New type of cosmic ray discovered after 100 years

Oct 16, 2012
The region of the Arches cluster seen in X-rays (contours) and in the near infrared (background image). The infrared map is obtained from observations by the Hubble space telescope at the 1.875 µm wavelength (data taken from Dong et al. 2011, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 417, 114). The contours show the strength of the neutral iron line observed by XMM-Newton around the star cluster (located in the center of the image). The X-ray emission is produced by cosmic rays accelerated in the shock wave formed in the interstellar medium by the supersonic motion of the cluster. In the image, the cluster is traveling from right to left at about 700 000 km/h. Credit: V. Tatischeff.

(Phys.org)—Using the European X-ray astronomy satellite XMM-Newton, researchers from CNRS and CEA have discovered a new source of cosmic rays. In the vicinity of the remarkable Arches cluster, near the center of the Milky Way, these particles are accelerated in the shock wave generated by tens of thousands of young stars moving at a speed of around 700,000 km/h. These cosmic rays produce a characteristic X-ray emission by interacting with the atoms in the surrounding gas. Their origin differs from that of the cosmic rays discovered exactly a hundred years ago by Victor Hess, which originate in the explosions of supernovae. The findings are published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.

A hundred years ago, the Austrian physicist Victor Franz Hess discovered the existence of ionizing radiation of extraterrestrial origin, which he called cosmic rays. Today, their nature is well understood. When certain stars at the end of their lives explode and become supernovae, their matter is ejected at supersonic speed, generating shock waves that accelerate the particles. As a result, some atomic nuclei gain very high kinetic energy and enter the Earth's atmosphere.

However, low-energy cosmic rays are not detected in the region of our planet, since the solar wind prevents them from entering the heliosphere. Little is therefore known about their chemical composition and flux outside the Solar System, although everything suggests they play a significant role in the Galaxy. For instance, by ionizing and heating the densest interstellar clouds, they probably regulate the formation of stars.

The authors of the article began by studying the X-ray emission that should theoretically be generated by low-energy cosmic rays in the interstellar medium. They then looked for signs of this theoretical emission in X-ray data collected by XMM- since its launch in 1999. By analyzing the properties of the X-ray emission of interstellar iron recorded by the satellite, they found the signatures of a large fast ion population in the vicinity of the Arches cluster, about one hundred light-years from the center of the Milky Way. The stars in this cluster are traveling together at a speed of approximately 700,000 km/h. The cosmic rays are in all likelihood produced in the high-speed collision of the star cluster with a gas cloud in its path. In this particular region, the energy density of the accelerated ions is around a thousand times greater than that of cosmic rays in the neighborhood of the Solar System.  

This is the first time that a major source of low-energy has been discovered outside the Solar System. It shows that the of supernovae are not the only objects that can cause mass acceleration of atomic nuclei in the Galaxy. These findings should make it possible to identify new sources of ions in the interstellar medium, and may lead to a better understanding of the effects of these energetic on star formation.  

Explore further: 'Perfect storm' quenching star formation around a supermassive black hole

More information: Nonthermal X-rays from low-energy cosmic rays: Application to the 6.4 keV line emission from the Arches cluster region, V. Tatischeff, A. Decourchelle, and G. Maurin, A&A, 2012, 546, A88, dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201219016

Related Stories

Galactic Center Found To Glow Unevenly

Feb 21, 2006

An international team of more than 100 astrophysicists said they have detected very-high-energy gamma rays emanating from the huge gas clouds known to pervade the center of the Milky Way galaxy.

Oh-My-God Particles

Jun 13, 2011

Cosmic rays are really sub-atomic particles, being mainly protons (hydrogen nuclei) and occasionally helium or heavier atomic nuclei and very occasionally electrons. Cosmic ray particles are very energetic ...

On the Scent of a Pre-Historic Particle Accelerator?

Feb 09, 2006

An international team of astrophysicists have used the H.E.S.S. telescopes to uncover the trail of a 10,000 year old supernova at the heart of the Milky Way. In a paper published in Nature (6th February 2006), they descri ...

Recommended for you

The hot blue stars of Messier 47

Dec 17, 2014

Messier 47 is located approximately 1600 light-years from Earth, in the constellation of Puppis (the poop deck of the mythological ship Argo). It was first noticed some time before 1654 by Italian astronomer ...

Why is space black?

Dec 16, 2014

Imagine you're in space. Just the floating part, not the peeing into a vacuum hose or eating that funky "ice cream" from foil bags part. If you looked at the Sun, it would be bright and your retinas would ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PhotonX
4.7 / 5 (14) Oct 16, 2012
All right, maybe I'm just in nitpicking mode today, but when I saw this article I thought "Really!?!" Wouldn't this article be more aptly named "New source of cosmic rays..." instead of "New type..."?
axemaster
4 / 5 (4) Oct 16, 2012
I agree with you PhotonX... but it's not like Physorg hasn't used sensational headlines before.

The stars in this cluster are traveling together at a speed of approximately 700,000 km/h.

Relative to what? Why do they just state a meaningless velocity... shoddy work folks.
dtyarbrough
1 / 5 (6) Oct 17, 2012
Nonthermal x-rays ... What have I been saying all along. It doesn't take millions of degrees to create x-rays. The solar corona is an example of the very thing they are discussing here. Solar particles(cosmic rays) disturbing the surrounding gases. It won't be long till people will read my theories and say "duh..anybody can see that. What's the big deal?"
visionabler
2.3 / 5 (3) Oct 17, 2012
100% of these comments should be deleted.
Trenchant
3 / 5 (4) Oct 17, 2012
Ok, I fell for it. I took 30 seconds to look up D.T. Yarbrough to see what his "theories" are. 30 seconds of my life wasted, that I will never get back.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (2) Oct 17, 2012
I agree with you PhotonX... but it's not like Physorg hasn't used sensational headlines before.

Physorg doesn't author anything. This is an aggregation site. All the headlines (and the content of all the articles) are verbatim copies from the source (that's why you sometimes see weird line-breaks and hyphenations here. Because the paragraph width may differ from the source).

Just paste the headline into google. You'll see what I mean.
Gawad
not rated yet Oct 17, 2012
Aren't Bob, Lisa, et al. Physorg staff writers? Or are least as regular contributors they come pretty close.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Oct 17, 2012
If you go to the 'about' section it says they have 7 (full time) staff and 6 (presumably non-full time) writers. Physorg adds 75 to 100 articles per day (as per the wikipedia entry on physorg) - even on weekends and around the clock. So by my count that means at any one time you have max. 3-4 people actively looking after the site and working on it.

Researching and properly writing up an article takes a bit of time (as does administration work). So the overwhelming part is likely aggregated from other sources.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.