How the negative trumps the positive in politics

Nov 01, 2012

Negatively framed political attitudes ("I don't like Obama") are stronger than positively framed attitudes ("I like Romney"), and this effect is strengthened when people think more deeply about the issues involved.

That is the finding of a paper published in the latest issue of the by George Bizer, a at Union College in Schenectady, N.Y.

Bizer and his co-authors Iris Žeželj (University of Belgrade) and Jamie Luguri (Yale University) presented participants with information about two fictional (though ostensibly real) candidates – one conservative, one liberal – for a position on a government board.

After reading about the two candidates, some participants were asked if they 'supported' or 'opposed' the liberal candidate and some were asked if they 'supported' or 'opposed' the conservative. When the candidates were vying for a local government board, participants who were led to frame their opinions negatively – regardless of their underlying – expressed more certainty about their attitudes than did participants who were led frame their opinions positively. When the candidates were vying for a distant government board, the effect did not emerge.

Follow-up experiments replicated these findings: Experiment 2 showed that opposers were more certain than supporters, but only when the participants were able to think carefully about the candidates, while Experiment 3 showed that the effect generalized to perceived importance.

Dr Bizer says: "Our prior research showed that framing an opinion in terms of yields stronger attitudes than does framing it in terms of support.

The most interesting point from our latest research is that this effect is actually stronger when people process the messages more deeply – when they are motivated and have been able to think about the issue. But when people are not motivated and able, the effect goes away. So, perhaps counter-intuitively, the people who care the most about the issues or seem more likely to be affected by the bias."

Explore further: Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Exposure to U.S. flag moves voters to the right

Jul 26, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Expect even more flags at Republican campaign events. And if the Democrats were wise, they might well strip the stage of flags altogether, suggests a new Cornell study, the first to look at ...

Recommended for you

Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

Dec 18, 2014

Analysis of the results of a large-scale survey reveals the extent of truancy in English secondary schools and sheds light on the mental health of the country's teens.

Fewer lectures, more group work

Dec 18, 2014

Professor Cees van der Vleuten from Maastricht University is a Visiting Professor at Wits University who believes that learning should be student centred.

How to teach all students to think critically

Dec 18, 2014

All first year students at the University of Technology Sydney could soon be required to take a compulsory maths course in an attempt to give them some numerical thinking skills. ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
not rated yet Nov 01, 2012
It's more efficient to choose in terms of "what's the worst that can happen" instead of comparing a long list of positive promises that probably won't be happening anyways.

It's easier to evaluate and be sure about things you don't like, than things you might like.
kochevnik
not rated yet Nov 01, 2012
This is basic dialectics. Imprison the gouym with polarized ideologies while you propose the only "solution" to solve the dilemma. You can laugh all the way to the bank and you know that ideology is simply a fence for your pet slaves. Jedis change ideologies like they change outfits.
Job001
1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2012
The simple point is most people probably vote against the worst choice.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Nov 02, 2012
Politics is ALL about power and negativity should reign.
That was the lesson of Lord of the Rings. Gandalf said he would be tempted to use the power for good and was wise enough to reject it.

The only positive thing a politician can say is he will cut taxes and decrease the size and scope of the the govt.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.