The more things change: Trait variance provides evidence of pervasive mosaic evolution

Dec 14, 2012 by Stuart Mason Dambrot feature
Results from simulated trilobite cranidial shape data. (A) Landmarks representing overall shape of cranidium (required only from half because of bilateral symmetry) and all possible length measurements between landmarks. (B) Time series of selected PC axes scores. (Upper Left) Image shows example of typical morphology from oldest sample; (Upper Right) image shows typical morphology from stratigraphically youngest sample (scale bars = 1 mm). Change in morphology is dominated by an expansion and rotation of palpebral lobes relative to rest of the cranidium. (C) Time series of individual length:length measurements, divided up into four panels showing those that were best characterized by directional change (Upper Left) (black), unbiased random walk (Upper Right) (gray), stasis (Lower Left) (white), and strongly supported trends of all types (Lower Right). Bars on right show range of means for each mode of evolution at the end of the sequence. (D) Stacked histograms showing distribution of samples of randomly selected length:length measurements where all traits in the sample show the same evolutionary mode (black) and where evolutionary mode varies across traits (gray). Number of samples taken at each sample size = 1,000. Copyright © PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1209901109

(Phys.org)—Despite evidence that phenotypic change does not always occur uniformly across all species members and lineages, single size or shape traits are often used to represent species-level change in its entirety. Recently, however, scientists in the Department of Geology at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago and at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin asked a deceptively simple question – Are (or when are) single traits adequate representations of species-level change? – and answered it by asking another: How often do single traits show conflicting patterns in the same sequence? To answer the second, they examined trait variation frequency in fossils, finding that within most lineages, evolutionary mode (the pattern of evolution, as opposed to its rate) does indeed vary across traits – and the probability of these patterns conflicting within a given lineage patterns increases in proportion to the number of traits analyzed. Moreover, the evolution of single traits may vary despite a particular mode being dominant. The researchers suggest that their findings provide evidence that widespread mosaic evolution – the tendency for different parts within species to evolve in different ways or at different rates – has occurred throughout our planet's history.

J. Hopkins (Museum für Naturkunde) and Associate Curator Scott Lidgard (Field Museum of Natural History) encountered a range of challenges when conducting their investigation. "The main challenge in testing the validity of this that single are adequate representations of species-level change is that, due to time and computational constraints, researchers are limited in just how much they can measure when describing an organism," Hopkins tells Phys.org. "Therefore, it's essentially impossible to know all aspects of change within a species through time – making it very difficult to test the assumption that a single trait, or even several traits, adequately represents change across the species."

When it came to tallying the frequency with which traits vary in evolutionary mode within fossil species lineages, Hopkins adds, the main challenge here was twofold: tabulating the data in a form that could be consistently analyzed; and determining if the dataset or methods used biased the results in any way.

The researchers addressed these challenges through a series of insights, innovations and techniques. "In reading previous work," Hopkins notes, "we realized that traits were often analyzed separately – even in the same study – and that the traits did not always show the same mode of evolution. This implied that our understanding of the evolution of species might depend critically on what traits we were looking at." Once having this insight, the scientists wanted to know how widespread this conflict was across different groups of and through time. They then decided to undertake a systematic review of all of the traits that had been measured in the fossil record to date.

"Past studies on within-lineage trends in the fossil record were conducted at different levels of spatial and temporal resolution and using different methods of analysis," Hopkins continues. "As a result, it has been difficult to synthesize findings without simply relying on the particular interpretation on any given study. Instead, we analyzed the original data from as many studies as we could find using a consistent analytical protocol – in this case, the model-selection based method developed in 2006 and 2007 by Gene Hunt at the Smithsonian." The model-selection technique is very powerful because it gave the scientists a way to compare numerous studies in a consistent and rigorous way.

One of the study's findings was that within the majority of , evolutionary mode varies across traits and the likelihood of conflicting within-lineage patterns increases with the number of traits analyzed. "Some traits show directional change – for example, an increase in tooth size over time – while others traits change randomly, show little change or stasis, Hopkins explains. "However, traits do not always show the same patterns of change – they frequently do not change in a coordinated fashion, even within the same lineage. Therefore, the more traits researchers measure from a single lineage, the more likely they are to see conflict in patterns of change amongst traits."

Another important result was that single traits may show variation in evolutionary mode even in situations where the overall morphological evolution of the lineage is dominated by one type of mode. "Sometimes evolutionary change within a species is dominated by a particular mode of evolution – for example, overall, a species may stay relatively the same in size and shape through time," says Hopkins. "However, there are often situations where a few traits change even though the rest do not."

Perhaps the study's key finding is that its results validate the idea that morphological patterns of mosaic evolution are pervasive across groups of organisms throughout Earth's history. ".Our results show that the frequency for different parts within species to evolve in different ways is high. Because this dataset included representatives from all different types of organisms that were sampled throughout the last 500 million years of the record, including mammals, fish, mollusks, and single-celled marine plankton, our results imply that mosaic evolution is ubiquitous."

Moving forward, Hopkins concludes, "We're currently looking in more detail at data collection methods and expanding our inquiry to include additional and more complicated models of evolution."

Explore further: Modern genetics confirm ancient relationship between fins and hands

More information: Evolutionary mode routinely varies among morphological traits within fossil species lineages, PNAS Published online before print November 26, 2012, doi:10.1073/pnas.1209901109

Related Stories

Study questions 'cost of complexity' in evolution

Mar 31, 2008

Higher organisms do not have a “cost of complexity” — or slowdown in the evolution of complex traits — according to a report by researchers at Yale and Washington University in Nature.

UCSD Biologists Find New Evidence for One-Way Evolution

Jan 18, 2006

By tracing the 30-million year history of variation in a gene found in plants such as tomatoes and tobacco, biologists at the University of California, San Diego have found new evidence to support an old idea ...

Recommended for you

Scientists target mess from Christmas tree needles

19 hours ago

The presents are unwrapped. The children's shrieks of delight are just a memory. Now it's time for another Yuletide tradition: cleaning up the needles that are falling off your Christmas tree.

Top Japan lab dismisses ground-breaking stem cell study

Dec 26, 2014

Japan's top research institute on Friday hammered the final nail in the coffin of what was once billed as a ground-breaking stem cell study, dismissing it as flawed and saying the work could have been fabricated.

Research sheds light on what causes cells to divide

Dec 24, 2014

When a rapidly-growing cell divides into two smaller cells, what triggers the split? Is it the size the growing cell eventually reaches? Or is the real trigger the time period over which the cell keeps growing ...

Locking mechanism found for 'scissors' that cut DNA

Dec 24, 2014

Researchers at Johns Hopkins have discovered what keeps an enzyme from becoming overzealous in its clipping of DNA. Since controlled clipping is required for the production of specialized immune system proteins, ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeddy_Mctedder
1 / 5 (2) Dec 14, 2012
maybe this explains the utter purposelessness of genetic studies that try to nail down the specific changes of genes that lead to complex multigenic aspects of humanity such as sexuality or intelligence. even if they find something with promise in a small population of people, there could be other changes in the general population that are accounting for various observed changes in the nebulous observed behavioral l concepts we understand as 'phenotypes' such as sexuality and intelligence, -=----phenotypys far more complex than say --height or eye color.
Jaeherys
not rated yet Dec 15, 2012
Phenotypes are far more complex than you understand them to be. Putting it simply, individual cell types have phenotypes, mRNA have phenotypes (alternate splicing), organs have phenotypes, etc, etc. External stimuli change the phenotype of a cell like that of liver cells after alcohol consumption or cultured cells after trypsinization. Gene expression is changed and therefore cell function and phenotype may change, e.g. differentiation of the common lymphoid progenitor into B-cells. I don't know if at one point in time phenotype was specifically only related to the visible traits of an organism but currently that would not be correct.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
not rated yet Dec 15, 2012
My immediate reflection is on the mosaic evolution in some of Hominidae, especially hominins. Australopithecines were crazy assemblages of traits.
JVK
1 / 5 (1) Dec 16, 2012
@"...expanding our inquiry to include additional and more complicated models of evolution."

The most complicated model of evolution is one where the epigenetic effects of nutrient chemicals and pheromone-controlled reproduction are detailed from the bottom-up level -- via examination of the microRNA / messenger RNA balance that is required for cell level and organism level homeostasis -- to the top-down epigenetic effects of food and pheromones on genes and behavior. Fortunately, the most complicated model is also the most obvious model of adaptive evolution via ecological, social, neurogenic, and socio-cognitive niche construction that details how "Olfaction and odor receptors provide a clear evolutionary trail that can be followed from unicellular organisms to insects to humans." http://dx.doi.org...i0.17338 Unfortunately, this model may be too complicated for most people to grasp in its entirety despite its accurate representations of cause and effect across species.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.