Let there be clean light: Kerosene lamps spew black carbon, should be replaced, study says

Nov 28, 2012 by Sarah Yang
Smoke emitted by simple wick lamps, similar to the one shown above, was found to be a significant but previously overlooked source of global black carbon. Credit: Ajay Pillarisetti

(Phys.org)—The primary source of light for more than a billion people in developing nations is also churning out black carbon at levels previously overlooked in greenhouse gas estimates, according to a new study led by researchers at the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois.

Results from field and found that 7 to 9 percent of the in wick lamps—used for light in 250-300 million households without electricity—is converted to black carbon when burned. In comparison, only half of 1 percent of the emissions from burning wood is converted to black carbon.

Factoring in the new study results leads to a twentyfold increase in estimates of black from kerosene-fueled lighting. The previous estimates come from established databases used by the and others. One kilogram of black carbon, a of incomplete combustion and an important , produces as much warming in a month as 700 kilograms of carbon dioxide does over 100 years, the authors said.

"The orange glow in flames comes from black carbon, so the brighter the glow, the more is being made," said study principal investigator Tami Bond, associate professor of civil and environmental engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. "If it's not burned away, it goes into the atmosphere."

The findings, published online this month in the journal & Technology, are coming out at the same time that the United Nations Climate Change Conference kicks off in Doha, Qatar. While officials from around the world are seeking effective policies and guidelines for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, the study authors note that the simple act of replacing could pack a wallop toward that effort.

"There are no magic bullets that will solve all of our greenhouse gas problems, but replacing kerosene lamps is low-hanging fruit, and we don't have many examples of that in the climate world," said study co-author Kirk Smith, professor at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health and director of the Global Health and Environment Program. "There are many inexpensive, cleaner alternatives to kerosene lamps that are available now, and few if any barriers to switching to them."

Smith pointed to lanterns with light-emitting diodes that can be powered by solar cells or even advanced cookstoves that generate electricity from the heat produced. Such technology, said Smith, is already available in developing countries.

The researchers used kerosene lamps purchased in Uganda and Peru and conducted field experiments there to measure the emissions. They repeated the tests in the lab using wicks of varying heights and materials, and kerosene purchased in the United States as well as in Uganda.

The study authors noted that converting to cleaner light sources would not only benefit the planet, it would help improve people's health. A recent epidemiological study in Nepal led by Smith and other researchers at UC Berkeley's School of Public Health, for example, found that women who reported use of kerosene lamps in the home had 9.4 times the rate of tuberculosis compared with those who did not use such lamps.

"Getting rid of kerosene lamps may seem like a small, inconsequential step to take, but when considering the collective impact of hundreds of millions of households, it's a simple move that affects the planet," said study lead author Nicholas Lam, a UC Berkeley graduate student in environmental health sciences.

Explore further: US top court to review power plant emissions rules

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Solar Cells with LEDs Provide Inexpensive Lighting

Nov 09, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Of the 1.5 billion people in developing countries who do not have electricity, many rely on kerosene lamps for light after the sun goes down. But now, researchers from Denmark have designed ...

A bright future with solar lanterns for India's poor

Apr 27, 2009

Solar energy has the potential to improve the living conditions of poor rural households in India as well as contribute to the country's future energy security, according to Professor Govindasamy Agoramoorthy from Tajen University, ...

NOAA takes first broad look at soot from ships

Jul 09, 2008

Tugboats puff out more soot for the amount of fuel used than other commercial vessels, and large cargo ships emit more than twice as much soot as previously estimated, according to the first extensive study of commercial ...

Recommended for you

Conservationists sue over federal coal program

2 hours ago

Conservation groups have sued the government to force federal officials to undertake the first broad environmental review of the government's coal-leasing program in decades.

Owner of ship that damaged reef to pay $840,000

4 hours ago

The federal government and the state of Hawaii have reached an agreement for damages from the owner of a cargo ship that harmed more than 100,000 coral colonies several years ago when it ran aground off Oahu.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
1 / 5 (2) Nov 28, 2012
a practical step forward.
FrankHerbert
not rated yet Nov 28, 2012
So "practical" is code for "doesn't affect me"?
Doug_Huffman
1 / 5 (1) Nov 28, 2012
My diesel powered incandescent Welsbach mantle lamp (by Aladdin) produces light, heat, carbon dioxide and water vapor - only.
ValeriaT
3.7 / 5 (3) Nov 28, 2012
Paradoxically the kerosene lamp is energetically least efficient source of light at all ($3.80 per klxh with compare to $0.05 per klxh for LED). The poor countries which are using them are getting poorer automatically.
unknownorgin
1 / 5 (1) Dec 14, 2012
This is more pseudo science, There is no way that soot is a gas any more than sand or dust is and to call it a "Greenhouse gas" is a bold lie to fool the uneducated. The poor in these areas are not going buy this hi tech stuff and the only practical way to get these countys to start using solar cells, LED ect is to help them develop the technology to manufactor it. This makes new found wealth and jobs as well as developing infrastructure so they have electricity and running water. How about helping the poor instead trying to force them to use technology they have no hope of repairing or making on thier own.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.