Benefits, risks of using geoengineering to counter climate change

Dec 13, 2012 by Alvin Powell
In a talk sponsored by the Harvard University Center for the Environment, Edward Parson, a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, discussed the myriad ways nations could combat global warming, such as releasing cooling aerosols. Credit: Kris Snibbe/Harvard Staff Photographer

If they wanted to, nations around the world could release globe-cooling aerosols into the atmosphere or undertake other approaches to battle climate change, an authority on environmental law said Monday. He recommended international discussions on a regulatory scheme to govern such geoengineering approaches.

Under international law, nations can research and deploy such approaches on their own territory, on that of consenting nations, and on the high seas, said Edward Parson, a at the University of California, Los Angeles. Despite that freedom, research into climate engineering remains stalled while opposition from environmental groups, fearful of unintended consequences, is growing,

Parson gave an overview on the policy challenges of climate engineering during a talk titled "International Governance of Climate Engineering" at the Science Center Monday evening. The session was part of a new series co-sponsored by the Harvard University Center for the Environment and the MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of .

Although several geoengineering approaches are feasible, Parson focused on one he said could be deployed most rapidly: spraying cooling high into the atmosphere. Nature has already proven such an approach to be effective. When volcanoes erupt, they spew that reflect the sun's radiation. Large eruptions can result in global-cooling events, volcanic winters lasting up to several years.

The approach would be fast and cheap but imperfect, Parson said. Aerosols could be sprayed from airplanes relatively inexpensively, for billions of dollars, with costs dropping. It would be an imperfect approach, Parson said, because although spraying aerosols would cool the Earth, it would not be a permanent fix. The effort would do nothing to stop the driving forces of warming: the emission of . Also, the tactic would last only a year or two, and it wouldn't address climate change's other effects, such as acidification of the oceans and ecological changes.

Still, Parson said, the effort could mitigate climate effects that are rapidly worsening, or, more strategically, it could "shave the peak" from the worst warming while the world transitions to low-carbon energy, or it could be employed on a regional scale to mitigate localized problems, such as limiting the melting of sea ice during the Arctic summer or reducing sea surface warming in the regions where hurricanes form.

Of course, the prospect of such offbeat approaches also raises the specter of incompetent, negligent, or even malicious uses, Parson said. One of the largest potential threats involving climate engineering could come from nations' militaries looking to ease domestic conditions at a neighbor's expense.

International regulations could be drafted by the dozen or two dozen nations capable of carrying out such programs, Parson said. He suggested that such regulations should ban research that might have large-scale impact while allowing more responsible, smaller-scale work to proceed. He also advocated requirements for transparency and disclosure of results.

Parson said it is important to find out whether techniques can have a regional or global impact, and how much they might be fine-tuned to address local or regional problems. It also will be important to determine where nations' interests lie. If their goals are aligned, he said, creating and executing a regulatory scheme will be far easier to do.

Though it may be difficult to get intransigent nations to the table, as their fear over rises, so will their willingness to negotiate, he suggested.

"Nothing is politically impossible, contingent on the current level of alarm," Parson said.

Explore further: Solar energy-driven process could revolutionize oil sands tailings reclamation

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Testing geoengineering

Oct 26, 2011

Solar radiation management is a class of theoretical concepts for manipulating the climate in order to reduce the risks of global warming caused by greenhouse gasses. But its potential effectiveness and risks are uncertain, ...

A volcanic idea to reverse climate change

Aug 22, 2011

Scientists believe that our warming world may face catastrophic changes to its natural environment, including droughts, rising oceans and fiercer, more frequent hurricanes.

Effects of sea spray geoengineering on global climate

Feb 14, 2012

Anthropogenic climate warming is leading to consideration of options for geoengineering to offset rising carbon dioxide levels. One potential technique involves injecting artificial sea spray into the atmosphere. The sea ...

Recommended for you

Big changes in the Sargasso Sea

9 hours ago

Over one thousand miles wide and three thousand miles long, the Sargasso Sea occupies almost two thirds of the North Atlantic Ocean. Within the sea, circling ocean currents accumulate mats of Sargassum seawee ...

Water-quality trading can reduce river pollution

9 hours ago

Allowing polluters to buy, sell or trade water-quality credits could significantly reduce pollution in river basins and estuaries faster and at lower cost than requiring the facilities to meet compliance costs on their own, ...

Managing land into the future

13 hours ago

Food production is the backbone of New Zealand's economy—and a computer modelling programme designed by a Victoria University of Wellington academic is helping ensure that farming practices here and overseas ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

cantdrive85
2 / 5 (4) Dec 13, 2012
Geoengineering with aerosols has been going on since at least the mid nineties, and it's only made it hotter.