Researchers at SLAC find too many taus decay from bottom quarks to fit Standard Model

Sep 12, 2012 by Bob Yirka report
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

(—In a reminder that not all important physics work is going on at CERN, researchers at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) have been sending positrons and electrons into storage rings left over from its now non-operational particle accelerator and have found, as they describe in their paper published in the journal Physical Review Letters, that the amount of taus produced as bottom (b) quarks decay, is more than has been predicated by the Standard Model, and indicates problems with the supersymmetry (SUSY) theory as well.

The Standard Model is a general theory that was created over several decades and finalized in the 1970's to describe everything that exists, i.e. all known matter, and how it all works together. Unfortunately new science has been poking holes in much of it over the past several years, which has led to new theories such as SUSY. This new research further degrades the usefulness of the Standard Model and even casts doubt on SUSY.

In their experiments, the researchers at Stanford have been causing and electrons to collide at the point of their BaBar detector. As the collisions occur and the particles are knocked apart B mesons (hadrons that are made of two quarks) are produced. But they don't last long, they decay into D or D* mesons, charged leptons, or neutrinos. In this case, the team focused on the mesons, which are further classified as either muons or taus. are generally produced in abundance in such collisions, whereas taus are rare, and it's the amount of them that were produced in the collisions at SLAC that has cast doubts on the . Instead of the 20% frequency rate predicted for D mesons, the researchers found a 31% rate (and a 25% rate for D* mesons instead of the predicted 23%). These differences are also significant enough to cause pretty serious problems for SUSY.

To explain the differences between the theories and observed results the researchers suggest that perhaps another Boson is at work; SUSY suggests there may be as many as four, though research at CERN is still ongoing to prove that what was observed earlier this year was in fact an actual Higgs.

In any case, this new research shows that there is still work to be done regarding coming up with a theory that truly does encompass all matter, anti-matter, dark matter, etc. before any consensus can be reached.

Explore further: Breakthrough in OLED technology

More information: Evidence for an Excess of B̅ →D(*)τ-v— τ Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012) DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.101802

Based on the full BABAR data sample, we report improved measurements of the ratios R(D(*))=B(B̅ →D(*)τ-v— τ)/B(B̅ →D(*)ℓℓ-v— ℓ), where ℓ is either e or μ. These ratios are sensitive to new physics contributions in the form of a charged Higgs boson. We measure R(D)=0.440±0.058±0.042 and R(D*)=0.332±0.024±0.018, which exceed the standard model expectations by 2.0σ and 2.7σ, respectively. Taken together, our results disagree with these expectations at the 3.4σ level. This excess cannot be explained by a charged Higgs boson in the type II two-Higgs-doublet model.

via Physics Synopsis

Related Stories

Will the real Higgs Boson please stand up?

Aug 11, 2011

Although physicists from two experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider and from Fermilab’s Tevatron collider recently reported at the Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics that they didn't find ...

Rare particle decay could mean new physics

Aug 23, 2011

( -- An incredibly rare sub-atomic particle decay might not be quite as rare as previously predicted, say Cornell researchers. This discovery, culled from a vast data set at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDF), ...

Physicists testing Nobel-winning theory

Nov 13, 2008

( -- Soeren Prell and a team of Iowa State University researchers are part of an international research team testing a theory that led to a share of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for Japanese researchers Makoto ...

Recommended for you

Breakthrough in OLED technology

13 hours ago

Organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), which are made from carbon-containing materials, have the potential to revolutionize future display technologies, making low-power displays so thin they'll wrap or fold ...

Throwing light on a mysterious human 'superpower'

15 hours ago

Most people, at some point in their lives, have dreamt of being able to fly like Superman or develop superhuman strength like the Hulk. But very few know that we human beings have a "superpower" of our own, ...

New filter could advance terahertz data transmission

Feb 27, 2015

University of Utah engineers have discovered a new approach for designing filters capable of separating different frequencies in the terahertz spectrum, the next generation of communications bandwidth that ...

The super-resolution revolution

Feb 27, 2015

Cambridge scientists are part of a resolution revolution. Building powerful instruments that shatter the physical limits of optical microscopy, they are beginning to watch molecular processes as they happen, ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (3) Sep 12, 2012
So what's up with bottom quarks?
But seriously, I'm amazed that this problem has just been noticed given the huge percentage difference - 11%! - from the standard model prediction for the D decay products. You'd think someone would have seen this years ago.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 12, 2012
Yes, the D's ARE the decay products...more coffee plezz...
3 / 5 (2) Sep 12, 2012
It is a 3 sigma effect, which considering the data fishing expedition used "come and go" as they say.

Ai want mah 5 sigma cheezburgrs, kthxbai!
not rated yet Sep 12, 2012
So what's up with bottom quarks?
But seriously, I'm amazed that this problem has just been noticed given the huge percentage difference - 11%! - from the standard model prediction for the D decay products. You'd think someone would have seen this years ago.

Perhaps it wiil turn out that they are "bottom-less", and therefore not the "fundament"al particles they are thought to be.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.