First 'bone' of the Milky Way identified

Jan 08, 2013
Researchers have identified the first "bone" of the Milky Way - a long tendril of dust and gas that appears dark in this infrared image from the Spitzer Space Telescope. Running horizontally along this image, the "bone" is more than 300 light-years long but only 1 or 2 light-years wide. It contains about 100,000 suns' worth of material. Credit: NASA/JPL/SSC

(Phys.org)—Our Milky Way is a spiral galaxy—a pinwheel-shaped collection of stars, gas and dust. It has a central bar and two major spiral arms that wrap around its disk. Since we view the Milky Way from the inside, its exact structure is difficult to determine.

Astronomers have identified a new structure in the Milky Way: a long tendril of dust and gas that they are calling a "bone."

"This is the first time we've seen such a delicate piece of the galactic skeleton," says lead author Alyssa Goodman of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA). Goodman presented the discovery today in a press conference at a meeting of the in Long Beach, Calif.

Other spiral galaxies also display internal bones or endoskeletons. Observations, especially at of light, have found long skinny features jutting between galaxies' . These relatively straight structures are much less massive than the curving spiral arms.

Computer simulations of show webs of filaments within spiral disks. It is very likely that the newly discovered Milky Way feature is one of these "bone-like" filaments.

Goodman and her colleagues spotted the galactic bone while studying a dust cloud nicknamed "Nessie." The central part of the "Nessie" bone was discovered in Spitzer Space Telescope data in 2010 by James Jackson (Boston University), who named it after the Loch Ness Monster. Goodman's team noticed that Nessie appears at least twice, and possibly as much as eight times, longer than Jackson's original claim.

from molecular gas show that the feature is not a chance projection of material on the sky, but instead a real feature. Not only is "Nessie" in the galactic plane, but also it extends much longer than anyone anticipated. This slender bone of the Milky Way is more than 300 light-years long but only 1 or 2 light-years wide. It contains about 100,000 suns' worth of material, and now looks more like a cosmic snake.

"This bone is much more like a fibula - the long skinny bone in your leg - than it is like the tibia, or big thick leg bone," explains Goodman.

"It's possible that the 'Nessie' bone lies within a spiral arm, or that it is part of a web connecting bolder spiral features. Our hope is that we and other astronomers will find more of these features, and use them to map the skeleton of the Milky Way in 3-D," she adds.

Explore further: Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant

More information: For more information, visit milkywaybones.org

Related Stories

A new, distant arm of the Milky Way galaxy

Jun 13, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Our Milky Way galaxy, like other spiral galaxies, has a disk with sweeping arms of stars, gas, and dust that curve around the galaxy like the arms of a huge pinwheel.

Astrophysicists map the Milky Way's 4 spiral arms

Jan 05, 2009

Iowa State University's Martin Pohl is part of a research team that has developed the first complete map of the Milky Way galaxy's spiral arms. The map shows the inner part of the Milky Way has two prominent, symmetric spiral ...

Hubble eyes a loose spiral galaxy

Nov 26, 2012

(Phys.org)—The Hubble Space Telescope has spotted the spiral galaxy ESO 499-G37, seen here against a backdrop of distant galaxies, scattered with nearby stars.

An elegant galaxy in an unusual light (w/ Video)

Sep 22, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new image taken with the powerful HAWK-I camera on ESO's Very Large Telescope at Paranal Observatory in Chile shows the beautiful barred spiral galaxy NGC 1365 in infrared light. NGC 1365 ...

Recommended for you

Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant

9 hours ago

More than four centuries after Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe first observed the supernova that bears his name, the supernova remnant it created is now a bright source of X-rays. The supersonic expansion of ...

Satellite galaxies put astronomers in a spin

Jul 24, 2014

An international team of researchers, led by astronomers at the Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg (CNRS/Université de Strasbourg), has studied 380 galaxies and shown that their small satellite galaxies almost always ...

Video: The diversity of habitable zones and the planets

Jul 24, 2014

The field of exoplanets has rapidly expanded from the exclusivity of exoplanet detection to include exoplanet characterization. A key step towards this characterization is the determination of which planets occupy the Habitable ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeddy_Mctedder
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2013
Can we call it a milkbone?
yyz
5 / 5 (3) Jan 08, 2013
"The central part of the "Nessie" bone was discovered in Spitzer Space Telescope data in 2010 by James Jackson (Boston University), who named it after the Loch Ness Monster."

I remember seeing this work posted on arXiv in 2010; the discovery paper is available here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.5492

An infrared view of the extended Nessie Nebula is available here: http://mpia.de/~r...nded.jpg
LarryD
5 / 5 (6) Jan 08, 2013
Actually I am not 'up' on this moder astro terminology. Is it called a 'bone' because it has an epiphysis/metaphysis structure at the end points? Oh I get it! Is it close to Canis Major and Sirius? All sound a bit 'Humerus' to me.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (9) Jan 09, 2013
Computer simulations of galaxy formation show webs of filaments within spiral disks. It is very likely that the newly discovered Milky Way feature is one of these "bone-like" filaments.

Unfortunately, the simulations are based on a theorectical model with very little basis in reality. No one has any experience of the formation of any galaxy since no one was around to record how any galaxy came into existence.
Therefore, the model used here is based on pure speculation of how galaxies MIGHT have formed.
One tiny little problem, for instance, would be how to account for the existence of galactic magnetic fields.

How did that arise, given the inability of the currently accepted model to account for just that small, insignificant thorn in the flesh?

Never mind the other small thorn of how the first star came into being in the first place, all by itself.