensitive Great Barrier Reef Marine Park after running aground, could be in danger of breaking up, authorities warned Sunday.

Save our reef, save our heritage

Jul 19, 2007

Protecting the Great Barrier Reef from the impacts of climate change, natural disasters and rising human pressures will be a key test of Australia’s ability to keep our natural environment healthy and resilient.

Recommended for you

Green dream: Can UN summit revive climate issue?

14 hours ago

Five years ago, the environment movement was in its heyday as politicians, actors, rock stars and protestors demanded a looming UN summit brake the juggernaut of climate change.

Rio's Olympic golf course in legal bunker

Sep 18, 2014

The return of golf to the Olympics after what will be 112 years by the time Rio hosts South America's first Games in 2016 comes amid accusations environmental laws were got round to build the facility in ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sinister1811
2.1 / 5 (11) Feb 01, 2013
As always, corporate money grubbing will destroy the environment. It angers me how someone so selfish and incompetent is in charge of protecting something that he doesn't even consider a priority. This is the Great Barrier Reef. The only one of its kind in existence. Needless to say, I have no more faith in the QLD government to protect it, especially after so many broken promises.
Jonseer
2.3 / 5 (6) Feb 01, 2013
Australians in general has never really cared about the special nature of the their animals or the reefs.

The fact they have more species on the red list than the ENTIRE world combined is pretty damning.

There are less than 25,000,000 Australians.

There are 1.3 billion Chinese

There are 1.2 billion Indians.

Guess which country no longer has its native "tiger"? (marsupial or placental).

Quantas saved the Koala from the a Govt' supported fur trade driven extinction.

Aussie farmers and ranchers make our American wildlife intolerant ranchers and farmers look compassionate in comparison.

Their latest is having the farm/ranch funded animal wildlife dept of the NW Terr. put a stop to the successful cane toad hunts by the Aborigines because they they were using "cruel" methods to kill the toad, but the real reason was they were counting on the toad to "naturally" drive endangered native species extinct and open up land off limits to protect them.