3Qs: Doomsday predictions debunked

Dec 21, 2012 by Linda Ogbevoen
Toyoko Orimoto, an assistant professor of physics, says that we should be more concerned with climate change than judgment day, which the Mayan calendar predicts will take place on Friday. Credit: istockphoto

Some people are not making plans for the New Year. From hiding in bomb shel­ters to sharp­ening their sur­vival skills, doomsday the­o­rists are preparing for judg­ment day, which the Mayan cal­endar pre­dicts will take place on Friday. Toyoko Ori­moto is an assis­tant pro­fessor of physics in the Col­lege of Sci­ence and a member of the Com­pact Muon Sole­noid col­lab­o­ra­tion at the Large Hadron Collider—the world's most pow­erful par­ticle accelerator—at CERN, the Euro­pean Orga­ni­za­tion for Nuclear Research, in Geneva, Switzer­land. Here, she explains what a poten­tial end of days sce­nario would look like and why we should be more con­cerned about cli­mate change.

As a scientist, are you bothered by unscientific claims of apocalyptic events? What is the most far-fetched doomsday scenario that you have heard?

I don't know if "both­ered" is the right word. For the most part, I tend to ignore unsci­en­tific claims about most things, including doomsday events. Per­haps the most far-​​fetched doomsday sce­nario I've encoun­tered is the idea that the Large Hadron Col­lider, would create a black hole, which, in turn, would con­sume the . Of course, we've debunked this far-​​fetched hypoth­esis, as the Large Hadron Col­lider has been oper­ating smoothly for years.

An astrobiologist at NASA has debunked the rumor of the imminent destruction of the world in which a mysterious planet known as Nibiru would collide with the Earth. He said, "There is no true issue here. This is just manufactured fantasy." But pretend for a moment that an end of days scenario were to play out. What would it look like?

A real­istic doomsday sce­nario would be that of an asteroid hit­ting the Earth. Craters on the Earth sug­gest that such inci­dents have in fact occurred in the past. Per­haps the most famous asteroid is the one that hit the Earth 65 mil­lion years ago and is hypoth­e­sized to have trig­gered the extinc­tion of the dinosaurs. The impact of even a small asteroid hit­ting the Earth could be devastating.

I've read for instance that if a two-​​kilometer diam­eter asteroid were to strike the Earth at some­thing like 50,000 kilo­me­ters per hour the energy released in the impact would be equiv­a­lent to that of a 1 mil­lion megaton bomb. Such a large impact would pro­duce huge tsunamis, or bring about a pro­longed period of cold weather (as is spec­u­lated to have brought upon the extinc­tion of the dinosaurs), or both. The gov­ern­ment, of course, has taken steps to ensure we could fore­tell any pos­sible impacts and has devel­oped a pro­gram to avoid such an impact.

Scientists have continued to refute claims that the world will end in 2012, but many doomsday preppers have nonetheless built arks and bomb shelters in case of the planet's catastrophic demise. Why do you think end of days scenarios are so popular among particular contingents of people?

To be honest, I have no idea. I am far more con­cerned about issues, such as cli­mate change, which we can have con­trol over, but without our inter­ven­tion could bring about dis­as­trous consequences.

Cli­mate change is poten­tially dev­as­tating simply because humans have set­tled the Earth in ways that suit what the Earth used to look like. For example, we've built cities by the ocean and farms in places where weather con­di­tions are good for crop growth. But rising sea levels can make existing pop­u­la­tion cen­ters uninhabitable—think New Orleans or New York—and rising tem­per­a­tures can make existing farm­land unpro­duc­tive. The scary thing is that these prob­lems are far more acute in devel­oping coun­tries that don't have U.S.-like resources to adapt to what changes may come, and whose pop­u­la­tions are far more eco­nom­i­cally inse­cure in any case.

Cli­mate change may not seize people's atten­tion in the same way as more implau­sible the­o­ries, because of  its gradual nature. It could be that slow changes taking place over the course of many decades do not grip the imag­i­na­tion of para­noiacs the way sudden cat­a­clysmic events can, never mind the respec­tive sci­en­tific plau­si­bility of each.

Explore further: Ig Nobel winner: Using pork to stop nosebleeds

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

3Qs: With Sandy, climate change 'loads the dice'

Nov 01, 2012

Though it's dif­fi­cult to tie a spe­cific storm like Hur­ri­cane Sandy to the phe­nom­enon of cli­mate change, Auroop Gan­guly, an asso­ciate pro­fessor of civil and envi­ron­mental engi­neering ...

Researchers study cyanobacteria infestations in waterways

Sep 24, 2012

Cyanobac­teria are among the oldest organ­isms on earth—they were the orig­inal oxygen-​​producing species and are thought to be respon­sible for the direc­tion life has taken on earth. Nonethe­less, they aren't ...

Professor works toward a better brainwave monitor

Dec 06, 2012

The elec­trical out­puts of the brain con­tain mas­sive amounts of infor­ma­tion that could be a pow­erful resource if we could fully tap into it. Our brain processes things we see before any con­scious ...

3Qs: Hot, hot heat

Jun 28, 2012

A record-​​breaking heat wave hit the East Coast last week, fol­lowed by a spate of rain and thun­der­storms. Northeastern University news office asked Auroop Gan­guly, an asso­ciate pro­fessor ...

Recommended for you

Ig Nobel winner: Using pork to stop nosebleeds

19 hours ago

There's some truth to the effectiveness of folk remedies and old wives' tales when it comes to serious medical issues, according to findings by a team from Detroit Medical Center.

History books spark latest Texas classroom battle

Sep 16, 2014

As Texas mulls new history textbooks for its 5-plus million public school students, some academics are decrying lessons they say exaggerate the influence of Christian values on America's Founding Fathers.

Flatow, 'Science Friday' settle claims over grant

Sep 16, 2014

Federal prosecutors say radio host Ira Flatow and his "Science Friday" show that airs on many National Public Radio stations have settled civil claims that they misused money from a nearly $1 million federal ...

User comments : 0