Prosecutor defends handling on Internet activist case

Jan 17, 2013
A US prosecutor at the center of a controversy over the handling of a case involving an Internet activist who committed suicide has defended the government's actions as "appropriate."

A US prosecutor at the center of a controversy over the handling of a case involving an Internet activist who committed suicide has defended the government's actions as "appropriate."

Assistant US Attorney Carmen Ortiz expressed regret over the death of Aaron Swartz, who was accused of illegally copying and distributing millions of academic articles from a database but said prosecutors were merely doing their job.

"I know there is little I can say to abate the anger felt by those who believe that this office's prosecution of Mr. Swartz was unwarranted and somehow led to the tragic result of him taking his own life," she said in a statement Wednesday.

She added that "the career prosecutors handling this matter took on the difficult task of enforcing a law they had taken an oath to uphold, and did so reasonably."

Ortiz said that contrary to media reports, prosecutors had no intention of seeking the maximum 35 years imprisonment for Swartz and that in plea negotiations offered to recommend six months in "a low-security setting."

She said any sentencing would have been decided by a judge and that defense lawyers could have argued for probation if Swartz agreed to plead guilty.

The case has ignited a flurry of comments over what some called a "draconian" US computer crime law used by allegedly overzealous .

Swartz, who was just 14 when he co-developed the RSS feeds that are now the norm for publishing frequent updates online and went on to help launch website Reddit, hanged himself in his New York apartment on Friday.

He was 26 and reported to have been battling depression.

He had been due to stand trial in April for allegedly breaking into a closet at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to plug into the and download millions of academic journal articles from the subscription-only JSTOR service.

US Representative Zoe Lofgren this week proposed a reform of the statute used by the prosecution in a proposal she dubbed "Aaron's Law."

"There's no way to reverse the tragedy of Aaron's death, but we can work to prevent a repeat of the abuses of power he experienced," the lawmaker wrote on Reddit.

"The government was able to bring such disproportionate charges against Aaron because of the broad scope of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) and the wire fraud statute. It looks like the government used the vague wording of those laws to claim that violating an online service's user agreement or terms of service is a violation of the CFAA and the wire fraud statute."

Explore further: Researchers create global road maps showing potential economic and ecological consequences of new roads

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Online buzz grows over US Internet activist suicide

Jan 16, 2013

As funeral services were held for Internet activist Aaron Swartz, the debate intensified over what some called a "draconian" US computer crime law used by allegedly overzealous prosecutors.

Recommended for you

China's Alibaba plans IPO for week of September 8

16 hours ago

Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba plans to hold its initial public offering on the US stock market the week of September 8, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Tablet sales slow as PCs find footing

17 hours ago

Tablets won't eclipse personal computers as fast as once thought, according to studies by market tracker International Data Corporation (IDC).

Startups offer banking for smartphone users

17 hours ago

The latest banks are small enough to fit in the palm of your hand. Startups, such as Moven and Simple, offer banking that's designed specifically for smartphones, enabling users to track their spending on the go. Some things ...

FIXD tells car drivers via smartphone what is wrong

Aug 29, 2014

A key source of anxiety while driving solo, when even a bothersome back-seat driver's comments would have made you listen: the "check engine" light is on but you do not feel, smell or see anything wrong. ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

penguinator
not rated yet Jan 17, 2013
The article is quite complete and balanced. Only lacking in one thing, and that is a link to the White House petition, as follows:
(The URL that _should have_ appeared here is being blocked by this site's BBS software. Follow the directions at the end of the post, and your search engine will show you a page from Amazon, with the link you should have seen here, right at the top.)

Obama may very well pay no attention to it, but it will 'send a message' when the number of signatures is publicized -- as well as providing legislators attempting to remedy this, with a measure of the public's support.

There is a White House petition under way, for those who believe the prosecutor's explanation of reasons for the Swartz suicide to be inadequate. The more signatures, the better, to possibly 'send a message'.

Here are appropriate search terms you may use:

petition whitehouse "remove-united-states-district-attorney-carmen-ortiz-office-overreach-case-aaron-swart
deatopmg
3 / 5 (2) Jan 17, 2013
This is a classic case of bullying by DOJs definition.