Researcher: The clocks are ticking and the climate is changing

Nov 16, 2012
Professor C. Robertson (Rob) McClung studies the genetic and biochemical mechanisms underlying internal biological clocks in plants. Credit: Eli Burakian, Dartmouth College

Dartmouth plant biologist C. Robertson (Rob) McClung is not your typical clock-watcher. His clocks are internal, biological, and operate in circadian rhythms—cycles based on a 24-hour period. Living organisms depend upon these clocks to keep pace with the Earth's daily rotation and the recurring changes it imposes on the environment. These clocks allow the plant or animal to anticipate the changes and adapt to them by modifying its biology, behavior, and biochemistry.

"If you know that the sun is going to go down, and if you are a photosynthetic plant, you have to readjust your metabolism in order to make it through the night," says McClung.

Seeking Knowledge Among the Weeds

McClung, the Patricia F. and William B. Hale 1944 Professor in the Arts and Sciences, uses the Arabidopsis plant in his research on the mechanisms that affect plant behavior and its genetics. He jokingly refers to it as "an inconsequential little weed," but holds it in high esteem as an bed.

According to the National Institutes of Health, this member of the mustard family is the for studies of the cellular and molecular biology of . "Because plants are closely related, it is quite likely that knowledge derived from Arabidopsis studies can be readily transferred to agronomically important species," says McClung.

Water and the Changing Climate

McClung sees as increasingly important in the face of , and to in particular. "In the context of climate change and the need to exploit increasingly marginal habitats, fuller understanding of mechanisms may offer strategies to improve ," says McClung. "We need to know how an organism measures time and how it uses that information to coordinate its physiology and behavior."

Water is the landscape on which biological clocks and climate change intersect. Agriculture consumes the vast majority of our water, and warmer and dryer conditions are predicted for much of the agricultural land of the United States. This is based on our current understanding of the changes predicted to be associated with global warming and in this scenario our aquatic resources will become increasingly scarce.

Water is lost during the gas exchange that takes place in photosynthesis—carbon dioxide in, oxygen out—through small pores in the surface of leaves that periodically open and close under the control of a biological clock. Exercising control over this clock could be a means of conserving water. "We know that these little cells on the surface of the leaf are controlled by the clock," says McClung. "It could be that different clocks regulate it slightly differently, and we would like to find the best clock, fine-tune it, and perhaps optimize the ability to get CO2 in without losing water."

Water figures prominently in another aspect of plant physiology. Water moves up through the stem to the leaves, involving proteins called aquaporins. "There is a big family of genes that encode aquaporins, and in Arabidopsis the circadian clock governs the expression cycles of about a third of those genes," says McClung. "That suggests there is mechanism to actually regulate this hydraulic conductivity over time, constituting another instance where the clock is involved in water use efficiency."

New Frontiers

Together with colleagues in Wyoming, Wisconsin, and Missouri, McClung has been looking at another a crop, Brassica rapa, a close relative of which is the source of canola oil. With a five-year National Science Foundation grant of more than $5 million, the group is investigating Brassica's circadian patterns, looking at inheritance and water use efficiency. "We have mapped 10 genetic regions that are associated with water use efficiency," says McClung. "We have also traced circadian parameters to most of those same areas, suggesting a link between the two. This association suggests that we could potentially use the clock to manipulate water use efficiency."

In a related project, McClung will be working with soybeans, attempting to correlate circadian period length with latitude. "If we can understand the clock, we might then manipulate the clock in ways to achieve desired goals, including water use efficiency and better yield."

Why and How?

McClung feels strongly that this sort of basic research has the potential to contribute in significant ways to food production increases. "Whether or not we achieve that increase or whether it allows us to fertilize a little less and so pollute a little less but maintain the same productivity level, anything in the net direction that is positive is going to help," he says. "We can't necessarily say exactly how it will help, but I think it's not unreasonable to think that this very basic research can have a real world impact, and one hopes it will."

Explore further: Mycologist promotes agarikon as a possibility to counter growing antibiotic resistance

More information: Sidebar: Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)

"We will need to genetically modify our plants to control our circadian biological clocks," says Professor Rob McClung. "Every domesticated plant and animal that we have today is already genetically modified. None of them are as they are found in nature. We have manipulated their genes by selective breeding and creating hybrids."

To produce the corn we eat today, prehistoric farmers first had to find some variant that had a desirable trait, keep its seeds and plant them, repeating the process for countless generations to bring out that trait. That is selective breeding and it produced a plant whose genome was modified.

To make a tomato plant resistance to a particular disease or pest, we might find some related pest-resistant species in the wild and cross it with our garden variety tomato to produce a hybrid. Successive crosses would preserve the "tomato-ness" while selectively retaining that little bit from the wild relative that resists tomato-eating bugs.

"Along with introducing the gene or set of genes encoding resistance, we may have also brought in a whole bunch of other ill-defined genes on either side," McClung says. "We don't know the extent of it. We don't know what else is in there. While some regard this as a 'natural' approach, the unknown genetic fellow travelers could be problematic or even dangerous."

For more than 20 years, we have possessed the technology to precisely insert a single gene, making one change and only one change, producing what is known as recombinant DNA. "We are modifying genes in a much more informed way and precise way, targeting specific genes and manipulating those," he says.

"Nevertheless, there is vocal opposition to this practice, in spite of the fact that we have been doing it for decades and there is yet to be a single example of anything bad happening from that," says McClung. "It is a philosophical standpoint based on a lack of understanding. People don't understand the science and they come up with a lot of arguments against it."

The dilemma rests on timing. Conventional breeding, though imprecise and unpredictable, is a workable but lengthy process. Recombinant DNA is fast. In a world beset by overpopulation, famine and global climate change, McClung questions whether we can really afford the time to wait.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Molecular basis and regulation of circadian rhythms in plants

Jul 01, 2008

Dr. C. Robertson McClung and his colleagues are investigating the genetic basis and molecular mechanisms of circadian cycling and regulation in plants. Dr. McClung, of the Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, ...

Circadian clock controls plant growth hormone

Aug 13, 2007

The plant growth hormone auxin is controlled by circadian rhythms within the plant, UC Davis researchers have found. The discovery explains how plants can time their growth to take advantage of resources such ...

Clock-work plants

Jul 22, 2005

Researchers at the University of Cambridge found that the biological clock in plants increases photosynthesis, helping them grow faster. The biological clock, which allows individual plant cells to estimate the time of day, ...

Immune defense revs for morning attack

Feb 10, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Timing is everything in the long-standing arms race between the flowering plant Arabidopsis and its pathogen, Hyaloperonospora, a downy mildew.

Recommended for you

YEATS protein potential therapeutic target for cancer

Oct 23, 2014

Federal Express and UPS are no match for the human body when it comes to distribution. There exists in cancer biology an impressive packaging and delivery system that influences whether your body will develop cancer or not.

Precise and programmable biological circuits

Oct 23, 2014

A team led by ETH professor Yaakov Benenson has developed several new components for biological circuits. These components are key building blocks for constructing precisely functioning and programmable bio-computers.

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

RazorsEdge
3.4 / 5 (10) Nov 16, 2012
Increasing water efficiency is useful whether or not the climate is changing. A nod to climate change must have been a grant requirement.
djr
2.1 / 5 (7) Nov 16, 2012
"A nod to climate change must have been a grant requirement"

Or maybe some scientists believe global warming is happening - is potentially a problem - and more drought tollerant plants could be a good thing. Are you interested in data Razor?

http://www.ncdc.n...-3-6.gif
ryggesogn2
3.1 / 5 (17) Nov 16, 2012
When has climate stopped changing?
Bob_Kob
2 / 5 (8) Nov 17, 2012
Didn't they say that climate change would take many decades to show any effect - and yet now all of a sudden were experiencing global warming at full force - little than 10 years since it came into the public's attention.
Noumenon
2.6 / 5 (15) Nov 17, 2012
"A nod to climate change must have been a grant requirement"

Or maybe some scientists believe global warming is happening - is potentially a problem - and more drought tollerant plants could be a good thing. Are you interested in data Razor?

http://www.ncdc.n...-3-6.gif


Are you? Look at the scale of that graph, 0.80°C over 150 years! It is such a small amount that one could concluded the opposite of what is being propagandized, that the global climate is remarkably stable.

Zooming in to the previous 16 years shows a leveling of the trend,... but this only demonstrates that the less data one uses the more one can tilt the trend,. which is also true for the previous 150 years as well in comparison to the previous thousands of years.

Now, I can't imagine that putting up increased ppm co2 into the atmosphere wouldn't cause some effect,... I just don't buy that we have a handle on it as proclaimed, to the tenths of a degree per decade.
Noumenon
2.7 / 5 (14) Nov 17, 2012
I have no problem doing things to lessen reliance on dirty oil, and investing in cleaner alternatives,.. I just reject anti-capitalist, social engineering, and other "hysterical" policies that would affect the economy, over what amounts to speculation.

And Obama seems to agree with me,... in a speech after being reelected,....

""I think the American people right now have been so focused and will continue to be focused on our economy, jobs and growth that if the message is somehow that we're going to ignore jobs and growth simply to address climate change, I don't think anybody's going to go for that. I won't go for that," - B.H. Obama

But, but, i thought the green industry would "create" jobs mr. president? I confused now. Hehe
ScooterG
3 / 5 (16) Nov 17, 2012
Increasing water efficiency is useful whether or not the climate is changing. A nod to climate change must have been a grant requirement.


My thinking exactly, except you were more tactful than I could have ever been. I would have called him a "plant biologist-turned-AGW research whore".
JoeBlue
1.3 / 5 (6) Nov 17, 2012
I honestly think that people pushing the idea that GMO = selective breeding is rather dangerous. There is a huge difference between splicing genes from one species to another and just breeding the traits you would prefer.