Researchers confirm intrinsic superconductor behavior revealed

Jan 16, 2013 by Anne Ju
A rendering of the infinite layer cuprate superconductor structure. White is oxygen, red is copper and blue is strontium or lanthanum. Credit: Brian Lee

(Phys.org)—When it comes to high-temperature superconductors, a class of materials called cuprates is king, and it is science's ongoing quest to determine their exact physical subtleties. Cornell physicists and materials scientists have now verified that cuprates respond differently when adding electrons versus removing them, resolving a central issue about the compounds' most fundamental properties.

The multidisciplinary study was a collaboration led by graduate student John Harter; visiting professor Luigi Maritato of the University of Salerno, Italy; and senior authors Darrell Schlom, the Herbert Fisk Johnson Professor of Industrial Chemistry, and Kyle Shen, assistant professor of physics, both members of the Kavli Institute at Cornell for Nanoscale Science, and published Dec. 27 in .

The study describes the behavior of a strontium-lanthanum cuprate superconductor when chemically "doped" with , meaning more electrons are introduced into their two-dimensional copper-oxygen sheets, where superconductivity is known to reside.

When cooled to about 100 Kelvin (-280 Fahrenheit), the electrons in these sheets undergo a phase transition and become superconducting, which means electrons can flow freely through them without resistance. The cuprates are the highest-temperature class of known—"high temperature" by physicists' standards, anyway.

Shen and colleagues chose to explore the strontium- cuprates, which physicists nickname the "infinite layer" compound, to observe their transition into and out of a magnetic state called antiferromagnetism by doping electrons into the system.

They confirmed, using photoelectron spectroscopy to map the motion of electrons, that the shift from antiferromagnetism was similar to the shift observed in the only other class of electron-doped cuprate superconductor, called RCCO—confirming for the first time that these behaviors are intrinsic to all electron-doped cuprates, but behave quite differently from their so-called hole-doped cousins.

It was an important discovery, Shen said, because the electron-doped cuprate superconductors are poorly understood compared with hole-doped cuprates: their behavior altered by the removal of electrons from the lattice. Many theories describing high-temperature superconductivity intrinsically assume that the cuprates should respond the same way when doping with electrons or holes—an assumption that now needs to be revisited, Shen said.

Schlom's thin films of the infinite layer cuprates allowed for this precise electron mapping. It had previously been nearly impossible to study this compound because it is usually found in a powdery form unsuitable for measurements.

A combined technique of molecular-beam epitaxy to make the films, and the films' immediate transfer to spectroscopic analysis, was made possible by an integrated molecular beam epitaxy system with an angle-resolved photoemission spectrometer. This technique could pave the way for making brand-new materials with superconducting properties, Shen said. The thin film fabrication and measurements were carried out by Harter and Maritato.

Explore further: Longer distance quantum teleportation achieved

Related Stories

Superconductivity: The puzzle is taking shape

Sep 13, 2011

By destabilizing superconductivity with a strong magnetic field, the electrons of a "high temperature" superconductor align into linear filaments. This phenomenon has been demonstrated by a team of researchers ...

Counting the 'Holes' in High-Temperature Superconductors

Mar 25, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- As part of the effort to better understand how superconductors transport electricity with zero resistance, a team of researchers has demonstrated a new way to count the number of a material's ...

Recommended for you

Uncovering the forbidden side of molecules

20 hours ago

Researchers at the University of Basel in Switzerland have succeeded in observing the "forbidden" infrared spectrum of a charged molecule for the first time. These extremely weak spectra offer perspectives ...

How Paramecium protozoa claw their way to the top

Sep 19, 2014

The ability to swim upwards – towards the sun and food supplies – is vital for many aquatic microorganisms. Exactly how they are able to differentiate between above and below in often murky waters is ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

johanfprins
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 17, 2013
Many theories describing high-temperature superconductivity intrinsically assume that the cuprates should respond the same way when doping with electrons or holes—an assumption that now needs to be revisited, Shen said.
This has all along been so obviously wrong that it is hilarious that the mainstream scientits on superconduction could even contemplate it.

I have a full model which clearly explains the roles of holes and electrons in the ceramics, and how this interaction causes the so called misnamed "pseudogap".

I could not get it published during the past 8 years simply because "pair-formation" does not play a role. But I suppose as long the legacies of incompetent physicists like Brian Pippard, Brian Josephson, Archie Campbell, David Cardwell, David Ginley, and the other nincompoops at Cambridge University prevail, we have no chance.

Unfortunately this lack of intelligence is not just found at Cambridge University. The west coast of the USA is even worse!

Minich
2.3 / 5 (3) Jan 18, 2013
Many theories describing high-temperature superconductivity intrinsically assume that the cuprates should respond the same way when doping with electrons or holes—an assumption that now needs to be revisited, Shen said.


It is obvious to be incorrect. The reason is the band theory, which is incorrect, when applyed to ANY superconductor.
Band theory is incorrect for so called "conventional" superconductors and band theory is incorrect for high temperature superconductors.

It is also incorrect in case of so called correlated electron systems (monstrous "boson" pairing systems).

Khehehe

To understand quantum mechanics is not to graduate from Urbana-Shampain University. Everybody is equal before Nature, be american or be russian, or be somebody other nation.