USPTO to stage two forums for software community

Jan 07, 2013 by Nancy Owano weblog

(Phys.org)—Let the conversations begin. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) intends to stage two roundtable discussions with developers on the East and West coasts next month to talk about software patents. The notice appearing in the Federal Register, titled "Request for Comments and Notice of Roundtable Events for Partnership for Enhancement of Quality of Software-Related Patents," invites software developers to express their opinions. The patent office meetings will take place in California and New York. The West Coast roundtable will be held at Stanford University on February 12 and the East Coast event will be held at New York University in New York City on February 27.

According to the notice, "While public attendees will have the opportunity to provide their individual input, group consensus advice will not be sought...." As The Verge interprets this, "This is about examining and potentially tweaking the process, not changing the laws."

Nonetheless, the engaging with the industry on patent issues may prove to be quite beneficial. The conversation may produce concerns by about unjustifiable protections and the need to clarify the vague and broad terms at times evidenced in the filing language used. According to the Register notice, "The USPTO seeks comments on how to more effectively ensure that the boundaries of a claim are clear so that the public can understand what subject matter is protected by the patent claim and the patent examiner can identify and apply the most pertinent prior art."

Software community members who want to attend the meetings need to register by February 4 via e-mail to SoftwareRoundtable2013@uspto.gov but entry will be on a first-come first serve basis. Those applying will need to specify which of the two events they plan to attend. They need to provide their names, titles, and if applicable company organizations, along with their addresses, phone numbers and e-mail addresses. The organizers are also asking those who seek to register to state if they want to make an oral presentation, its topic, and the presentation's desired length.

Both roundtables are to be webcast. Written comments are invited; the deadline for written comments is March 15, after the events have taken place.

Already, web site postings of the USPTO's intentions to invite dialogue through the two events have produced hundreds of comments from software developers. The reactions indicate how heated the topic of software patents has been and will be in the realm of intellectual property. The comments mirror the opinions among those in the software business who have been saying for some time that patents for software are untenable; that they are innovation killers; and that they hurt small businesses that don't have the deep pockets of software magnates. On the other side, software patent defenders think that patents help, not hinder, innovators by protecting them.

The reactions can be summarized as pro, con, and middling. "As a full-time owner of a small software business... the best way to fix them is to ban them," said one typical anti-patent response. "They are so counter-productive I wouldn't know where to start." Another recent respondent said he is sticking to his corporate job rather than doing a startup for fear that somebody is going to try to shake him down for copying what he did not copy.

There does appear to be a middle ground between heatedly pro and heatedly con software players.

"Nuking software patents is too broad a solution," wrote one of the recent respondents to news of the forums, recommending instead that efforts to improve software patents be made by involving software engineers as patent examiners.

Explore further: Sony faces 4th ex-employee lawsuit over hack

More information: www.federalregister.gov/articl… nt-of-quality-of#h-4

Related Stories

Microsoft's Patent Threats Evoke Retorts

May 18, 2007

Partly in response to Microsoft's recent patent threats to Linux and other open-source software, the FSF (Free Software Foundation) announced on May 16 the creation of a new activist campaigns team to organize public support ...

America Invents Act is a game changer

Jul 23, 2012

In an article published in the current issue of Technology and Innovation- Proceedings of the National Academy of Inventors, Janet Gongola, Patent Reform Coordinator for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), descri ...

Google buys IBM patents to beef up portfolio

Jul 30, 2011

Google has bought more than 1,000 technology patents from IBM as the Internet giant seeks to build up its portfolio and head off potential intellectual property suits.

Recommended for you

Sony faces 4th ex-employee lawsuit over hack

1 hour ago

A former director of technology for Sony Pictures Entertainment has sued the company over the data breach that resulted in the online posting of his private financial and personal information.

Sony tells AFP it still plans movie release

3 hours ago

Sony Pictures boss Michael Lynton denied Friday the Hollywood studio has "caved" by canceling the release of "The Interview," and said it still hoped to release the controversial film.

2012 movie massacre hung over 'Interview' decision

16 hours ago

When a group claiming credit for the hacking of Sony Pictures Entertainment threated violence against theaters showing "The Interview" earlier this week, the fate of the movie's big-screen life was all but ...

Clooney slams skittish Hollywood after Sony hack

23 hours ago

Film star George Clooney slammed the Hollywood movie industry for failing to stand up against the cyber threats that prompted Sony Pictures to cancel release of the movie "The Interview."

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Jan 07, 2013
Sort of funny that they want to have a roundtable for software developers at two PHYSICALLY distinct locations. I'm sure that developers are fairly at home with teleconferencing.
Meyer
not rated yet Jan 07, 2013
I am not completely opposed to software patents, but the protection should be on the order of 2 years (a typical product release cycle), not 20. There is no need for more incentive than that, so there should be no more protection than that.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.