Flexible learning system allows humans to keep up with linguistic change, researchers find

Nov 06, 2012 by Susan Kelley

(Phys.org)—Unlike other species, humans speak to each other in remarkably diverse ways. Some of our 6,000 to 8,000 languages use clicks (!Kung). Others don't differentiate between nouns and verbs (Straits Salish). Still others pack a whole sentence into a single word (Cayuga). In comparison, the communication systems of other animals show precious little variation within species; vervet monkeys use the same communicative signals across their geographical range, just as honeybees, bacteria and every other species each have one way of communicating.

So how have humans developed so many when other species have not?

A Cornell researcher and his colleagues now say they know why. The diversity of is made possible because we have evolved a flexible learning system to keep up with the rapid linguistic change associated with human migrations, according to a new study published Oct. 30 in the journal .

"Only biological adaptations for flexible learning combined with cultural evolution can explain the astonishing while still allowing each child to learn any human language," said co-author Morten Christiansen, professor of psychology and co-director of the Cornell Cognitive Science Program.

To reach their conclusions, the researchers created a computer model to explore the effects of on . As humans spread across the globe, the languages of geographically separated groups quickly ended up becoming different from one another through processes of cultural evolution. The model indicates that humans have evolved a flexible learning system to follow such rapid linguistic change.

"Importantly, the model assigns a crucial role to linguistic change, which has been extraordinarily rapid during historical times. For example, the entire Indo-European language group diverged from a common source in less than 10,000 years—the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms," Christiansen said.

The researchers speculate that the cultural evolution of language may have "recruited" preexisting brain systems to facilitate its use, just as reading relies on neural substrates that predate the invention of writing.

The findings have important implications for understanding the origin of language and human cognition: Humans have evolved a flexible learning system for keeping up with the rapid cultural evolution of language, instead of a special-purpose linguistic system analogous to the visual system. Likewise, variation in social and religious practices may similarly be seen as products of such flexible learning, rather than evolved wiring for moral behavior.

Explore further: Personalized advertising attracts more attention, makes the contents of ads easier to remember

More information: Christiansen, M. et al. The Biological Origins of Linguistic Diversity. PLoS ONE, Oct. 30, 2012.

Related Stories

The 'bumpy ride' of linguistic change

Jun 21, 2010

A recent study of an ancient language provides new insights into the nature of linguistic evolution, with potential applications for today's world. The study, "Dvandvas, Blocking, and the Associative: The Bumpy Ride from ...

Language driven by culture, not biology

Jan 20, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Language in humans has evolved culturally rather than genetically, according to a study by UCL (University College London) and US researchers. By modelling the ways in which genes for language might have ...

Historical context guides language development

Apr 14, 2011

Not only do we humans enjoy talking -- and talking a lot -- we also do so in very different ways: about 6,000 languages are spoken today worldwide. How this wealth of expression developed, however, largely remains a mystery. ...

Language use is simpler than previously thought

Sep 21, 2012

(Phys.org)—For more than 50 years, language scientists have assumed that sentence structure is fundamentally hierarchical, made up of small parts in turn made of smaller parts, like Russian nesting dolls.

Indo-European languages originate in Anatolia

Aug 28, 2012

(Phys.org)—The Indo-European languages belong to one of the widest spread language families of the world. For the last two millenia, many of these languages have been written, and their history is relatively ...

Recommended for you

Why are UK teenagers skipping school?

Dec 18, 2014

Analysis of the results of a large-scale survey reveals the extent of truancy in English secondary schools and sheds light on the mental health of the country's teens.

Fewer lectures, more group work

Dec 18, 2014

Professor Cees van der Vleuten from Maastricht University is a Visiting Professor at Wits University who believes that learning should be student centred.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Tausch
1 / 5 (1) Nov 06, 2012
Hearing and Speaking are biological adaptations to planets with atmospheres.
Atmospheres provide mechanical waves (sound).
Sound provides diversity.
The limits to the diversity of sound are the limits to the resolutions of the senses evolved to manipulate mechanical waves.

So, I leave you with the thought exercise of the day:

As far as, and in the case, where humans are concerned, evolution led to sound production (speech) and sound processing (hearing.)

What prevented humans from utilizing light production (flashlights are cheating) along side light processing (sight?)
Tausch
1 / 5 (1) Nov 06, 2012
Congratulations go to the researchers and research. Kudos.
Donutz
not rated yet Nov 06, 2012
This sounds a little like putting the cart before the horse. Wouldn't the evolution of the ability to handle language in software have had to evolved BEFORE we left Africa? It seems to me that whatever happened to differentiate humans created both our language capabilities and our intelligence levels at the "same time". This in turn helped us to migrate out of Africa and adapt to many different environments.
Tausch
3 / 5 (2) Nov 06, 2012
Wouldn't the evolution of the ability to handle language in software have had to evolved BEFORE we left Africa? - Dz


The article supports your statement/assertion above with:

The researchers speculate that the cultural evolution of language may have "recruited" preexisting brain systems to facilitate its use, just as reading relies on neural substrates that predate the invention of writing.


'Language capabilities' must preexist.
Sensory 'input' stimulates 'intelligence'.

The answer to your question is yes. The article agrees.
The 'timing' and 'maturity' of language capabilities and intelligence is irrelevant to migration as long as any those aspects take place before migration.

Although migration is possible without language capabilities and intelligence (viruses) the possibility of that becomes unlikelier the higher you climb the tree of life forms.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.