Shell's foundering ship has some questioning wisdom of Arctic drilling

Jan 04, 2013 by Sean Cockerham

Critics want a halt to offshore Arctic drilling in the wake of Shell's latest mishap in the waters off Alaska, but there's no sign the Obama administration and key members of Congress are backing off their support for drilling in the sensitive region.

Interior Secretary let Shell begin preparatory drilling in Alaska's this summer, the first time in two decades. Environmental groups on Thursday called for the administration to immediately put a stop to all permitting for Arctic offshore oil exploration as a result of Monday's grounding of Shell's drilling rig in Alaska. But Salazar isn't willing to put the permits on hold.

"The administration understands that the presents unique challenges, and that's why the secretary has repeatedly made clear that any approved drilling activities will be held to the highest safety and environmental standards," Salazar spokesman Blake Androff said Thursday. "The department will continue to carefully review permits for any activity, and all proposals must meet our rigorous standards."

Salazar has not given Shell permission to drill deep enough to actually hit oil. The company hopes to get that approval this summer.

The chairman of the House Resources Committee, Washington state Republican Doc Hastings, is a drilling supporter, and that hasn't changed.

"Rather than jumping to conclusions, he believes the focus right now needs to be on safely resolving the situation," said Hastings' spokeswoman, Jill Strait.

Shell is taking some heat. A group of 46 released a statement Thursday saying they want answers from the Coast Guard and the Interior Department about the rig incident. "This is the latest in a series of alarming blunders ...," said the House Sustainable Energy and Environmental Coalition Caucus.

But the group represents a small minority of the 435-member House of Representatives, which is controlled by Republicans.

Shell's drilling rig Kulluk broke free from its towline Monday after running into a winter storm in the Gulf of Alaska. The rig grounded off Sitkalidak Island, just south of Kodiak Island, and an attempt to try a salvage operation is being planned. There are worries about a potential spill of the estimated 155,000 gallons of diesel fuel and other petroleum products on board the vessel.

The vessel that was towing the rig is owned and run by the politically connected Louisiana company Edison Chouest Offshore. The company was the top campaign contributor in the most recent election cycle for Hastings, as well as Alaska Republicans Rep. Don Young and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, according to the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington. Edison Chouest also is among the top donors to Alaska Democratic Sen. Mark Begich, who, like the rest of Alaska's delegation, is an ardent supporter of the .

The grounding follows a September incident in which the spill containment dome on Shell's response barge, the Arctic Challenger, was, according to an internal email by a federal regulator, "crushed like a beer can" during testing in Washington state's Puget Sound.

And a different Shell , the Noble Discoverer, dragged anchor in Alaska's Dutch Harbor in July, had a small fire in its smokestack and was cited for safety and pollution issues.

Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat who is the incoming chairman of the Senate Energy and Commerce Committee, isn't ready to put the hammer on Shell.

"The Coast Guard and will be investigating the causes of this incident, so it's too soon to draw any firm conclusions," Wyden said in a prepared statement. "But as I've said before, I plan to look at drilling safety rules this year to see if regulators are doing enough to make sure offshore drilling operations aren't putting lives or the environment at risk."

Murkowski is the top Republican on the Senate energy committee and has shown signs of working closely with Wyden.

"The extreme winter weather and high seas in the Gulf of Alaska would have been a challenge for any vessel," said Murkowski spokesman Robert Dillon. "This is a maritime transportation incident, not a accident. There are certainly lessons to be learned from this event, but it's irresponsible to use any pretext to try to stop the development of the energy our nation runs on."

Explore further: New water balance calculation for the Dead Sea

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Shell Alaska scales back Arctic drilling until next year

Sep 18, 2012

Shell Alaska has abandoned efforts to drill into hydrocarbon deposits in the offshore Arctic after the latest glitch on its troubled oil containment barge damaged the high-tech dome designed to contain any underwater oil ...

US not ready for Arctic oil drilling, say officials

Feb 07, 2011

The United States is ill-equipped to deal with a major oil catastrophe in Alaska, the Coast Guard admiral who led the US response to the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill and others have warned.

US opens ways for Shell Arctic Ocean drilling

Aug 05, 2011

US officials have granted oil giant Shell conditional approval to begin drilling exploration wells in the Arctic Ocean from next year, a move swiftly slammed by conservationists as "inexcusable".

Recommended for you

EU sets new energy savings target at 30%

35 minutes ago

After months of tough negotiations, the European Commission recommended Wednesday a new energy savings target of 30 percent so as to combat climate change and ensure self-sufficiency.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Howhot
1 / 5 (1) Jan 05, 2013
Do I hear a Duuhhh out there in cyberspace? Every engineer in world could have told these guys that they the platform wasn't good enough for the Arctic. It's even worst that just not being prepared. It's Gulf-of-Mexico quality negligence. I really honestly think these guys should be banned from all deep water drilling period!

Write your congress critters on that one, unless you want a Gulf scale spill in the wilderness of Alaska and the Arctic Ocean Ice.
dan42day
1 / 5 (1) Jan 06, 2013
Write your congress critters on that one, unless you want a Gulf scale spill in the wilderness of Alaska and the Arctic Ocean Ice.


Yes by all means get the western oil corporations out of arctic oil exploration. That way the russians can move in and produce the vast reserves of oil in that area. After all, they are much more sensitive to their citizen's environmental concerns and would make less of a mess than Western companies.

The fact is, the economy that feeds a large percentage of the 7 billion people on this planet depends on oil. If we have not found a suitable replacement by the time oil becomes scarce, those economies will begin to fail, and millions will be faced with starvation. Then nobody is going to care about the arctic wilderness.

We need to pressure the companies that produce it to do so as responsibly as is economically possible, but banning the companies we have the most infuence over would be a self-defeating exercise in futility.