Rethinking permitting: Regulatory reform needed in the quest for renewable energy alternatives, expert says

Jan 15, 2013
Rethinking permitting: Regulatory reform needed in the quest for renewable energy alternatives, expert says

(Phys.org)—Amid the economic and environmental realities of fossil fuel dependence in the United States, regulatory processes need immediate reform to allow renewable energy initiatives such as offshore wind to provide alternatives, according to the University of Maine's first School of Economics Visiting Professor of Energy Law and Policy.

Indeed, argues Jeffrey Thaler, a nationally known environmental attorney, writing in the current edition of the journal Environmental Law, existing environmental laws and regulations actually tend to support increasing .

"We have little time left to create a practical path to achieving an 80 percent reduction in by 2050" (the deadline set by the National Research Council and other agencies to begin to stabilize concentrations), Thaler writes.

Failing to reduce fossil fuel reliance, he says, will result in average rising more than the internationally agreed targeted ceiling of 2 degrees C.

In his article, "Fiddling as the World Floods and Burns: How Climate Change Urgently Requires a Paradigm Shift in the Permitting of Renewable Energy Projects," Thaler for the first time integrates the ongoing and predicted —increased , glacial melting, and —with a "detailed roadmap" for reforming environmental processes used in reviewing proposed renewable energy projects.

Using offshore wind power as a case study, Thaler examines the obstacles confronting a potential developer and showed that in an increasingly carbon-constrained world, existing environmental laws and regulatory processes no longer achieve the long-term goal of ecosystem conservation.

"The existing regulatory process should be quickly reformed so that offshore wind and other clean, renewable energy sources can help us escape the escalating consequences of our carbon-intensive economic system," writes Thaler.

Thaler traces the "byzantine labyrinth of laws and regulations" to the 1970s when "some of the nation's fundamental environmental laws were enacted—before we were aware of climate change threats—so as to slow down the review of proposed projects by requiring more studies of potential project impacts before approval."

Today, the outdated and often "self-defeating maze" of regulatory requirements poses significant barriers to domestic and international interest of increasing viable carbon emission-free renewable energy sources to decrease use of fossil fuel energy, Thaler says.

Regulation of renewable energy initiatives remains "unduly burdensome, slow and expensive," and results in a chilling effect on investment and substantial growth in renewable energy initiatives.

That's particularly unfortunate for a renewable energy initiative such as offshore wind projects, Thaler says, which "have the potential to generate large quantities of pollutant-free electricity near many of the world's major population centers, and thus to help reduce the ongoing and projected economic, health, and environmental damages from climate change."

Thaler's article provides perspective on the primary federal permitting and licensing that typically affects offshore wind development: the Energy Policy Act; regulations of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement; the National Environmental Policy Act; Endangered Species Act; Marine Mammal Protection Act; and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.

For offshore wind developers, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is "the most onerous statute," Thaler says, because its broad scope has the potential to spark litigation. The lengthy NEPA process requires those not exempted to conduct an environmental assessment, which usually requires a year or more to complete.

Thaler calls for a in order to create new, targeted policy efforts to accelerate the implementation of clean, . Such reform in licensing and permitting would make it possible for the U.S. to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 80 percent in 2050 by increasing electricity production from renewable sources from the current 13 percent to 80 percent, he says.

According to Thaler, who has been involved in energy and environmental policy, law and ethics for almost 30 years, concrete steps to streamline regulatory and permitting processes and requirements to benefit renewable energy project would include prioritizing the regulatory review of renewable energy projects in new and existing laws; establishing expedited timelines for agency reviews and decisions; and amending the National Environmental Policy Act to expand the types of projects excluded—especially small-scale pilots—and to require that the "hidden" costs of energy from fossil fuel be taken into account.

"We must first understand where our carbon-driven energy and electricity technologies are taking us, and learn from the experiences and lessons climate change scientists are trying to teach us, because we are on the verge of losing—for the next thousand or more years—the environmental and economic quality of life that we inherited," Thaler concludes.

"Second, we must understand, in an increasingly carbon-constrained world, how our existing environmental laws and regulatory processes no longer achieve their underlying goals of long-term ecosystem conservation," he says. Third, we must "significantly revamp the legal process in order to greatly accelerate the development of projects like offshore wind power."

Explore further: Artificial 'beaks' that collect water from fog: A drought solution?

More information: Paper: law.lclark.edu/live/files/1315… ready-for-websitepdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Climate change panel: renewable energy to be key

May 05, 2011

(AP) -- The world's top scientific body concluded that renewable energy in the coming decades will be widespread and could one day represent the dominant source for powering factories and lighting homes, ...

Do the benefits of renewable energy sources stack up?

Aug 13, 2007

Do the overall efficiencies of renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, and geothermal add up in terms of their complete life cycle from materials sourcing, manufacture, running, and decommissioning? Researchers in ...

IEA backs renewable energy

Nov 23, 2011

Renewable energy resources are growing very fast but countries still must be vigilant to ensure that they continue to expand, the International Energy Agency said Wednesday.

Recommended for you

Congress: Safety agency mishandled GM recall

22 hours ago

Both houses of Congress scolded the U.S. highway safety agency Tuesday over its tardy handling of a deadly problem with General Motors cars, questioning whether it is competent to guarantee the safety of ...

Jindal: Obama hasn't done enough to harness energy

Sep 16, 2014

The governor of the state of Louisiana, a possible Republican presidential candidate, said Tuesday that President Barack Obama's administration has become "science deniers," failing to do enough to harness the nation's energy ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

moebiex
not rated yet Jan 15, 2013
It strikes me that we have multiple levels to consider on this, not just increasing the ROE for big firms competing with conventional energy for capital. It seems to me if more (smaller scale) installations are somehow given some advantage we have more potential to get a lot more jobs out of it, smaller negative environmental footprints/impacts and more positive impacts than if we just go with the standard multi-billion $$ monsters. That will require a re-write of economic incentives including some legal protections large companies have supported to protect their investments including legislated oligopolies and artificial subsidies as further support to pursue economies of scale- but hey- economics is a human invention not natural law. That will of course require the backing of the 1% at least some of whome are likely to see that as a kind of threat better stillborn than supported. Still- if our climate goes completely sideways so will our civilization and all the benefits it provides.