Prosecutors take issue with Brazil's new forestry code

Jan 22, 2013
A burnt tree lies down on a road along the Amazon rainforest, 270 kms from Tailandia, in Para, northen Brazil, on February 26, 2008. Brazil's new forestry code—approved last year at the urging of the powerful agrobusiness sector—faced a constitutional challenge Tuesday from federal prosecutors afraid it threatens the Amazon rainforest.

Brazil's new forestry code—approved last year at the urging of the powerful agrobusiness sector—faced a constitutional challenge Tuesday from federal prosecutors afraid it threatens the Amazon rainforest.

The prosecutors filed three actions against the legislation before the Supreme Court, demanding it be partially suspended on grounds it "reduces and abolishes areas previously viewed as protected," a statement from their office said.

They also challenged the amnesty granted to those who illegally cleared forest land prior to 2008, one of the most contentious points of the new code.

Designating land as protected aims to "preserve and restore essential ," said acting Sandra Cureau in her filing.

Last October, the final text of the new code came into force after President Dilma Rousseff vetoed the most radical aspects of the measure.

Rousseff's vetoes capped years of congressional wrangling over the disputed reform between the pro-farm lobby and who fear the new code will lead to further deforestation in the Amazon.

More than 60 percent of Brazil's 8.5 million square kilometers (3.3 million square miles) are jungles and forests, but two-thirds of it is either privately owned or its ownership is undefined.

The previous code, which dated back to 1965 and which farmers said was not being respected, limited the use of land for farming and mandated that up to 80 percent of privately-owned land in the Amazon rainforest remain intact.

After Rousseff's vetoes, the new text maintains that obligation, but allows landowners to cultivate riverbanks and hillsides that were previously exempt, and eases restrictions for small who face difficulties in recovering illegally cleared land.

It also provides an amnesty from fines for anyone who illegally cleared trees before July 2008.

Key reasons for the destruction of the world's largest rainforest are fires, the advance of agriculture and stockbreeding, and illegal trafficking in timber and minerals.

Deforestation has slowed since Brazil declared war on the practice in 2004 and vowed to cut it by 80 percent by 2020.

Officials said in November the Amazon lost 4,656 square kilometers (1,797 square miles) of rainforest between August 2011 to July 2012, 27 percent less than the previous year, and the lowest rate since Brazil began monitoring.

Explore further: A success in managed pressure drilling

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Brazil president makes final changes to forestry law

Oct 18, 2012

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has vetoed nine articles of a new forestry code approved by Congress that environmentalists said would lead to further deforestation in the Amazon rainforest.

Brazil says Amazon deforestation at record low

Nov 27, 2012

Deforestation of Brazil's Amazon has slowed for a fourth consecutive year to its lowest rate since authorities began monitoring the world's largest rainforest, officials said Tuesday.

Amazon deforestation increases six-fold

May 19, 2011

A sharp increase in forest destruction in March and April in the Amazon has led Brazil to announce the creation of an emergency task force to fight against deforestation.

Amazon deforestation on the rise again in Brazil

Aug 03, 2011

Deforestation in Brazil's Amazon accelerated in June, with more than 300 square kilometers destroyed, a 17 percent increase over the previous month, government researchers said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

A success in managed pressure drilling

7 minutes ago

As one of BP's top 40 wells globally (and the only UK well qualifying for that category in 2012), the successful delivery of the Harding field's 'Producer North East 2a' well (referred to as PNE2a) was crucial to the business. ...

Passion for the natural world clears the waters

15 minutes ago

A toxic legacy has hung over the picturesque northern NSW coastal hamlet of Urunga for almost 40 years. Although now obscured by dense vegetation, the forest of dead melaleuca trees at the edge of a wetland ...

Indonesia to ratify ASEAN haze agreement

4 hours ago

Indonesia's parliament on Tuesday voted to ratify a regional agreement on cross-border haze as fires ripped through forests in the west of the country, choking neighbouring Singapore with hazardous smog.

Study urges 15-year plan for low-carbon growth

6 hours ago

The world can save both financial and environmental costs by shifting toward a low-carbon economy over the next 15 years, a high-level panel said Tuesday ahead of a UN summit.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Jan 22, 2013
Is this correct? The bureaucracy is suing the legislature?

Isn't a bureaucracy suppose to do what it is told (by law)?