Intel smartphone chips as energy-efficient as competitors', report concludes

Dec 18, 2012 by Steve Johnson

In a milestone that is expected to help Intel's push into the smartphone and tablet markets, the Santa Clara, Calif., tech giant finally has made its brainy microchips as energy-efficient as those from companies using a design by Britain-based ARM Holdings, which now dominate the mobile market, according to a new report.

That's important for Intel, which for years got the cold shoulder from phone and tablet makers because its power-hungry chips shortened the of . With its new chips, Intel could find its way into a few more of those gadgets, the study by Bernstein Research analysts said Monday.

But they cautioned that the development doesn't mean the world's biggest chipmaker is headed for a huge boost in revenue.

Bernstein noted that the ARM camp has such a commanding lead in phones and tablets that Intel probably won't make much of a dent in those markets for a couple of years - even with its energy-efficient chips.

Moreover, Bernstein determined that the performance of ARM-based chips has increased enough to be suitable for low-end notebooks, which could begin to challenge Intel's dominance in the .

Both chip types "are very close in terms of and ," the report concluded. As a result, it said, "the competitive fight between the ARM and Intel camps will therefore heat up meaningfully as early as 2013, with likely damages on both sides and no winner."

For its study, Bernstein compared Intel's chip in a phone and a RAZR phone with an ARM chip. It also compared both chips in similar tablets outfitted with the Windows 8 operating system.

"In smartphones, Intel is competitive in terms of power efficiency," the analysts concluded, and the company "poses a credible threat to ARM's dominance" in tablets.

But it also said ARM's chips have become more powerful, making them "a very compelling choice" for consumers looking for low-end notebooks.

"Overall, there is no stand-out difference in power efficiency or performance between the two camps," the report said, adding that it all points to "more direct competition" between Intel and the ARM chipmakers.

Nathan Brookwood, of the market consulting firm Insight 64, agreed that Intel will have trouble making headway in mobile devices. Besides its late start in those markets, he noted, the dominant suppliers-Samsung and Apple - prefer to make their own chips. In addition, he said, other mobile-device makers like ARM chips because it's often easier to mix and match certain features with them than with the kind Intel sells.

Another problem for Intel is that ARM chips tend to be cheaper, so the company may need to cut its prices - and its profit - to compete, according to a note Raymond James analysts sent their clients.

They said Intel's gross margins - money left over from revenue after accounting for the cost of goods sold - have been 62 percent to 65 percent in recent years. But as Intel ramps up its competition with ARM chipmakers, the analysts warned, "mid-50 percent gross margins are an increasing reality."

Explore further: Technology to reduce network switches in cluster supercomputers by 40 percent

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Intel launches chip for tablet computers

Apr 11, 2011

Intel Corp. has launched a new chip for tablet computers, Atom processor Z670 based platform, as the world's most powerful semiconductor company aims to become a contender in the market for mobile chips.

Intel makes more inroads in mobile market with new phones

Feb 27, 2012

Further demonstrating its resolve to expand beyond the personal computer market, Intel Corp. on Monday announced that three more new smartphones incorporating its microprocessors will be introduced in other countries this ...

Intel fights to keep customers from defecting

Jul 17, 2012

Some of chip colossus Intel's biggest customers and partners are exploring a competing microprocessor design, signaling the start of a much-anticipated tech donnybrook that analysts say could trigger a dramatic shift in the ...

Intel workers have Android Jelly Bean on Atom phones

Sep 14, 2012

(Phys.org)—Intel watchers by now understand the quick version of Intel's to-do list: Join and grow up in smartphone market universe, fire up Ultrabooks and, by both means, show better profit outlook. Intel ...

Recommended for you

Google made failed bid for Spotify

2 hours ago

Internet titan Google tried last year to buy streaming music service Spotify but backed off for reasons including a whopping price tag, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.

Thieves got into 1K StubHub accounts

3 hours ago

(AP)—Cyber thieves got into more than 1,000 StubHub customers' accounts and fraudulently bought tickets for events through the online ticket reseller, a law enforcement official and the company said Tuesday.

Microsoft CEO sees 'bold' plan as 4Q tops Street

3 hours ago

(AP)—Microsoft Corp. CEO Satya Nadella painted an upbeat vision of the future Tuesday, saying that the next version of Windows will be unified across screens of all sizes and that two money-losing units—Nokia ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

VendicarD
not rated yet Dec 18, 2012
While there is no "standout difference" in operational power, ARM still has a standout difference in standby power. What is protecting Intel is the energy drain of other components that as a percentage can make up the major power drain on the system.

This is why ARM has gone to an non-symmetric design to it's low power multicore CPU's. Providing an ultra-low power and very low core to run in standby mode, and 1 or more higher power consumption and higher computational power core for user applications.

In these standby environments Intel is coming in with core power consumption 100 times that of ARM.

ARM is a significantly cleaner design, and will ultimately produce a more powerful compute architecture. GodSon will do the same.

Intel has an ARM license and could easily compete directly in the ARM market, but has no real interest in doing so, since they would lose the leverage - now growing ever msller - of compatibility with the legacy x86 instruction set.

Be gone x86.. Be gone.