White Republicans, Southern evangelicals most likely to claim reverse discrimination, research finds

Jan 24, 2013 by Max Mcclure
As the Supreme Court considers Fisher v. University of Texas, a so-called 'reverse discrimination' case, Stanford researchers have studied which white people were most likely to say they were discriminated against because of their race. Credit: Mesut Dogan / Shutterstock

With the affirmative action case Fisher v. University of Texas before the Supreme Court, "reverse discrimination" is back in the public eye.

Perceptions of reverse – so-called because it involves bias against whites, rather than against minorities – are not new, and have been building among American whites for decades. However, the phenomenon is little-studied, in part because some assume such claims by white Americans have little merit.

"We talk about whites who claim reverse discrimination a lot, but we don't often study them systematically, " said Stanford sociology Professor Aliya Saperstein. "The issue of reporting is such a loaded one. So, we were curious about who the white people were who would say out loud to a survey that they had been treated unfairly because of their race. What makes them different?"

Using data from a 2006 survey of American racial and religious diversity, Saperstein, along with fellow Damon Mayrl, found that the answer varies depending on where you are. In the South, the most likely discrimination reporters are evangelical Christians. Elsewhere, it's Republicans.

The reasons for this aren't ideological – the specifics of people's religious or seem to make no difference. Instead, the researchers suggest, Southern evangelical churches and the GOP are acting as regional communities for racially disaffected whites.

The findings show that common stereotypes of white people concerned with "reverse racism" – the of the "angry white male," for instance – are not the whole story. While the study shows whites who report racial discrimination are more likely to be recently unemployed and pessimistic about their future, they are also more likely to say they have daily contact with non-whites, and count at least one non-white person among their eight closest friends.

"You have to look beyond the simple view of who's claiming racial discrimination," said Mayrl, a professor at Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and first author on the study. "There is no singular profile of the white discrimination reporter."

The paper is currently available online ahead of publication in Social Science Research.

Real-world consequences

It's often difficult to say whether claims of discrimination are real or imagined. Still, the mere of racial prejudice can have real-world consequences.

For instance, Saperstein said, both whites and who feel racially discriminated against experience worsened mental and even physical health. Discrimination reporters have also been found to trust the government less and to experience more negative relationships with family members.

"Perceiving discrimination has a host of consequences for well-being," she said. "Not just for individuals, but for society as a whole. It almost doesn't matter whether they really experienced any unfair treatment; what matters is they believe they did."

Objectively real or not, the researchers found that 8 percent of whites nationwide said they had experienced racial discrimination in the past three years. This number was significantly higher in the South, jumping to 11 percent.

Southern evangelicals overrepresented

Particularly overrepresented among Southerners reporting racial discrimination were evangelical Protestants, who accounted for 60 percent of the reverse discrimination reports in the South.

Other sociologists have suggested a connection between evangelical Christianity's individualistic theology and how evangelicals understand racial inequality. But neither theology nor devotion – how often they prayed, how often they went to church – affects the likelihood of white Southern evangelicals reporting racial discrimination.

Instead, the researchers point to the church's historical role as a booster for the racial order of the Old South. Southern evangelical churches were involved in morally justifying slavery before the Civil War and in defending segregation well into the 20th century.

"Southern evangelical churches appear distinctive from churches elsewhere, and we think that has to do with how they have helped their members understand the racial order in the past," said Mayrl. "We're taking the focus a little off the theology and putting it on the social structures in which people live."

Republicans also regionally distinct

Outside the South, evangelicals were no more likely to report racial discrimination than any other group. Republicans, on the other hand – who report at average or below-average rates in the South – were significantly more likely to say they had been treated unfairly on the basis of their race.

The political conservatism of someone's beliefs did not help explain the likelihood that whites would perceive discrimination. Simply identifying as a member of the Republican Party was what mattered.

Why this regional difference?

The researchers point to the fact that, outside the South, evangelical churches developed a different approach to race relations than their Southern counterparts. Meanwhile, the Republican Party has actively pursued white voters who felt wronged by such policies as civil rights programs or affirmative action.

By serving as a haven for disaffected whites, the researchers say, the Republican Party outside the South may occupy the same institutional niche the evangelical church fills in the South.

"We can't say whether these organizations are simply more attractive to whites who feel they have experienced discrimination, or whether they actually encourage whites to understand their situation in terms of racial discrimination," said Mayrl. "But it's clear that white discrimination reporters find different communities of support in different parts of the country."

Explore further: Decoding ethnic labels

More information: www.sciencedirect.com/science/… ii/S0049089X12002578

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Discrimination may harm your health

Jan 12, 2012

Racial discrimination may be harmful to your health, according to new research from Rice University sociologists Jenifer Bratter and Bridget Gorman.

Recommended for you

Decoding ethnic labels

3 hours ago

If you are of Latin American descent, do you call yourself Chicano? Latino? Hispanic?

Local education politics 'far from dead'

Jul 29, 2014

Teach for America, known for recruiting teachers, is also setting its sights on capturing school board seats across the nation. Surprisingly, however, political candidates from the program aren't just pushing ...

First grade reading suffers in segregated schools

Jul 29, 2014

A groundbreaking study from the Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute (FPG) has found that African-American students in first grade experience smaller gains in reading when they attend segregated schools—but the ...

Why aren't consumers buying remanufactured products?

Jul 29, 2014

Firms looking to increase market share of remanufactured consumer products will have to overcome a big barrier to do so, according to a recent study from the Penn State Smeal College of Business. Findings from faculty members ...

Expecting to teach enhances learning, recall

Jul 29, 2014

People learn better and recall more when given the impression that they will soon have to teach newly acquired material to someone else, suggests new research from Washington University in St. Louis.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Czcibor
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 26, 2013
both whites and minorities who feel racially discriminated against experience worsened mental and even physical health


When such data are measured among non-whites it is a sign of damage caused by discrimination, while when it's measured among whites it is a sign that they were already insane at start ;)

(you know, it's a correlation in can be interpreted in different ways, pending on need)

Personally, that's the reason why I'm somewhat careful about pools where I'm not sure whether people are asked about fact from their life and more about their subjective perception.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (3) Jan 26, 2013
One of the most famous is Michael Weiner, aka Michael Savage who is a Jew from Brooklyn.
Had there been no affirmative action, he would likely be a professor at Berkley.
Thanks to the 'liberals', he has a successful anti-socialism radio show and has authored several bestselling books.
VendicarE
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 26, 2013
Didn't the U.K. prevent Weiner from entering the country based on the fact that he was a piece of human filth, and a hate monger?

"Thanks to the 'liberals', he has a successful anti-socialism radio show and has authored several bestselling books." - RyggTard

"You know, when I see a woman walking around with a burqa, I see a Nazi." - Michael Savage

youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2ZDo4xbS0r4#!

With such racism, sexism, homophobia, and hate, from Weiner. No wonder Randites and other anti-social parasites like RyggTard love him.