Nanoparticles: A greater danger to the environment than previously thought

November 15, 2012
Nanoparticles: A greater danger to the environment than previously thought
Daphnia coating. Credit: André Dabrunz

Nanoparticles are more harmful to small animals than tests have indicated to date. This has been shown in a new study of the University of Koblenz-Landau. Thus, the offspring of water fleas (Daphnia magna) exposed to nanoparticles of titanium dioxide react significantly more sensitively than the offspring of parents from a control group. This is the case even though the offspring themselves are not exposed to the nanoparticles. With the usual test methods, no effects attributable to nanoparticles were found. Until now, standard tests do not investigate the effects in the next generation.

According to the dosage of the nanoparticles, the offspring are two to five times more sensitive to these particles than fleas. In concentrations 50 times less than the usual effect threshold in parents, titanium dioxide - previously thought to be toxicologically harmless - already showed considerable effects in the following generation. The lowest dosage to which the parents were exposed was only 20 times greater than the concentration predicted within the scope of other scientific studies for . Comparison with the effect thresholds determined in this new study therefore indicates a risk in the regulatory .

The sensitivity of the test animals was determined on the basis of their swimming behaviour as a function of different titanium dioxide concentrations. The impaired swimming behaviour of the offspring possibly restricts their survival capability, and the could also react more sensitively to other stress factors, such as or metals. By contrast, in the parent generation no effects can be recognised even after longer exposure times. Whether similar and other effects occur with other nanomaterials or organisms is not known at present.

Standard tests not suited

"The study substantiates that , due to their special properties, can induce surprising effects", explains Professor Ralf Schulz of the Landau Department of Environmental Sciences at the University of Koblenz-Landau. "Classical investigations and risk assessments are therefore not sufficient. The regulatory authorities must aim to support the further development and introduction of more suitable tests in order to be able to better assess the long-term risks. Ultimately, nanoparticles are permanently released to the environment."

The toxicity of materials for the aquatic environment is mostly investigated on the basis of standard tests, such as those on water fleas. These organisms play an important role in the food chain of lakes and ponds, are easily bred and react sensitively to harmful substances. Their impact can be quickly and easily determined using the mobility of the water fleas. To this end, there are standardised procedures from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in order to allow the comparison of values. Nevertheless, these are limited to a single generation and do not consider their . "However, these tests do not allow any conclusions in respect of the effects of these materials on humans", adds Dr. Mirco Bundschuh, another of the study's authors.

Numerous industries, such as the electronics, chemical, medical or cosmetic industries, are already utilising nanoparticles on a large scale. For example, sunscreens, deodorants, toothpastes or salad dressings all contain nanoparticles of as a brightening agent. With sunlight the substance can also purify wastewater and air, as well as producing electricity or hydrogen. The properties depend upon the size and structure of the 1 to 100 nanometer tiny particles, which are therefore around a thousand times thinner than a human hair. On the basis of the growth forecasts for the production and use of nanoparticles, one can expect that they will increasingly be released to the environment. Although little is known about their effects on humans and the environment, products with nanoparticles require no special identification.

Explore further: Nanoparticles used in common household items caused genetic damage in mice

More information: Titanium dioxide nanoparticles increase sensitivity in the next generation of the water flea Daphnia magna", Mirco Bundschuh, Frank Seitz, Ricki R. Rosenfeldt, and Ralf Schulz. PLOS ONE,

Related Stories

Nanoparticles cause brain injury in fish

September 19, 2011

Scientists at the University of Plymouth have shown, for the first time in an animal, that nanoparticles have a detrimental effect on the brain and other parts of the central nervous system.

Are silver nanoparticles harmful?

March 14, 2012

Silver nanoparticles cause more damage to testicular cells than titanium dioxide nanoparticles, according to a recent study by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. However, the use of both types may affect testicular ...

Recommended for you

Physicists develop new technique to fathom 'smart' materials

November 26, 2015

Physicists from the FOM Foundation and Leiden University have found a way to better understand the properties of manmade 'smart' materials. Their method reveals how stacked layers in such a material work together to bring ...

Mathematicians identify limits to heat flow at the nanoscale

November 24, 2015

How much heat can two bodies exchange without touching? For over a century, scientists have been able to answer this question for virtually any pair of objects in the macroscopic world, from the rate at which a campfire can ...

New sensor sends electronic signal when estrogen is detected

November 24, 2015

Estrogen is a tiny molecule, but it can have big effects on humans and other animals. Estrogen is one of the main hormones that regulates the female reproductive system - it can be monitored to track human fertility and is ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Nov 15, 2012
"We don't need to protect the environment. The second coming is at hand." - James Watt - Reagan Secretary of the Interior.


Know the Enemy.
not rated yet Nov 15, 2012
Political party: Republican. Why I'm not surprised?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.