Was the sauropod dinosaurs' large size due to plant food? Scientists argue old idea still has legs

Dec 11, 2012

The long necked sauropod dinosaurs were the largest land animals ever to walk the Earth – but why were they so large? A decade ago a team of plant ecologists from South Africa suggested that this was due to the nature of the plant food they ate, however these ideas have fallen out of favour with many dinosaur researchers. Now Liverpool John Moores University's (LJMU's) Dr David Wilkinson and Professor Graeme Ruxton of University of St Andrews, Scotland, argue that this idea still has legs.

The results have been published in the journal published by the British Ecological Society this month. They suggest that this mistake happened because some scientists confused two different issues in thinking about this problem; namely how much energy is in the plant with how much nitrogen is in the plant – the South African ideas were based on not the total energy in the plant food.

Dr Wilkinson and Professor Ruxton now argue that this South African idea about long necked being large based on the nature of the plant food they ate, is still a contender for explaining their size. As well as arguing that these ideas have been prematurely discarded the new work goes on the further develop this theory.

Dr David M Wilkinson who is an from the LJMU School of Natural Sciences and Psychology explains: "This new study makes a first attempt to calculate in more detail the implications of this idea. It suggests that it may have been to the advantage of young sauropods trying to get enough nitrogen to have a metabolism rather like modern mammals, but that this would have been impossible for the adults because of the danger of such large animals overheating from all the heat that such a metabolism would have produced."

"Alternatively - or in addition - it would also have been potentially beneficial for the young to be carnivorous, as this would also have helped them access more nitrogen. The large adults plausibly used their size to help process large amounts of to access enough scarce nitrogen, as suggested in the original 2002 study. However this would potentially have caused them to have to take in more energy than they needed. A mammal (and possibly also small ) would get rid of this surplus as heat, but this would not be possible for a really large dinosaur. Potentially they may have laid down fat reserves instead. So one can even speculate that they may have had humps of fat rather like modern-day camels."

Explore further: Greek archaeology site sparks intense interest (Update)

More information: David M. Wilkinson and Graeme D. Ruxton (2012). 'High C/N ratio (not low-energy content) of vegetation may have driven gigantism in sauropod dinosaurs and perhaps omnivory and/or endothermy in their juveniles', doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12033, is published in Functional Ecology on Wednesday 12 December 2012. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12033/full

Related Stories

Found: First complete remains of early sauropod dinosaur

Oct 28, 2010

Scientists have discovered in China the first complete skeleton of a pivotal ancestor of Earth's largest land animals – the sauropod dinosaurs. The new species, tentatively dubbed Yizhousaurus sunae, lived ...

Plant-eating dinosaur discovered in Antarctica

Dec 19, 2011

For the first time, the presence of large bodied herbivorous dinosaurs in Antarctica has been recorded. Until now, remains of sauropoda - one of the most diverse and geographically widespread species of herbivorous dinosaurs ...

Teeth study shows big dinosaurs trekked for food

Oct 26, 2011

What did giant plant-munching dinosaurs do when they couldn't find enough to eat in the parched American West? They hit the road. An analysis of fossilized teeth adds further evidence that the long-necked ...

Rule reveals CO2 emissions of plant life

Jan 26, 2006

Minnesota researchers have found a universal rule regulating plant metabolism that may also offer a key to calculating plants' carbon dioxide emissions.

Recommended for you

Fossil arthropod went on the hunt for its prey

2 hours ago

A new species of carnivorous crustacean has been identified, which roamed the seas 435 million years ago, grasping its prey with spiny limbs before devouring it. The fossil is described and details of its lifestyle are published ...

Jurassic Welsh mammals were picky eaters, study finds

Aug 20, 2014

For most people, mere mention of the word Jurassic conjures up images of huge dinosaurs chomping their way through lush vegetation – and each other. However, mammals and their immediate ancestors were also ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Sinister1811
1 / 5 (5) Dec 12, 2012
I believe, at that time, there was an evolutionary arms race between the world's tallest trees and various sauropod dinosaurs. Perhaps that could've contributed to their enormous size. But, if that were the case, then I can't understand why we don't see anything similar with today's herbivorous animals.
Moebius
1.7 / 5 (6) Dec 12, 2012
More likely it was the same reason bugs were huge. Higher oxygen content of the atmosphere. Or maybe they evolved bigger to keep from being sucked dry by giant mosquito's ;)
Jonseer
1 / 5 (3) Dec 12, 2012
, if that were the case, then I can't understand why we don't see anything similar with today's herbivorous animals.


You do.

Two examples are Giraffes and Elephants, HOWEVER, as the article explains being warm-blooded they can only get so big before they can't properly control their temperature.

While some Dinos are thought to have been warm-blooded. Apparently this is not though to be the case with sauropods at least as adults.

ALSO ONE LITTLE KNOWN FACT ABOUT DINOS AND BIRDS AND REPTILES that makes a HUGE difference.

Unlike mammals, they do NOT have a fixed # of vertebra.

This made the evolution of the very functional extremely long neck much easier for the dinos.

A giraffe as tall as it is, has the same # of vertebra as humans.