Huawei row shines light on East-West culture clash

Oct 21, 2012 by Kelly Olsen
US security fears over two China telecom firms have spotlighted Western suspicions Chinese companies are state-influenced, a culture clash analysts say could loom larger as the country's businesses look overseas.

US security fears over two China telecom firms have spotlighted Western suspicions Chinese companies are state-influenced, a culture clash analysts say could loom larger as the country's businesses look overseas.

firms Huawei Technologies and ZTE were put on the defensive this month by a US Congressional committee that labelled them potential national security threats that should be excluded from and barred from acquisitions in the .

Huawei—a private company founded by a People's Liberation Army veteran—and ZTE—publicly traded and less than 16 percent state invested, according to the corporation—have denied they pose any such .

But countless Chinese companies remain either majority state-owned or maintain intricate government links, a fact noted even by ZTE itself.

ZTE spokesman David Dai Shu said in a statement that the committee's finding that the company may not be free of state influence, "would apply to any company operating in China".

Analysts said the issue could become a recurring stumbling block as more Chinese firms look for expansion opportunities abroad—especially in sensitive sectors—just as China is increasingly viewed as a strategic US rival.

"We've never had a country with a one-party state and a very large state sector that has played such an important role in the , that has been in a position to make investments around the world," said Patrick Chovanec, professor at Tsinghua University's School of Economics and Management in Beijing.

Worries over Chinese companies buying into US industries considered strategic have scuttled past deals, as in 2005 when state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp (CNOOC) tried to take over US oil major Unocal.

More recently, President last month blocked a Chinese-led group from purchasing several near a US naval station, saying the acquisition threatened national security.

"Such decisions by the United States will affect the enthusiasm of Chinese companies to invest in the United States," Chinese ministry of commerce spokesman Shen Danyang said.

The distrust stems from what is seen as an increasingly assertive China that is pouring money into building up its military and, US defence officials have warned, its ability to potentially use high-tech means to disrupt US communications or information systems.

China already has been accused of being a major source of international computer hacking and cyberattacks, although Beijing denies involvement.

Compounding the issue is the generally opaque nature of many Chinese companies, which often seem secretive in the west, where there is more pressure for corporate transparency.

ZTE Vice President He Shiyou. US security fears over two China telecom firms have spotlighted Western suspicions Chinese companies are state-influenced, a culture clash analysts say could loom larger as the country's businesses look overseas.

"They can either operate according to the logic that works in China or they can operate according to the logic that works in the US," said Scott Harold, a China expert at the US-based Rand Corporation.

"But sometimes they will not be able to operate according to both logics simultaneously since they're incompatible."

A research report by Fitch Ratings said US sales for Huawei and ZTE account for less than five percent of their revenues and the House committee move was unlikely to immediately affect their bottom lines.

"A more meaningful impact could arise if more countries decide to avoid the Chinese manufacturers over alleged national security concerns," they wrote.

Just after the US Congressional report release, Canada said it had invoked a "national security exception" that could exclude Huawei from a role in helping build a new secure government network, as the country rebuilds networks damaged by cyber attacks in 2010.

Australia earlier this year blocked Huawei from bidding for contracts on a huge national broadband network.

Analysts said security is a legitimate concern when assessing foreign investment in areas such as telecoms with bearing on national security.

But there is a danger that protectionist sentiments could get out of hand, harming Chinese companies that pose no threat, said John Lee, an expert on China's political economy and foreign policy.

"The decision of the House committee can potentially be misused by various groups in the West to justify protectionism, to justify irrational fear of foreign investment, particularly Chinese investment, so it's very important that that doesn't occur," said Lee, of the University of Sydney.

Anti-China rhetoric is climbing in the US, especially as the presidential campaign kicks into high gear with both candidates seeking to emphasise their tough-on-China credentials.

A broader impact on Chinese companies has yet to emerge, but Chovanec said excessive anti-China feelings could be counter-productive for the US economy.

"There are Chinese companies that have made investments in the United States, have contributed to jobs in the United States. It would be a shame if they were tarred by the same concerns that we ran into here (with Huawei and ZTE)," he said.

Explore further: Sony's PlayStation back online after Christmas hack

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

China rejects US claims over telecom firms

Oct 10, 2012

A US Congressional report that warns two Chinese telecom companies pose a national security risk and should face restrictions in the US market is "groundless", China has said.

Amid US probe, China telecom firms defend record

Sep 13, 2012

The leaders of a congressional probe into two Chinese telecom giants expressed fresh concerns Thursday about the firm's links to the Beijing government, as the companies defended their integrity.

Huawei: Australia law could exclude China firms

Sep 14, 2012

(AP)—An official of Chinese telecoms equipment giant Huawei Technologies said Friday he is concerned that new Australian laws to protect communication networks from cyber-attacks could exclude companies from tendering for ...

Huawei's global ambitions come under a cloud (Update)

Oct 09, 2012

Chinese telecom firm Huawei's ambitions to become a global brand rivalling Apple and Samsung have been hit by a US report claiming that the company, founded by a former Chinese soldier, posed an espionage ...

Sprint axes China's Huawei, ZTE on security grounds: WSJ

Nov 06, 2010

Sprint Nextel is excluding China's Huawei Technologies and ZTE Corp. from a multi-billion dollar contract to upgrade its cellular network largely because of national security concerns in Washington, The Wall ...

Recommended for you

Sony's PlayStation 'gradually coming back'

15 hours ago

Sony was still struggling Saturday to fully restore its online PlayStation system, three days after the Christmas day hack that also hit Microsoft's Xbox, reporting that services were "gradually coming back."

Uber broke Indian financial rules: central bank chief

15 hours ago

India's central bank chief lashed out at Uber, already under fire over the alleged rape of a passenger, saying the US taxi-hailing firm violated the country's financial regulations by using an overseas payment ...

Taxi app Uber defies ban in Spain

Dec 26, 2014

Smartphone car-ride service Uber vowed Friday to keep operating in Spain despite a ban following a lawsuit by taxi drivers and said it would fight the case in court.

Sony film mess reflects gadgets-entertainment gap

Dec 26, 2014

Sony's iconic gadgetry and the star appeal of Hollywood may have appeared to be a perfect match when the electronics giant bought Columbia Pictures in 1989. A quarter century later, it's apparent that Sony ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dirk_bruere
not rated yet Oct 21, 2012
The answer is that the USA does not use Chinese tech in its critical sectors, and China does not use US tech in theirs.
alfie_null
not rated yet Oct 22, 2012
What's a critical sector? Easier to ask what's not a critical sector.
Multinational companies, gray markets, provenance of all the components and subsystems. A messy issue, no simple answer.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.