NASA testing vintage engine from Apollo 11 rocket

Jan 24, 2013 by Jay Reeves

Young NASA engineers are testing a vintage rocket engine that was meant to blast the first U.S. lunar mission into Earth's orbit more than 40 years ago.

The agency conducted the last of 11 test firings Thursday on the heart of the engine, which was once part of the Apollo program's massive Saturn V (five) rocket.

The device shot out a huge plume of orange flame at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville. The thundering roar could be heard for miles.

Officials hope to use technology from the for the next generation of U.S. missions into space by the 2020s.

NASA engineer Nick Case is 27 years old, and he's impressed with the work done by engineers using slide rules and pencils in the 1960s.

Explore further: NASA's MMS observatories stacked for testing

4.8 /5 (10 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

NASA to begin developing Ares rockets

Dec 17, 2007

The U.S. space agency said it will begin testing core rocket engine components from the Apollo era this month to help build the Ares rocket.

Image: The shake, rattle and roar of the J-2X engine

May 17, 2012

(Phys.org) -- The shake, rattle and roar lasted just seven seconds, but the short J-2X test conducted May 16 at NASA's John C. Stennis Space Center in south Mississippi moved the space agency ever closer to ...

J-2X nozzle extension goes the distance

Jul 16, 2012

(Phys.org) -- NASA engineers conducted a 550-second test of the new J-2X rocket engine at Stennis Space Center in Mississippi on July 13. The J-2X engine will power the upper-stage of a planned two-stage Space ...

NASA performs first J-2X powerpack test of the year

Feb 16, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Engineers at NASA's Stennis Space Center conducted an initial test of the J-2X engine powerpack Feb. 15, kicking off a series of key tests in development of the rocket engine that will carry ...

NASA tests deep space J-2X rocket engine

Sep 29, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA conducted a 40-second test of the J-2X rocket engine Sept. 28, the most recent in a series of tests of the next-generation engine selected as part of the Space Launch System architecture ...

Recommended for you

NASA's MMS observatories stacked for testing

15 minutes ago

(Phys.org) —Engineers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., accomplished another first. Using a large overhead crane, they mated two Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, observatories – ...

ISEE-3 comes to visit Earth

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —It launched in 1978. It was the first satellite to study the constant flow of solar wind streaming toward Earth from a stable orbit point between our planet and the sun known as the Lagrangian ...

Testing immune cells on the International Space Station

15 hours ago

The human body is fine-tuned to Earth's gravity. A team headed by Professor Oliver Ullrich from the University of Zurich's Institute of Anatomy is now conducting an experiment on the International Space Station ...

Easter morning delivery for space station

21 hours ago

Space station astronauts got a special Easter treat: a cargo ship full of supplies. The shipment arrived Sunday morning via the SpaceX company's Dragon cargo capsule.

NASA's space station Robonaut finally getting legs

Apr 19, 2014

Robonaut, the first out-of-this-world humanoid, is finally getting its space legs. For three years, Robonaut has had to manage from the waist up. This new pair of legs means the experimental robot—now stuck ...

User comments : 7

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JustChris
not rated yet Jan 25, 2013
Brevity is the soul of wit: this article is definitely an example.
VendicarD
5 / 5 (2) Jan 25, 2013
It is funny that current NASA engineers really don't know how the Saturn 5's engines work, so they have to experiment on them to see how they were actually engineered.

This is what happens when you allow a technical program to go dead for a while. You lose the lineage of engineers who can tell the younger ones how things were done.
Eikka
5 / 5 (2) Jan 25, 2013
You lose the lineage of engineers who can tell the younger ones how things were done.


The main problem is that NASA did not develop the Saturn V engines. Rocketdyne did.

NASA is a rubber stamp organization. They do not develop technology, they pay someone else to do it for them, and then adopt and adapt it.
Eikka
5 / 5 (2) Jan 25, 2013
NASA engineer Nick Case is 27 years old, and he's impressed with the work done by engineers using slide rules and pencils in the 1960s.


What really happened:

For seven years of development F-1 tests revealed serious combustion instability problems which would sometimes cause catastrophic failure.[3] Progress on this problem was initially slow, as the problem onset was intermittent and unpredictable.

Eventually engineers developed a technique of detonating small explosive charges (which they called "bombs") outside the combustion chamber through a tangential tube (RDX, C4 or black powder were used) while the engine was firing, which allowed them to determine exactly how the running chamber responded to variations in pressure and to determine how to nullify these oscillations.

The designers could then quickly experiment with different co-axial fuel-injector designs to obtain the one most resistant to instability.


In other words: a lot of trial and error.
Eikka
5 / 5 (1) Jan 25, 2013
Although in the case of the Saturn V's F-1 engines, it wasn't NASA who commisioned the engine. It was the US Air Force who put up a wanted add for a really big engine, and Rocketdyne went on to develop one to sell it to the USAF, but then the Air Force decided they don't need one after all and the project was almost scrapped.

That's where NASA came in, saw that they already had a very large engine and said "I'd like 50 of those".
wiyosaya
not rated yet Jan 25, 2013
In other words: a lot of trial and error.

There is a great series on the Apollo program. In the series, it details this "main" problem with the F1 engine, which was an oscillation that caused them to explode. The series is called "Moon Machines" www.imdb.com/title/tt1203167
Shootist
1 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2013
Although in the case of the Saturn V's F-1 engines, it wasn't NASA who commisioned the engine. It was the US Air Force who put up a wanted add for a really big engine, and Rocketdyne went on to develop one to sell it to the USAF, but then the Air Force decided they don't need one after all and the project was almost scrapped.

That's where NASA came in, saw that they already had a very large engine and said "I'd like 50 of those".


In every instance above replace NASA with Von Braun and you will be closer to the truth.

More news stories

NASA's MMS observatories stacked for testing

(Phys.org) —Engineers at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., accomplished another first. Using a large overhead crane, they mated two Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, observatories – ...

ISEE-3 comes to visit Earth

(Phys.org) —It launched in 1978. It was the first satellite to study the constant flow of solar wind streaming toward Earth from a stable orbit point between our planet and the sun known as the Lagrangian ...

Easter morning delivery for space station

Space station astronauts got a special Easter treat: a cargo ship full of supplies. The shipment arrived Sunday morning via the SpaceX company's Dragon cargo capsule.

Atom probe assisted dating of oldest piece of earth

(Phys.org) —It's a scientific axiom: big claims require extra-solid evidence. So there were skeptics in 2001 when University of Wisconsin-Madison geoscience professor John Valley dated an ancient crystal ...