Stellar makeup impacts habitable zone evolution

Sep 07, 2012
Astrobiologists and planetary scientists agree that a planet’s distance from its parent star is of paramount importance for creating those optimum conditions. A new study by Arizona State University researchers suggests that the host star’s chemical makeup can also impact conditions of habitability of planets that orbit them. Credit: NASA

(Phys.org)—A star's internal chemistry can doom a planet's life long before the star itself dies.

The search for potentially involves discussion of what is sometimes referred to as the Goldilocks Zone – the relatively thin band in a solar system in which conditions on a planet can support life.

Astrobiologists and planetary scientists agree that a planet's distance from its is of paramount importance for creating those optimum conditions – like Goldilocks' porridge, it has to be just right.

A new study by Arizona State University researchers suggests that the host star's chemical makeup also can impact conditions of of planets that orbit them. The team's paper, published in the August issue of The , demonstrates that subtle differences in a star's internal chemistry can have huge effects on a planet's chances of long-term habitability.

"We have identified changes in the ratios of different elements as particularly important for a given solar system's habitability," says Patrick Young, an assistant professor in ASU's School of Earth and Space Exploration and lead author on the paper. "The more abundant elements carbon, oxygen, silicon, magnesium and sodium are particularly important. The greater the abundances of these four elements in a star, the slower it, and the location of its Goldilocks Zone, will evolve."

As a star evolves, it becomes brighter, causing the habitable zone to move outwards through its solar system. The team's study indicates that a greater abundance of oxygen, carbon, sodium, magnesium and silicon should be a plus for an 's long-term habitability because the abundance of these elements make the star cooler and cause it to evolve more slowly, thereby giving planets in its habitable zone more time to develop life as we know it.

To explore whether stellar internal chemistry causes significant changes in the evolution of and therefore their habitable zones, Young and his colleagues, graduate students Mike Pagano and Kelley Liebst, did simulations of stars that are like our sun.

"We used spectra from 145 broadly sun-like stars targeted by planet to estimate the amount of variation in the abundance ratios of elements," explains Pagano, who is a graduate student in the School of Earth and Space Exploration astrophysics program. "For each model, we varied the amount of one element to the extremes of variation we estimated from our analysis of the observations."

The largest changes, unsurprisingly, arise from variation in oxygen.

"Oxygen is the most abundant element in the universe besides hydrogen and helium, so a change in the oxygen abundance results in a significant change in the total amount of heavy elements in the star," Pagano said. "Oxygen turns out to be highly variable in abundance. The effect of increased heavy element abundance on a star is to make it harder for the energy produced by nuclear fusion to escape the star. This means less energy needs to be produced to support the star, and it can live longer."

The stellar abundance of oxygen seems crucial in determining how long planets stay in the habitable zone around their . If there had been less oxygen in the Sun's , for example, Earth likely would have been pushed out of the Sun's about a billion years ago, well before complex organisms evolved. Considering the first complex multicellular organisms only arose about 650 million years ago, such a move would have likely destroyed any chance of complex life taking hold on Earth.

Planets being searched for signs of life may be about to leave their habitable zones or only have just entered them.

"Habitability is very difficult to quantify because it depends on a huge number of variables, some of which we have yet to identify," says Young. "It also depends on the definition of habitable that we choose to use. We chose to use a relatively simple model that predicts whether a planet can sustain liquid water on its surface with reasonable assumptions about planetary atmospheres."

Explore further: Transiting exoplanet with longest known year

Related Stories

Habitable zones

Aug 22, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- The "habitable zone" is the region around a star where a suitable planet could sustain the conditions necessary for life. Most astronomers take it to be the region where the balance between ...

Greenhouse effect could extend habitable zone

Aug 26, 2011

The distant region beyond Saturn is too cold for liquid water, a necessity for life as we know it. But new research indicates that rocky planets far from their parent star could generate enough heat to keep ...

Goldilocks moons

Jan 16, 2012

The search for extraterrestrial life outside our Solar System is currently focused on extrasolar planets within the ‘habitable zones’ of exoplanetary systems around stars similar to the Sun. Finding ...

Elements of ExoPlanets

Feb 02, 2012

By looking at the wavelengths of light from nearby stars, researchers have determined the abundance of certain elements for more than a hundred stars. Trace elements in such stars may influence their habitable ...

Could 2012 be the year we find extraterrestrial life?

Jan 19, 2012

Last year came to an exciting end with the discovery of an Earth-like planet, Kepler-22b, orbiting a sun-like star outside of our solar system. It was found by NASA’s Kepler mission and is the first planet ...

Recommended for you

Transiting exoplanet with longest known year

22 hours ago

Astronomers have discovered a transiting exoplanet with the longest known year. Kepler-421b circles its star once every 704 days. In comparison, Mars orbits our Sun once every 780 days. Most of the 1,800-plus ...

Mysterious dance of dwarfs may force a cosmic rethink

Jul 21, 2014

(Phys.org) —The discovery that many small galaxies throughout the universe do not 'swarm' around larger ones like bees do but 'dance' in orderly disc-shaped orbits is a challenge to our understanding of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dschlink
not rated yet Sep 07, 2012
It is also reasonable to think that stars with few other elements wouldn't have rocky planets in the first place.
Torbjorn_Larsson_OM
5 / 5 (1) Sep 07, 2012
This may be a problem for heavy G,K stars, but the majority of habitable systems will be M stars which develop really slowly anyway.

@ dschlink:

Actually metallicity only affects likelihood for gas and ice giants (which go down as the disk evolves faster at higher metallicity), until you hit some very low limit that isn't well known yet. It seems more stars, and earlier generation of stars, forms more planets than believed.

The oldest known planet is ~ 12.7 billion years old. At that time the general metallicity was low. [ http://en.wikiped...620-26_b ]