Coal gasification demonstrated

October 23, 2012 by Linda Morton
Coal gasification demonstrated
Molten catalytic reactor design. Steam and coal react in a bed of molten alkali salts. Isometric and cutaway views. (Furnace not shown.)

DOE's National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) has developed a molten catalytic process for converting coal into a synthesis gas consisting of roughly 20% methane and 80% hydrogen using alkali hydroxides as both gasification catalysts and in situ CO2 and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) capture agents.  This hydrogen- and methane-rich output from the gasifier could be sent to gas turbines or solid oxide fuel cells in order to generate electricity with CO2 emissions significantly less than 1.0 lbs of CO2 per kWh of electricity. 

A patent application on this topic has been submitted and a paper entitled "Molten Catalytic Coal Gasification With In Situ Carbon and Sulphur Capture" was published by the Royal Society of Chemistry's journal Energy & Environment Science. 

Baseline studies were conducted using no catalyst, weak capture agents (calcium silicate), and a strong in situ capture agent for acid gases (calcium oxide-CaO). Parametric studies were conducted to understand the effects of temperature, pressure, catalyst composition, steam flow rate and the ratio of coal to hydroxide on the performance of the molten catalytic gasifier in terms of kinetics and syngas composition. 

To measure the amount and the rate of coal conversion, the researchers developed a method for quantifying the coal conversion related to the chemical oxygen demand remaining in the coal. This method was necessary because the capture reactions and the water condenser before the mass spectrometer make a real-time elemental balance impossible. 

For many different reforming, gasification, and combustion experiments, measuring the change in the chemical oxygen demand of coal/fuel can be a more useful definition of coal/fuel utilization than measuring the change in the weight of the coal/fuel or measuring the change in carbon content of the coal/fuel.

Explore further: Environmentally safer catalyst proves more active in hydrogen production

More information:!divAbstract

Related Stories

Coal Liquefaction

January 9, 2006

The tightening of worldwide oil reserves is causing the price of oil to escalate — and makes coal, which is much more abundantly available, an interesting starting material for liquid fuels and chemical raw materials. Researchers ...

Coal gasification -- myths, challenges and opportunities

February 15, 2008

There is a growing consensus that increased demand for electricity will cement coal’s place in the energy portfolio for years to come. In fact, more than half of the electricity produced in the United States comes from ...

Recommended for you

Internet giants race to faster mobile news apps

October 4, 2015

US tech giants are turning to the news in their competition for mobile users, developing new, faster ways to deliver content, but the benefits for struggling media outlets remain unclear.

Radio frequency 'harvesting' tech unveiled in UK

September 30, 2015

An energy harvesting technology that its developers say will be able to turn ambient radio frequency waves into usable electricity to charge low power devices was unveiled in London on Wednesday.

Professors say US has fallen behind on offshore wind power

September 29, 2015

University of Delaware faculty from the College of Earth, Ocean, and Environment (CEOE), the College of Engineering and the Alfred Lerner School of Business and Economics say that the U.S. has fallen behind in offshore wind ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Oct 23, 2012
How does it comapre in terms of efficiency and environmental impact with coalplants that have post burning carbon scrubbers?
not rated yet Oct 24, 2012
You have to wonder where all of the other nasty materials go, like the mercury, chromium, and sulfur that's typically found in coal?
1 / 5 (1) Oct 24, 2012
You have to wonder where all of the other nasty materials go, like the mercury, chromium, and sulfur that's typically found in coal?

In Situ means most nasty materials including the excess carbon remain in the coal bed. A cost comparison to cheap natural gas would be helpful. Not having to mine and ship coal is an advantage but cheap natural gas may make this a useful future potential process.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 24, 2012
Going back to 19th century technology may not be real smart. There aer thousands of manufactured gas plants lying about that need cleaned up.
1 / 5 (1) Oct 25, 2012
Interesting, as far as it goes, BUT where do the alkali hydroxides come from? They have to be generated electrolytically from the chhlorides, producing chlorine.

Where does all that chlorine get used? Primarily, in the production of chlorinated plastics. The balance between alkali hydroxide production/usage and chlorine usage is somewhat in balance today.

What happens if something like this scheme is used widely to produce H2/CH4 for electricity production? Where does all that excess chlorine go (as opposed to the CO2 if the coal was burned to generate electricity conventionally)? Which is worse for the environment all natural and essential CO2 or chlorine?

There is no free lunch!

Just another example of your government wasting your money.
not rated yet Oct 25, 2012
Should be able to process several ounces a month.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.