Physics prize up next on Nobel schedule

October 9, 2012

A secretive award committee in Stockholm is about to announce the winner of this year's Nobel Prize in physics.

Only two women have won the prize since it was first awarded in 1901: Marie Curie in 1903 and Maria Goeppert-Mayer in 1963. The other 189 winners were men.

The physics panel also has a tendency to reward younger people than the other Nobel Prize committees. The average age for physics laureates is 54, the lowest for any of the six . Nobel literature laureates are on average 10 years older.

The 2012 Nobel Prize announcements got under way Monday with the medicine prize going to stem cell pioneers John Gurdon of Britain and Japan's Shinya Yamanaka. Each award is worth 8 million kronor, or about $1.2 million.

Explore further: Smoot donates Nobel prize money to charity

0 shares

Related Stories

Nobel winners pay tribute to deceased laureate

December 6, 2011

(AP) -- Two scientists who will collect this year's Nobel Prize in medicine praised late co-winner Ralph Steinman on Tuesday, saying he probably knew he was in line for the prestigious award.

Recommended for you

Robotic insect mimics nature's extreme moves

July 30, 2015

The concept of walking on water might sound supernatural, but in fact it is a quite natural phenomenon. Many small living creatures leverage water's surface tension to maneuver themselves around. One of the most complex maneuvers, ...

The sound of music, according to physicists

July 30, 2015

Joshua Bodon is sick of hearing "Somewhere Over the Rainbow." More specifically, he's sick of hearing one 25-second clip of the song repeated more than 550 times.

New blow for 'supersymmetry' physics theory

July 27, 2015

In a new blow for the futuristic "supersymmetry" theory of the universe's basic anatomy, experts reported fresh evidence Monday of subatomic activity consistent with the mainstream Standard Model of particle physics.

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

sirchick
1 / 5 (1) Oct 10, 2012
The awards go to those that earned it .... so to say it "to reward the younger people" is wrong.. it seems simply the "young" have been doing what ever they did to earn the prize.

If the committee chose people that do not deserve it to "balance" this male : female, and young : old statistic which is not important or a reflection of society, then the award becomes not worth while at all.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.