Study shows federal housing program helps lowest income tenants

Jan 04, 2013 by Jennifer Reres

With 2.2 million units created, the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program is the largest federal program for the creation and renovation of affordable housing. But while public funding for private housing can serve a wider range of incomes than are usually served in traditional public housing, does this mean that those with the lowest incomes and the greatest need are being overlooked?

Evidently not, say researchers with NYU's Furman Center for Real Estate and and its Moelis Institute for Affordable Policy. According to a study they conducted, the LIHTC program does indeed serve many tenants with the greatest housing needs.

"While we found that the program does serve a wider range of low- households than other programs, we were surprised that more than 40 percent of LIHTC rental units are indeed for 'extremely low-income' tenants," says Katherine O'Regan, associate professor of public policy and director of the Public and Nonprofit Management program at the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, who co-authored the research paper on LIHTC tenant incomes. "This estimate is much more than many affordable housing experts anticipated."

The report titled "What Can We Learn About the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program by Looking at the Tenants?" also found that additional subsidies in the form of rental assistance are critical to serving the lowest income households in LIHTC properties. Seventy percent of lowest income households receive additional rental subsidies, without which these households could find themselves paying more than half their income toward rent.

In other words, without additional subsidies it is difficult for the LIHTC program to provide housing at rents affordable to those with the greatest need for affordable housing. need to consider this funding need when discussing how to provide housing to the lowest income households.

"This research sheds light for the first time on the incomes of households served by the country's largest affordable housing program," says Becky Koepnick, director of the Moelis Institute. "The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 required for the first time that states report tenant incomes and rents to the federal government. Not much was known about LIHTC tenants because little data has been collected in the past."

In the future, the Furman Center and its Moelis Institute hope to learn more about the LIHTC program and the tenants it serves, such as if families living in LIHTC properties have access to higher quality neighborhoods or if the LIHTC properties contribute to creating segregated pockets of minority or low-income populations.

Explore further: African-American homeownership increasingly less stable and more risky

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Perthites wanted for study on the Aussie lingo

10 minutes ago

We all know that Australians speak English differently from the way it's spoken in the UK or the US, and many of us are aware that Perth people have a slightly different version of the language from, say, Melbournians - but ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

AWaB
2.5 / 5 (4) Jan 04, 2013
I wouldn't consider giving anyone the opportunity to live in the projects of any city as 'help'!
VendicarD
3 / 5 (6) Jan 04, 2013
That is because the "projects" as implemented in the U.S. are such dismal failures.

Like everything else, you have to look to Europe for success, and look to the U.S. for every imaginable form of failure.

jonnyboy
1.7 / 5 (6) Jan 04, 2013
helps them to continue to live off the rest of us like they have for 3 generations.
kochevnik
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 04, 2013
helps them to continue to live off the rest of us like they have for 3 generations.
You mean as your red state lives off the wealth of the blue states?
VendicarD
1 / 5 (1) Jan 04, 2013
Jonnyboy is going to Hell.

"Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.' They also will answer, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?' He will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least among you, you did not do for me'" (Matthew 25:41-45).

VendicarD
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 04, 2013
It is true. The Red States are parasites on the Blue States.

"You mean as your red state lives off the wealth of the blue states?" - Kochevnik

Parasites.