Judge clears BP's $7.8 bn settlement in US oil spill

Dec 22, 2012
Fire boats battle the blazing remnants of the off-shore oil rig Deepwater Horizon April 21, 2010. British oil giant BP won US court approval of a $7.8 billion settlement with people and businesses who lost money and property due to the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

British oil giant BP won approval Friday from a US federal judge of a $7.8 billion settlement with people and businesses who lost money and property due to the 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Although the deal addresses the bulk of private claims over the Deepwater Horizon and the oil spill that resulted from its explosion, it does not affect an anticipated tens of billions of dollars in fines and claims from the US government and impacted coastal states and .

Nor does it resolve suits filed by shareholders or others seeking compensation because of a drilling moratorium imposed after the worst environmental disaster in US history. The incident also killed 11 workers.

US Carl Barbier gave his final approval to the settlement in a 125-page ruling. He had preliminarily approved the accord in May.

"None of the objections, whether filed on the objections docket or elsewhere, have shown the settlement to be anything other than fair, reasonable and adequate," Barbier wrote.

He said the "provides compensation to class members that appears sufficient" to cover their losses from the spill.

Graphic on the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the US that killed 11 oil rig workers and spilled 4.9 million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico.

Both BP and the plaintiff's attorneys welcomed the approval of a deal that would settle nearly 100,000 claims from fishermen and others affected by the disaster.

BP hailed the decision, saying it resolved "the substantial majority of legitimate economic loss and property damage claims stemming from the Deepwater Horizon accident."

"We believe the settlement, which avoids years of lengthy litigation, is good for the people, businesses and communities of the Gulf and is in the best interests of BP's stakeholders," the company added.

Attorneys Steve Herman and Jim Roy, who represent the plaintiffs, also praised the deal.

"This settlement has—and will continue to—bring the people and businesses of the Gulf the relief they deserve," they wrote in a statement cited by US media.

BP has said the settlement is not expected to result in any increase of the $37.2 billion charge it posted to cover the cost of the massive spill that blackened beaches in five US states and devastated the Gulf Coast's tourism and fishing industries.

It took 87 days to cap BP's runaway well 5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below the water surface off the coast of Louisiana as it spewed some 4.9 million barrels (206 million gallons) of oil into the .

Barbier—an expert in maritime law charged with consolidating hundreds of spill-related lawsuits into the single case—has left the door open to some shared liability in key pre-trial rulings.

Several government probes have already castigated BP, rig operator Transocean and Halliburton—which was responsible for the well's faulty cement job—for cutting corners and missing crucial warning signs.

Explore further: Pacific leaders say climate will claim entire nations

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

BP seals $7.8 bn settlement in US oil spill

Apr 18, 2012

Oil giant BP said Wednesday it has finalized a $7.8 billion deal to settle thousands of claims from fishermen and others affected by the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill.

BP settlement over US spill will not end legal drama

Mar 03, 2012

Oil giant BP's agreement of a $7.8 billion settlement for victims of the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill will not end its legal headaches or erase the disaster for some US southern coast residents.

BP near settlement with US over Gulf spill

Nov 15, 2012

British oil company BP said Thursday it is in advanced talks with U.S. agencies about settling criminal and other claims from the Gulf of Mexico well blowout two years ago.

Recommended for you

Tracking giant kelp from space

1 hour ago

Citizen scientists worldwide are invited to take part in marine ecology research, and they won't have to get their feet wet to do it. The Floating Forests project, an initiative spearheaded by scientists ...

Heavy metals and hydroelectricity

2 hours ago

Hydraulic engineering is increasingly relied on for hydroelectricity generation. However, redirecting stream flow can yield unintended consequences. In the August 2014 issue of GSA Today, Donald Rodbell of ...

What's wiping out the Caribbean corals?

3 hours ago

Here's what we know about white-band disease: It has already killed up to 95 percent of the Caribbean's reef-building elkhorn and staghorn corals, and it's caused by an infectious bacteria that seems to be ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

SleepTech
3.9 / 5 (7) Dec 22, 2012
"BP hailed the decision" - It wasn't nearly enough then.
Shootist
2 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2012
"BP hailed the decision" - It wasn't nearly enough then.


Idiot.

If the government is in the business of graft, theft and corruption, why are such things illegal?
FrankHerbert
2.5 / 5 (8) Dec 22, 2012
If the government is in the business of graft, theft and corruption, why are such things illegal?
Care to provide examples, dumbass?

The US government has every right to forcibly dissolve BP, at gunpoint if necessary.
Howhot
2.3 / 5 (3) Dec 23, 2012
Not only did BP run a corrupt drilling operation, they ran a corrupt business practice that developed a corrupt anti-environment culture that didn't care what people thought about them or their oil extraction methods. Business as usual.

BP destroyed the whole of the Gulf of Mexico in one shot. One phrase was on there minds, "Do it cheaper".

I don't think the engineering is ready these 5-mile under the ocean drills. I think it's been proven.