Researcher points to Sun as likely source of eighth-century 'Charlemagne event'

Nov 30, 2012

(Phys.org)—Until recently, the years 774 and 775 were best known for Charlemagne's victory over the Lombards. But earlier this year, a team of scientists in Japan discovered a baffling spike in carbon-14 deposits within the rings of cedar trees that matched those same years. Because cosmic rays are tied to carbon-14 concentrations, scientists around the world have wondered about the cause: a nearby supernova, a gamma ray burst in the Milky Way or an intense superflare emanating from the Sun?

Now, Adrian Melott, professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Kansas and Brian Thomas, KU alumnus and professor of physics and astronomy at Washburn University, have examined the evidence and zeroed in on the likely source of the medieval cosmic ray —a from the Sun.

Melott said the scientists, who originally discovered the carbon-14 spike and published their findings in the , miscalculated the implied intensity of such an event, and they mistakenly ruled out the Sun as the cause of the radiation detected for the years 774-775.

"What they concluded was that the energy emitted by the Sun would have had to have been, say, 1,000 times larger than the Carrington event—the greatest ever known," Melott said. "We just observed this simple mistake and corrected it, and the answer came out that it would be 10 or 20 times greater than the Carrington event in 1859. That means that this may be a more reasonable explanation. The Carrington event is the greatest in the last 200 years, and this would be the greatest thing in the last 1,300 years or so, so it becomes more reasonable."

In addition, Melott noted that recent observations of stars similar to the Sun made by the satellite suggest that they are flaring at levels similar to that which they suggest—and higher—at average intervals of a few hundred to thousand years.

Other explanations for the medieval radiation burst are highly improbable, according to the KU researcher. For instance, the scientists who discovered the carbon-14 spike ruled out the possibility of a nearby galactic supernova as a source, and Melott agrees with their conclusion.

"A supernova is basically a star that comes to the end of its life and produces a spectacular explosion," said Melott. "But in order to produce effects like the ones seen in the tree rings, such a supernova would have had to have been within 100 light years or so. Such an event would have been blindingly bright in the sky, much brighter than a full moon. It would have been bright like that for months and could not have failed to be noted by every civilization on Earth. Being so close, there would be remnants of the explosion visible today, still expanding. Something so close could not have been missed."

Melott believes a third possibility for the 774-775 burst of cosmic energy—a gamma ray burst—should have been considered by the original authors, even though he deemed it unlikely.

"A comes from a small fraction of supernovae," he said. "They result in a beaming of the radiation into two narrow searchlight beams going out in opposite directions from the event. Now, because the radiation is so columnated, they can nail you from quite far away. They could be hundreds or even thousands of light years away and still nail us with enough radiation to produce the carbon-14 spike. It's a possibility, but not a likely possibility, because these things happen with intervals of 10-15 million years on average. Is it likely that such a burst would have happened 1,200 years ago? Rare events do happen, but it would be very surprising. I don't think it's a likely explanation."

Returning to the more-likely solar event, Melott said that something similar to the Charlemagne event would have disastrous consequences for today's technology-dependent world. He said such an event could occur every one or two thousand years, but unpredictably and with only a few hours' warning.

"You'd get a slight increase in skin cancer rates because of effects on the ozone layer," said Melott. "You'd get a little bit of damage to food crops, but that's not too serious—and it wasn't for the Holy Roman Empire either. But we have a problem they didn't, which is our technological level. When these things hit, the Earth's magnetic field undergoes an interaction, and the magnetic field lines move, and that produces a current in wires. If you have a long power line, you can get a huge current. Transformers get overloaded, and they burn out. And you can lose a lot of transformers. Imagine the lights going off all over the developed world—not to come on for who knows how long—because you have to build more transformers. And how to you do that without electricity? It's a real problem to prepare for it."

Work by Melott and Thomas will appear online via Nature magazine.

Explore further: Thermonuclear X-ray bursts on neutron stars set speed record

Related Stories

Red Crucifix sighting in 774 may have been supernova

Jun 30, 2012

(Phys.org) -- A supernova may have actually been the mysterious "Red Crucifix" in the sky that is cited in the Anglo Saxon Chronicle for the year 774. New correspondence between a university student and Nature carries intere ...

Fear no supernova

Dec 16, 2011

Given the incredible amounts of energy in a supernova explosion – as much as the sun creates during its entire lifetime – another erroneous doomsday theory is that such an explosion could happen ...

1859 solar flare, ozone depletion studied

Mar 22, 2007

U.S. scientists believe an 1859 solar flare destroyed more of the Earth's ozone than did a 1989 solar flare -- the strongest ever monitored by satellite.

Recommended for you

How can we find tiny particles in exoplanet atmospheres?

13 hours ago

It may seem like magic, but astronomers have worked out a scheme that will allow them to detect and measure particles ten times smaller than the width of a human hair, even at many light-years distance.  ...

Spitzer telescope witnesses asteroid smashup

Aug 28, 2014

(Phys.org) —NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has spotted an eruption of dust around a young star, possibly the result of a smashup between large asteroids. This type of collision can eventually lead to the ...

Witnessing the early growth of a giant

Aug 27, 2014

Astronomers have uncovered for the first time the earliest stages of a massive galaxy forming in the young Universe. The discovery was made possible through combining observations from the NASA/ESA Hubble ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

verkle
2.3 / 5 (3) Nov 30, 2012
and it wasn't for the Holy Roman Empire either.

Wait, the Holy Roman Empire didn't start for another 200 years after this event.

IronhorseA
1 / 5 (1) Nov 30, 2012
and it wasn't for the Holy Roman Empire either.

Wait, the Holy Roman Empire didn't start for another 200 years after this event.


Officially it started in 800 AD when the pope crowned Charlemagne.
ValeriaT
1 / 5 (9) Nov 30, 2012
The solar flare events are indeed weaker but they're faster too. The graph of this event is way too relaxed for solar flare event and it's widespread over the span of multiple years. So I wouldn't dismiss the supernova-based explanation so fast. BTW The giant solar flare connected with global blackout is the most probable form of 2012 doom, which we may expect in connection to the Mayan prophecy.
yyz
4.3 / 5 (12) Nov 30, 2012
"The giant solar flare connected with global blackout is the most probable form of 2012 doom, which we may expect in connection to the Mayan prophecy."

There is no Mayan apocalyptic prophecy and there never was. It's a purely 20th century marketing invention: http://www.2012ho...ediction
Screeching Demon
1 / 5 (2) Nov 30, 2012
"Imagine the lights going off all over the developed world—not to come on for who knows how long—because you have to build more transformers. And how to you do that without electricity? It's a real problem to prepare for it."

This didn't seem to be a problem for Nikola Tesla.. Are we that dependant on electricity that nobody knows how to hand wind transformers anymore? Oh and here's a thought for the braindead engineers out there: Prepare for such an event by making extra now, or better yet shield the wire just like a regular coaxial cable! Sure, it may cost extra, but a devastating solar event is not a matter of if, but when. It will save us major hassles and precious dollars in the long run.
Mannstein
not rated yet Dec 01, 2012
Put vanadium flow batteries on stand by and after the big event occurs turn on the batteries.
dan42day
3 / 5 (4) Dec 02, 2012
Imagine the lights going off all over the developed world—not to come on for who knows how long—because you have to build more transformers. And how to you do that without electricity? It's a real problem to prepare for it.


Some wires will burn out, some circuit breakers will pop, some, not all transformers will also burn out. Even in the worst of the worst case scenarios, there would not be a shortage of electrical equipment so severe as to make manufacturing more equipment impossible or particularily difficult. Don't forget all the spare stuff lying around that wouldn't be affected at all.

Still be a pain in the ass though.
PeterD
1 / 5 (2) Dec 02, 2012
The bigger problem is that a solar flare would fry every computer in it's path, and since everything now runs on computers, that will be really bad.
barakn
not rated yet Dec 11, 2012
Pure FUD, PeterD. The EM waves from a coronal mass ejection that make it through our atmosphere are extremely low frequency/ large wavelength. The large wavelength means they are best absorbed by long metallic objects like power transmission lines and fences. Computers will be affected by power outages, but will fire up once the power is back on.