Apple suit vs. Google over patent rates dismissed

Nov 05, 2012 by Peter Svensson
A federal judge on Monday tossed out an Apple lawsuit accusing Google-owned Motorola Mobility of trying to charge the iPhone maker too much for licenses to essential technology for mobile devices.

A federal judge in Madison, Wisconsin, on Monday threw out a suit by Apple Inc. claiming that Google subsidiary Motorola Mobility is seeking unreasonably high license fees for the use of patents on wireless technology.

The suit is part of a world-spanning battle between Apple and Google, whose Android software powers the smartphones that compete with Apple's iPhone. Google bought Motorola Mobility, a once pioneering maker of cellphones, this summer to gain control of its patents and gain leverage against Apple in its court battles.

Motorola has been seeking a license fee of 2.25 percent of the price of Apple devices that incorporate Wi-Fi or cellular technologies, including the iPhone and iPod Touch. Motorola holds patents that are essential to making the devices work. In the suit filed last year, Apple said the fee was too high.

Motorola is obliged by standards-setting bodies to offer licenses at "reasonable" rates when the patents are part of industry standards like Wi-Fi and cellular technology. There are, however, various answers as to what constitutes a "reasonable" rate.

Bloomberg News has reported that the Federal Trade Commission is close to suing Google because it uses standards-essential patents in suits aimed at blocking Apple products from the market.

Judge Barbara Crabb at the district court for the Western District of Wisconsin did not give a reason for dismissing the suit.

Motorola spokeswoman Jennifer Weyrauch-Erickson said the company was pleased at the judge's action.

"We remain interested in reaching an agreement with Apple," she said.

Apple representatives declined to comment.

Explore further: Apple co-founder to mentor at Australian university

4.8 /5 (11 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Turner channels removed from Dish amid pact spat

16 hours ago

Channels such as Cartoon Network and CNN are no longer part of Dish's programming lineup as a deadline has passed for the satellite TV provider and Turner Broadcasting to renew their distribution agreement.

Verizon reports higher 3Q net income, revenue

17 hours ago

Verizon Communications Inc. on Tuesday reported higher net income and revenue in its third quarter, helped by strong wireless subscriber growth and demand for its high-speed FiOS Internet services.

Amazon, Simon & Schuster sign book retail deal

Oct 21, 2014

Amazon has reached a deal with American book publisher Simon & Schuster, the companies said, though the e-commerce giant remains at loggerheads with France's Hachette over e-book pricing.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jayman
4 / 5 (4) Nov 05, 2012
Apple is the original patent troll and now that the shoe is on the other foot, they are yelling 'blue murder'. Rub it in, Moto !! Jack it up to 5 percent. After all, this is the company that wanted to enforce "swipe to unlock".
VendicarD
5 / 5 (2) Nov 06, 2012
Apple told the judge that it would not abide by the court ruling unless it ruled in their favor.

That is why the court dismissed the case with prejudice against Apple.

Apple clearly believes that it has the right to ignore the law.

Filth.

El_Nose
not rated yet Nov 06, 2012
so Moto wants to charge Apple 11.25 per iPad for wifi -- considering the news that it costs about 360 to make the device and they charge 500 - 800