New research shows fishways have not helped fish

Jan 16, 2013
In spite of state-of-the-art fish passage facilities, actual numbers of fish passing through them at hydropower dams in the Northeast over several decades reached only a tiny fraction of targeted goals. Credit: UMass Amherst

Despite modern designs intended to allow migratory fish to pass, hydropower dams on major Northeast U.S. waterways, including the Merrimack and Connecticut rivers, have failed to let economically important species such as salmon, shad and river herring reach their spawning grounds, say a team of economists and fish ecologists including Adrian Jordaan of the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

This raises serious questions about the impact of new dams now being planned and constructed on major waterways worldwide, say the researchers in the current issue of Conservation Letters. The international team led by J. Jed Brown of the Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, , included investigators at , Syracuse; Virginia Tech, the University of Arizona, City University of New York and the University of Victoria, British Columbia as well as UMass Amherst.

They found that in spite of state-of-the-art passage facilities, actual numbers of fish passing through them over several decades reached only a tiny fraction of targeted goals. "It may be time to admit failure of fish passage and hatchery-based restoration programs and acknowledge that ecologically and economically significant diadromous species restoration is not possible without removals," say Jordaan, Brown and colleagues.

The three river systems studied, the Merrimack, Connecticut and Susquehanna, are historically important for fish populations that migrate from the sea to spawn in , known as diadromous species. They include sturgeon, salmon, shad, alewife, blueback herring and eel. Four of the nearly 20 dams studied are on the Susquehanna, with more than 10 on the Connecticut and five on the Merrimack. Jordaan points out that the Connecticut River watershed has more than 1,000 dams on tributaries, but those on the river's main stem have the most impact on all species.

Numbers of American shad, once one of America's premier food fish, that passed through these dams has hovered around 2 percent of the target in the Merrimack River and close to zero percent of target in the other two. "These dams are contributing to reduced resilience of not only shad, but all diadromous species," says UMass Amherst's Jordaan. "The result is that other factors including climate change will have a greater impact on these populations that are at fractions of their historical levels."

Restoration targets for river herring vary from several hundred thousand to millions of fish. However, in recent years, river herring returns on these rivers have averaged less than a thousand fish. Karin Limberg, a fisheries ecologist at SUNY Syracuse, says, "Once these rivers supported tens of millions of pounds of biomass of these species and provided valuable protein to a growing nation."

Using publically available data collected by various agencies since the 1960s, the research team shows that these state-of-the-art fish passage facilities have been unsuccessful. Some migratory species, such as sturgeons, do not pass through at all. But even the species that do make it through do so in numbers far less than stated targets.

System-wide passage efficiencies, defined as passage from the most downstream dam in a river up past the uppermost main stem dam with fish passage facilities, hover at less than 3 percent, the researchers report. Many of the species require habitat upstream of these dams, and without it diadromous are unlikely to recover, if past performance is an indication of future success.

The researchers note that at one fish passage facility with an educational center, no fish at all passed in a typical year. Strategies and techniques have not only failed to help fish cope with dams on these rivers, they add, but the losses of diadromous fish in the river systems has a major impact on food fisheries and biodiversity. Jordaan says they represent lost seafood production and greatly weakened marine food webs.

The authors support finding new approaches to the problem and call for ecologists and economists to propose alternatives to main stem dams. In Maine, they note, one creative solution developed by a broad coalition was to purchase two main stem dams on the state's largest river, the Penobscot. It offers an ideal situation because it splits into two rivers low in the watershed, allowing augmented hydropower capacity in one branch to compensate the electric utility with alternative power generation. But Jordaan says it remains to be seen whether the situation there can be improved for fish migrating upriver without more dam removals in the main stem and tributaries. And the challenge will be much greater in more typical rivers such as the Connecticut and other major east coast rivers that do not offer "two rivers in one."

He adds, "We feel these species represent a lost connection between marine and freshwater systems that is more important than the numbers." Their conclusions serve as a cautionary tale, he says, for planners in China, Laos and Cambodia, where engineers are on the verge of constructing hundreds of new main stem dams on major rivers such as the Mekong, the second most biodiverse freshwater system and host to the world's most productive inland fisheries in the world.

For the future, UMass Amherst's Jordaan recently received a grant from the Lenfest Ocean Program of Pew Charitable Trust to evaluate the historical role of forage fish in lost fisheries production and the implications for future sustainability.

Explore further: Climate change puts endangered Devils Hole pupfish at risk of extinction

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Small dams, big impact on Mekong River fish: study

Mar 05, 2012

Plans to build hydropower dams along small branches of southeast Asia's longest river could have a devastating impact on millions of people who rely on the world's largest inland fishery, scientists said Monday.

Something fishy about proposed dams

Aug 27, 2012

(Phys.org)—Millions of people are in danger of going hungry if the construction of dams on the lower Mekong River in South-East Asia goes ahead, according to research from The Australian National University.

New paper examines dams' effects on California salmon

Sep 24, 2007

Spring-run Chinook salmon and other fish in the rivers of California’s Central Valley could be harmed by more water-storage dams, according to researchers at Duke University and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Laos vows to address Mekong dam fears

Jul 06, 2012

Laos has pledged to stall construction of a controversial multi-billion dollar dam on the Mekong river until all its neighbours' environmental concerns have been answered, state media said Friday.

Transporting juvenile salmon hinders adult migration

Dec 05, 2008

Scientists have discovered that management efforts intended to assist migrations of salmon and steelhead trout can have unintended consequences for fish populations. Juveniles that are transported downstream on boats can ...

Researchers map fish species at risk from dams

May 10, 2012

Dams are believed to be one of the biggest threats to freshwater organisms worldwide: They disrupt normal patterns of water and sediment flow, impede migration, and alter the character of spawning and feeding grounds. A shortage ...

Recommended for you

Human traffic threatens urban forests

13 hours ago

A study investigating the affect of recreational trails in endangered urban forests has found that their expansiveness and unmethodical planning is increasing fragmentation and impacting biodiversity.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jrsm
not rated yet Jan 16, 2013
Are the dams blocking the passage of fish going up to spawn or the migration of fry to the oceans. On the west coast, the effect is on the latter.