Homework doesn't mean better grades, but maybe better standardized test scores, study finds

Nov 21, 2012
Robert H. Tai, associate professor of science education at U.Va.'s Curry School of Education Credit: Jane Haley

(Phys.org)—The time students spend on math and science homework doesn't necessarily mean better grades, but it could lead to better performance on standardized tests, a new study finds.

"When Is Homework Worth The Time?" was recently published by lead investigator Adam Maltese, assistant professor of at Indiana University, and co-authors Robert H. Tai, associate professor of science education at the University of Virginia's Curry School of Education, and Xitao Fan, dean of education at the University of Macau. Maltese is a Curry alumnus, and Fan is a former Curry faculty member.

The authors examined survey and transcript data of more than 18,000 10th-grade to uncover explanations for . The data focused on individual classes, examining student outcomes through the transcripts from two nationwide samples collected in 1990 and 2002 by the National Center for Education Statistics.

Contrary to much published research, a of time spent on homework and the final class grade found no substantive difference in grades between students who complete homework and those who do not. But the analysis found a positive association between student performance on and the time they spent on homework.

"Our results hint that maybe homework is not being used as well as it could be," Maltese said.

Tai said that homework assignments cannot replace good teaching.

"I believe that this finding is the end result of a chain of unfortunate educational decisions, beginning with the content coverage requirements that push too much information into too little time to learn it in the classroom," Tai said. "The overflow typically results in more homework assignments. However, students spending more time on something that is not easy to understand or needs to be explained by a teacher does not help these students learn and, in fact, may confuse them.

"The results from this study imply that homework should be purposeful," he added, "and that the purpose must be understood by both the teacher and the students."

The authors suggest that factors such as class participation and attendance may mitigate the association of homework to stronger grade performance. They also indicate the types of homework assignments typically given may work better toward standardized test preparation than for retaining knowledge of class material.

Maltese said the genesis for the study was a concern about whether a traditional and ubiquitous educational practice, such as homework, is associated with students achieving at a higher level in math and science. Many media reports about education compare U.S. students unfavorably to high-achieving math and science students from across the world. The 2007 documentary film "Two Million Minutes" compared two Indiana students to students in India and China, taking particular note of how much more time the Indian and Chinese students spent on studying or completing homework.

"We're not trying to say that all homework is bad," Maltese said. "It's expected that students are going to do homework. This is more of an argument that it should be quality over quantity. So in math, rather than doing the same types of problems over and over again, maybe it should involve having students analyze new types of problems or data. In science, maybe the students should write concept summaries instead of just reading a chapter and answering the questions at the end."

This issue is particularly relevant given that the time spent on homework reported by most students translates into the equivalent of 100 to 180 50-minute class periods of extra learning time each year.

The authors conclude that given current policy initiatives to improve science, technology, engineering and math, or STEM, education, more evaluation is needed about how to use homework time more effectively. They suggest more research be done on the form and function of homework assignments.

"In today's current educational environment, with all the activities taking up children's time both in school and out of school, the purpose of each homework assignment must be clear and targeted," Tai said. "With , more is not better."

Explore further: No silver bullet: Study identifies risk factors of youth charged with murder

Related Stories

Piling on the homework -- Does it work for everyone?

Aug 18, 2008

While U.S students continue to lag behind many countries academically, national statistics show that teachers have responded by assigning more homework. But according to a joint study by researchers at Binghamton University ...

Recommended for you

Data indicate there is no immigration crisis

13 hours ago

Is there an "immigration crisis" on the U.S.-Mexico border? Not according to an examination of historical immigration data, according to a new paper from Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy.

Combating bullying in New Zealand

16 hours ago

Victoria University of Wellington's Accent Learning is rolling out a new bullying prevention programme for schools—a first for the Southern Hemisphere.

Why has Halloween infiltrated Australian culture?

18 hours ago

Halloween appears to have infiltrated Australian culture, and according to a University of Adelaide researcher, the reason for its increasing popularity could run much deeper than Americanisation.

The hidden world of labor trafficking

19 hours ago

When it comes to human trafficking, we often hear about victims being kidnapped or violently taken from their homes. But what about people who are forced into labor in the U.S.?

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

julianpenrod
1 / 5 (2) Nov 21, 2012
This may cause this not to be printed, but this article comes across as playing the propaganda that "educational system" swindlers promote to keep the guillible from realizing they're being sold trash. Like the swindlers, the article touts the phrase "standarized tests". That has become almost a curse word in "education", certainly, it's something the swindlers despise. Their scams, from Montessori to "whole language" to "self esteem" to LATIC, all fail to prepare students for what they can be helped by knowing, so the swindlers downplay standardized tests. But, then, what is wrong with knowing standardized things like 6 X 9, or what a sentence clause is, or what constitutes a mammal, or who wrote "Huckleberry Finn", or who painted the Sistine Chapel, or who the first president of the U.S. was? And, face it, regular scheduled tests are standardized tests! How can someone do well there, which is what getting good grades means, and yet fail standardized tests?