Academics grapple with balancing their research with the need to communicate it to the public

Feb 16, 2013

Researchers today more than ever focus their work on real-world problems, often times making their research relevant to the public locally, regionally and sometimes nationally. But engaging the public in their research can be a daunting task for researchers both professionally and personally.

Leah Gerber, an Arizona State University associate professor in the School of Life Sciences and a senior sustainability scientist in the School of Sustainability, has identified impediments to productive and she shared her recommendations at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Gerber's talk, "Confronting Institutional Barriers to Science Communication and Policy," was presented on Feb. 16.

As a researcher, Gerber and her group at ASU develop that bring together the best available scientific information to make rational, efficient conservation decisions about endangered species recovery, ecosystem management and reserve design for oceans and fisheries. Getting that information to the public is a key component in her work.

Gerber said barriers to communicating science include a lack of reward for engaging the public and decision-makers on science, limited communications training, and time pressures faculty members face while trying to obtain tenure. Other barriers include the researchers needing to prioritize their commitments, understanding the value in communicating their work to the public, and they may need to push their comfort zone (and stand in front of a camera, for example).

While the culture is slowly changing within academic institutions, success in higher education still is largely measured by publications and grants, which demand large amounts of time. Gerber says new institutional incentives need to be developed and implemented.

"We must find a way to make engagement rise to the top of the pile," Gerber said.

Gerber said some other institutional changes need to be made as well. For example, new accounting measures need to be developed for faculty who engage the public and their outreach work needs to be part of their evaluations (in addition to the standard grants and publications measures); communications training should become part of leadership programs for scientists; time should be given for professors to develop relationships with media; and boundary organizations should be developed, she said.

Explore further: History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study finds healthy seafood comes from sustainable fish

Aug 02, 2012

When ordering seafood, the options are many and so are some of the things you might consider in what you order. Is your fish healthy? Is it safe? Is it endangered? While there are many services and rankings offered to help ...

Handling rejection: New study sheds light on why it hurts

Dec 09, 2008

(PhysOrg.com) -- Rejection is one of those universal experiences we can all relate to. Whether it's family or social, through business or a romantic rejection, that feeling of exclusion, or a lack of acceptance, is something ...

Recommended for you

History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

Sep 16, 2014

As Texas mulls new history textbooks for its 5-plus million public school students, some academics are decrying lessons they say exaggerate the influence of Christian values on America's Founding Fathers.

Flatow, 'Science Friday' settle claims over grant

Sep 16, 2014

Federal prosecutors say radio host Ira Flatow and his "Science Friday" show that airs on many National Public Radio stations have settled civil claims that they misused money from a nearly $1 million federal ...

User comments : 0