Comet collisions every six seconds explain 17-year-old stellar mystery

Nov 08, 2012 by Stuart Wolpert

(Phys.org)—Every six seconds, for millions of years, comets have been colliding with one another near a star in the constellation Cetus called 49 CETI, which is visible to the naked eye.

Over the past three decades, astronomers have discovered hundreds of around stars, but only two—49 CETI is one—have been found that also have large amounts of gas orbiting them.

, about a million years old, have a disk of both dust and gas orbiting them, but the gas tends to dissipate within a few million years and almost always within about 10 million years. Yet 49 CETI, which is thought to be considerably older, is still being orbited by a tremendous quantity of gas in the form of molecules, long after that gas should have dissipated.

"We now believe that 49 CETI is 40 million years old, and the mystery is how in the world can there be this much gas around an otherwise ordinary star that is this old," said Benjamin Zuckerman, a UCLA professor of physics and astronomy and co-author of the research, which was recently published in the . "This is the oldest star we know of with so much gas."

Zuckerman and his co-author Inseok Song, a University of Georgia assistant professor of physics and astronomy, propose that the mysterious gas comes from a very massive disk-shaped region around 49 CETI that is similar to the sun's , which lies beyond the of Neptune.

The total mass of the various objects that make up the Kuiper Belt, including the dwarf planet Pluto, is about one-tenth the mass of the Earth. But back when the Earth was forming, astronomers say, the Kuiper Belt likely had a mass that was approximately 40 times larger than the Earth's; most of that initial mass has been lost in the last 4.5 billion years.

By contrast, the Kuiper Belt analogue that orbits around 49 CETI now has a mass of about 400 Earth masses—4,000 times the current mass of the Kuiper Belt.

"Hundreds of trillions of comets orbit around 49 CETI and one other star whose age is about 30 million years. Imagine so many trillions of comets, each the size of the UCLA campus—approximately 1 mile in diameter—orbiting around 49 CETI and bashing into one another," Zuckerman said. "These young comets likely contain more carbon monoxide than typical comets in our solar system. When they collide, the carbon monoxide escapes as a gas. The gas seen around these two stars is the result of the incredible number of collisions among these comets.

"We calculate that comets collide around these two stars about every six seconds," he said. "I was absolutely amazed when we calculated this rapid rate. I would not have dreamt it in a million years. We think these collisions have been occurring for 10 million years or so."

Using a radio telescope in the Sierra Nevada mountains of southern Spain in 1995, Zuckerman and two colleagues discovered the gas that orbits 49 CETI, but the origin of the had remained unexplained for 17 years, until now.

Explore further: Young binary star system may form planets with weird and wild orbits

Related Stories

Spitzer detects comet storm in nearby solar system

Oct 20, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has detected signs of icy bodies raining down in an alien solar system. The downpour resembles our own solar system several billion years ago during a period ...

The Edges of the Solar System

May 07, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The solar system does not end abruptly past the planets. Beyond the orbit of Neptune, the outermost planet (it orbits the sun at a distance of 30 AU, where one AU is the average distance of ...

Recommended for you

Evidence of a local hot bubble carved by a supernova

18 hours ago

I spent this past weekend backpacking in Rocky Mountain National Park, where although the snow-swept peaks and the dangerously close wildlife were staggering, the night sky stood in triumph. Without a fire, ...

Astronomers measure weight of galaxies, expansion of universe

Jul 30, 2014

Astronomers at the University of British Columbia have collaborated with international researchers to calculate the precise mass of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies, dispelling the notion that the two galaxies have similar ...

Mysterious molecules in space

Jul 29, 2014

Over the vast, empty reaches of interstellar space, countless small molecules tumble quietly though the cold vacuum. Forged in the fusion furnaces of ancient stars and ejected into space when those stars ...

Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Jul 28, 2014

What an awesome photo! Italian amateur astronomer Rolando Ligustri nailed it earlier today using a remote telescope in New Mexico and wide-field 4-inch (106 mm) refractor. Currently the brightest comet in ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

KeithMcC
1 / 5 (1) Nov 08, 2012
"I was absolutely amazed when we calculated this rapid rate. I would not have dreamt it in a million years. ..."

Is the surprisingly high rate an example of the "birthday paradox"?
eachus
not rated yet Nov 08, 2012
"I was absolutely amazed when we calculated this rapid rate. I would not have dreamt it in a million years. ..."

Is the surprisingly high rate an example of the "birthday paradox"?


If it is, we should have collisions in the Kuiper belt here every 6 sec times 4000 squared = roughly 3 years. That number should include collisions of comets in the inner solar system, but not collisions with planets.

Can we account for the difference by saying that Kuiper belt objects clumped up so that we have fewer, but larger objects now? Probably.
axemaster
not rated yet Nov 09, 2012
Either that or the radius of our Kuiper Belt might be greater, thus decreasing the number density of the comets.
nkalanaga
not rated yet Nov 09, 2012
Or the ones that are left are the ones with non-colliding orbits. After all, they've had another 4 billion years to weed out intersecting orbits.
Urgelt
not rated yet Nov 12, 2012
eachus, clumping is only one of the uncontrolled variables in your square function. For your comparative square function to be meaningful, you have to assume an awfully thin Kuiper disc, which isn't at all proven and is probably unlikely. You also have to assume equivalent volumes for the respective belts, also a risky assumption.