Smart organizations should also be stupid, according to new theory

Jan 28, 2013

Critical reflection and shrewdness can help companies to avoid crises, but sometimes good old-fashioned stupidity can serve an important function in raising the efficiency of an organization, claims Mats Alvesson, Professor of Organisation Studies at the School of Economics and Management, Lund University, Sweden, in a new theory of 'functional stupidity' that has been published in the Journal of Management Studies.

"We see functional stupidity as the absence of critical reflection. It is a state of unity and consensus that makes employees in an organisation avoid questioning decisions, structures and visions", says Mats Alvesson. "Paradoxically, this sometimes helps to raise productivity in an organisation."

Together with colleague André Spicer, Mats Alvesson has written an article entitled 'A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organisations', which was recently published in the renowned and has been featured in the . In the article, he expounds the logic behind 'functional stupidity'.

"It is a double-edged sword. It is functional because it has some advantages and makes people concentrate enthusiastically on the task in hand. It is stupid because risks and problems may arise when people do not pose critical questions about what they and the organisation are doing."

The state is partly a consequence of a kind of 'stupidity ', which suppresses and marginalises doubt and blocks within the organisation. The parallels with some companies' sudden financial crashes in recent years are clear.

"Short-term use of intellectual resources, consensus and an absence of disquieting questions about decisions and structures may oil the organisational machinery and contribute to harmony and increased productivity in a company. However, it may also be its downfall."

According to the researchers, some industries are more stupid than others. Organisations that make a virtue of their staff's wisdom and sell intangible services or branded products, such as parts of the mass media, the fashion industry and consultancy firms, are highlighted as being particularly disposed to develop functional stupidity.

"Functional stupidity is prominent in economies that are dominated by persuasion using images and symbolic manipulation. It is preferable that people have an enthusiastic belief in an activity which may not necessarily fulfil a need. New management may be required to manage the fine balance and possible pitfalls of functional stupidity", says Mats Alvesson.

Explore further: Economist probes the high cost of health care

More information: Link to article: 'A Stupidity-Based Theory of Organisations', published in the Journal of Management Studies: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10… 012.01072.x/abstract

Link to Andrew Hill's column 'The Quest for the Right Kind of Stupidity' in the Financial Times: www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2cefbab2-5b… a.html#axzz2Ib7RPT95

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

No patch for human stupidity: hackers

Aug 08, 2011

Hackers at DefCon have long understood that there is no patch for human stupidity. Last week, security researchers uncovered yet another strain of malicious software aimed at smartphones that run Google's ...

Risk management critical to corporate strategy

Jan 07, 2009

With the consequences of the current financial crisis spreading to the real economy, lawmakers are exploring new regulations to govern the financial markets. The concern among market participants is that policy-makers do ...

Guilt fuels commitment to the job: expert

Jul 27, 2010

Feeling a sense of guilt or obligation towards an employer can increase an employee's commitment to an organisation, a University of Queensland Business School researcher has found in a study of Chinese workers.

IT-enabled change must involve the entire organization

Mar 29, 2010

The secret to successful IT-enabled change is the right balance between "hard" factors like planning, goals, structure and system architecture and "soft" factors like mindset, culture and organisation. This is one conclusion ...

Recommended for you

Economist probes the high cost of health care

22 hours ago

When Zack Cooper arrived at Yale as assistant professor of public health and economics, he gained access to a first-of-its-kind dataset. Working with the non-profit Health Care Cost Institute, Cooper and ...

Cash remains king in Chile but its days could be numbered

Mar 26, 2015

For more than a year now, Chileans have endured a crisis of cash access. Despite global moves toward new forms of payment such as contactless and mobile transfers, the crisis in Chile highlights the continuing ...

Will you ever pay off your student loan?

Mar 25, 2015

Would-be participants of higher education must be given full and transparent advice before they accumulate debts as students that follow them into the workplace, according to a report published in the International Journal of ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Whydening Gyre
1 / 5 (4) Jan 28, 2013
4 parts smart, 1 part not so smart is the most efficient way to run a company for the long run.
VendicarE
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2013
So there is a function for Conservatives after all.

And here I thought that their only true value was as a source of high protein, high fat, cattle feed.
omatwankr
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2013
cattle feed
omatwankr
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 28, 2013
cattle feed 8{0

Ever herd of BSE
Blustering Sociopathic Encephalopatheticicity

Those poor cows

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.