Strengthening Canada's research capacity: The gender dimension

Nov 21, 2012

An in-depth, authoritative assessment of women in university research has found that although there has been significant progress in the representation of women in the university research ranks, there are still gender equity challenges that must be overcome and the passage of time will not be enough to ensure parity.

A newly released report by the Council of Canadian Academies entitled, Strengthening Canada's Research Capacity: The Gender Dimension provides an assessment of the the factors that influence university research careers of . This assessment was requested by the Minister of Industry in the fall of 2010 after the notable absence of female candidates for the prestigious Canada Excellence Research Chairs program.

In response, the Council convened an of 15 Canadian and international experts from diverse fields who met over the course of approximately 18-months. The Panel was chaired by Dr. Lorna R. Marsden, President emeritus and Professor, York University, in Toronto. The Panel focussed on women in university research, and to conduct their assessment they used a life course model that allowed for an examination of the critical factors that impact career paths from the early years, through to post-secondary education and at different .

"There is no single solution to remedy the underrepresentation of women in the highest ranks of academic research careers. The issue itself is a multifaceted one that is affected by social, cultural, economic, institutional, and political factors and contexts", commented Panel Chair Dr. Lorna R. Marsden. "There has been significant progress in the representation of women in the academy since the 1970s, and there is much to be celebrated. However, as evidenced by the wide variation in women's representation by discipline and rank, there are still challenges to overcome."

The Expert Panel developed a baseline of information regarding the statistical profile of women researchers in Canada. The major findings from the statistical profile are:

  • In general, the Canadian profile is similar to that of other economically advanced nations.
  • Women's progress in Canadian universities is uneven and dependent on discipline and rank.
  • The higher the rank, the lower the percentage of women in comparison to men.
The Panel also identified key factors that affect the multiple career paths of women. These factors start early in life with stereotypes that define roles and expectations, followed by a lack of knowledge about requisites for potential career paths, and a lack of role models and mentors. These issues, combined with a rigid tenure track structure, challenges associated with the paid work-family life balance, and the importance of increased support and coordination amongst governments and institutions need to be examined if Canada is going to achieve a greater gender balance within academia.

Elizabeth Dowdeswell, President of the Council of Canadian Academies noted, "Although the Panel was constrained by a lack of data in some areas, they were able to identify critical factors that affect the career paths of women in university research. With this information now in-hand an informed Canadian conversation can take place regarding the persistent challenges that are preventing women in research from maximizing their presence and potential across all disciplines and ranks."

Explore further: Power can corrupt even the honest

Provided by Council of Canadian Academies

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Many top US scientists wish they had more children

Aug 08, 2011

Nearly half of all women scientists and one-quarter of male scientists at the nation's top research universities said their career has kept them from having as many children as they had wanted, according to a new study by ...

Recommended for you

Power can corrupt even the honest

5 hours ago

When appointing a new leader, selectors base their choice on several factors and typically look for leaders with desirable characteristics such as honesty and trustworthiness. However once leaders are in power, can we trust ...

Learning at 10 degrees north

5 hours ago

Secluded beaches, calypso music and the entertaining carnival are often what come to mind when thinking of the islands of Trinidad and Tobago. But Dal Earth Sciences students might first consider Trinidad's ...

How to find the knowns and unknowns in any research

7 hours ago

Have you ever felt overloaded by information? Ever wondered how to make sense of claims and counter-claims about a topic? With so much information out there on many different issues, how is a person new to ...

Minorities energize US consumer market, according to report

7 hours ago

The buying power of minority groups in the U.S. has reached new heights and continues to outpace cumulative inflation, according to the latest Multicultural Economy Report from the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rockwolf1000
1 / 5 (1) Nov 22, 2012
What a load of crap! I've said it before and I'll say it again; Women are also under-represented in other fields such as sewer maintenance and garbage collection yet I never hear any feminists getting their panties in a knot over that. Men are under-represented in nursing. Why is no one concerned about that. What makes people think there should be a 50/50 split of gender in any field? Men and women typically have different interests in general, and Canada has more than enough laws and regulations concerning discrimination in the workplace. Disgusting!
ValeriaT
1 / 5 (1) Nov 22, 2012
Women are also under-represented in other fields such as sewer maintenance and garbage collection
This is not so problematic, because it's generally accepted, that the women are of weaker constitution and more susceptible to health defect from environmental pollution than men. But the women are under-represented even in programming and construction of electronic devices, which means, they're weaker even mentally in solving of task, which do require higher level of concentration and creativity.

Why the feminists, who are calling for higher application of women in intellectually rewarding disciplines like the science don't call for higher representation of women between programmers, web and electronic designers? Because such jobs aren't very lucrative socially and the mental handicap of women would become immediately apparent there. Women aren't interested about technical disciplines from good reason: they do feel instinctively, they're not bright enough for it.
ValeriaT
1 / 5 (1) Nov 22, 2012
For example, if we realize, that 99% of Youtube videos dealing with chemistry, physics, electronics or programming are uploaded and narrated with guys, that 99% of webs and scientific blogs with Java applets and various simulations are maintained with men - then even 30% representation of women in science is rather artificial product of liberal gender politics, than the natural result of spontaneous interest of women about technical disciplines. It has no meaning to cover the apparent facts: when given an opportunity, most of girls simply fuck these disciplines heartily and they're interested rather about pets, arts, journalism and social sciences. Because the contemporary society tends to specialization (due the competition at job market only people who really love their job can become successful in it), this gender bias is rather deepening, than releasing in recent years - despite many liberal tendencies.