Petraeus case fuels fresh debate on online privacy (Update)

Nov 14, 2012 by Rob Lever
A man checks servers in a data center in 2008. The investigation that toppled CIA chief David Petraeus has sparked fresh debate over online privacy and the government's ability to snoop into private email accounts.

The investigation that toppled CIA chief David Petraeus has sparked fresh debate over online privacy and the government's ability to snoop into private email accounts.

"When the CIA director cannot hide his activities online, what hope is there for the rest of us?" said Chris Soghoian of the American Civil Liberties Union's Privacy and Technology Project.

"This should also serve as a warning, by demonstrating the extent to which the government can pierce the veil of communications anonymity without ever having to obtain a search warrant or other court order from a neutral judge."

Petraeus resigned last week when it became clear that his affair with 40-year-old military reservist Paula Broadwell, his biographer, would become public.

FBI agents stumbled on the liaison after a complaint from Jill Kelley—a close friend of both Petraeus and Allen—who told a federal agent that she had received threatening emails, which investigators later traced to Broadwell.

"It is troubling because we don't know what permissions were granted," said James Lewis, head of the Technology and Public Policy Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Lewis said it was unclear if Broadwell was made aware of her rights, before agreeing to allow FBI agents to access her emails.

He said even spy agencies such as the National Security Agency, when hunting for terrorists, must meet "very precise legal conditions" before obtaining email access.

A computer workstation bears the National Security Agency (NSA) logo inside the Threat Operations Center at Fort Meade, Maryland. Even spy agencies such as the National Security Agency, when hunting for terrorists, must meet "very precise legal conditions" before obtaining email access.

"We need to be clear on the rules for looking at emails without a warrant. The basic rule should be no court approval, no investigation," Lewis said.

It was not immediately clear what methods the FBI used in the probe. Some reports suggest FBI agents may have obtained a court order which allowed access to Broadwell's Gmail account.

Google said this week in its semiannual Transparency Report that the number of government requests to hand over data from users was on the rise.

In the first half of 2012, Google received 20,938 requests for data from government entities around the world, including 7,969 from the United States. Google complied in 90 percent of those cases.

Julian Sanchez, a research fellow at the libertarian Cato Institute, said the case appears to have led the FBI on a "fishing expedition" which eventually led to Petraeus and later to top General John Allen for emails linked to people in the scandal.

"It's not clear what authority the FBI had, or what the probable cause was," said Sanchez, noting that it's not yet clear if any crime was committed.

"It seems like an abuse of investigative powers."

The investigation that toppled CIA chief David Petraeus, pictured in January 2012, has sparked fresh debate over online privacy and the government's ability to snoop into private email accounts.

The mushrooming scandal is expected to give new impetus to proposals in Congress, including a bill from Senator Patrick Leahy, to require a court warrant based on probable cause in order to get email contents from Internet firms.

The ACLU's Soghoian said the Petraeus case underscores the need for stricter legislation.

"It's a reminder that the legal protections for email fall far short of what they should be," he said in a blog post.

Gregory Nojeim, senior counsel at the Washington-based Center for Democracy & Technology, said the case may cause lawmakers to finally wake up to the issue of digital privacy.

"The Petraeus investigation shows that it's critically important to have strong privacy protections for email and other electronic communications," he said.

"Without them, investigations can rapidly broaden and snare others far removed from the original target, and maybe veer out of control."

Explore further: Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Official requests up for Web data: Google

Nov 13, 2012

Google said Tuesday the number of government requests to hand over data from users or to take down Web content rose in the first six months of 2012, extending a trend of recent years.

FBI access to e-mail, Web data raises privacy fear

Jul 30, 2010

(AP) -- Invasion of privacy in the Internet age. Expanding the reach of law enforcement to snoop on e-mail traffic or on Web surfing. Those are among the criticisms being aimed at the FBI as it tries to update ...

Court lets stand telecom immunity in wiretap case

Oct 09, 2012

(AP)—The Supreme Court is leaving in place a federal law that gives telecommunications companies legal immunity for helping the government with its email and telephone eavesdropping program.

Court OKs immunity for telecoms in wiretap case

Dec 30, 2011

A federal appeals court has ruled as constitutional a law giving telecommunications companies legal immunity for helping the government with its email and telephone eavesdropping program.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

10 hours ago

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

Yelp to pay US fine for child privacy violation

17 hours ago

Online ratings operator Yelp agreed to pay $450,000 to settle US charges that it illegally collected data on children, in violation of privacy laws, officials said Wednesday.

A Closer Look: Your (online) life after death

Sep 16, 2014

Sure, you have a lot to do today—laundry, bills, dinner—but it's never too early to start planning for your digital afterlife, the fate of your numerous online accounts once you shed this mortal coil.

Web filter lifts block on gay sites

Sep 16, 2014

A popular online safe-search filter is ending its practice of blocking links to mainstream gay and lesbian advocacy groups for users hoping to avoid obscene sites.

User comments : 0