Samsung plans to add iPhone 5 to patent war

Sep 21, 2012
A Samsung phone (R) and an Apple iPhone 4 are shown. South Korea's Samsung Electronics said it was considering adding Apple's new iPhone 5 to a patent infringement case as part of a long-running global legal battle between the rival smartphone giants.

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Friday it was considering adding Apple's new iPhone 5 to a patent infringement case as part of a long-running global legal battle between the rival smartphone giants.

Samsung officials said the company would look into amending its side of an ongoing in a US court to include the latest Apple gadget, which went on sale across Asia Friday and is due to hit US stores later in the day.

"Our company considers adding Apple's iPhone 5 to the (patent infringement) case... but we cannot say when," a Samsung spokesman told AFP.

"Our decision will be made after our company has analysed the 5 to see what aspects of its device constitutes patent infringement."

South Korea's Yonhap news agency quoted market watchers as saying Samsung may use its long-term evolution (LTE) to attack the —the first Apple phone to use the fourth-generation .

Samsung and Apple—respectively the world's number one and two smartphone makers—have been at loggerheads over dozens of patent lawsuits in 10 nations, accusing each other of copying technologies and designs.

Last month, a California court ordered Samsung to pay $1.05 billion for patent infringement. The South Korean firm has appealed the decision.

Samsung, in a statement late Thursday, accused Apple of continuing to take "aggressive legal measures that will limit market competition".

It added: "Under these circumstances, we have little choice but to take the steps necessary to protect our innovations and intellectual property rights." lim/gh/dan

Explore further: Microsoft's expanding cloud platform shines brightly

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Samsung files lawsuits against Apple

Apr 22, 2011

(AP) -- South Korea's Samsung Electronics Co. says it sued Apple Inc. for patent rights violations, only days after Apple sued Samsung for the same reason. ...

Apple files new Samsung patent action in US

Sep 01, 2012

Apple has filed a fresh patent infringement action in the United States against Samsung, alleging that the South Korean company is continuing to steal its technology despite a recent court ruling.

Samsung to contest US verdict in favour of Apple

Aug 25, 2012

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Saturday it will contest a US court ruling that it must pay rival technology giant Apple damages of more than $1 billion for patent violations.

Dutch court rules against Apple in Samsung case

Jun 20, 2012

A Dutch court ruled on Wednesday that Apple has infringed on a patent held by South Korean rival Samsung and ordered the US computer giant to pay an unspecified amount of damages.

Australian court rules Samsung can sell Galaxy

Dec 09, 2011

(AP) -- Samsung Electronics Co. is free to sell its Galaxy tablet computers in Australia after the country's highest court Friday dismissed rival Apple's appeal in its global patent battle.

Recommended for you

Ericsson profit down 10 pct despite higher sales

2 hours ago

Wireless equipment maker Ericsson says its third-quarter earnings slumped 10 percent despite higher sales due to increased operating costs and negative effects from currency hedging.

Glass maker deals to exit Apple, Arizona plant

4 hours ago

Nearly 2,000 furnaces installed in a factory to make synthetic sapphire glass for Apple Inc. will be removed and sold under a deal between the tech giant and the company that had been gearing up to produce huge amounts of ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
5 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2012
This is, in my opinion, very stupid. Samsung and Apple need to come to an agreement that does not cost the rest of the human race some astronomical legal fees. Remember, the consumer ultimately will pay for all of this.
ValeriaT
5 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2012
Of course it's stupid, but the lawyers and patent officers will profit on it - and just these guys are, who controls the rules in this field. It's the same situation, like with acceptation of cold fusion - just the scientists, who could decide it are the group of people, who is least motivated into it.

We could break this vicious circle just with change of the global rules, but just the lobby which profits from it is what defines these rules in the way, which leads into another and another waves of patent wars. For example the recent change in US patent law enables to patent wheel without any prior art conditions. Of course, such a law will initiate many new patents and patent lawsuits, which will serve as a stable job and salary generator for both patent officers, both patent lawyers, both government officers, who profit from patent fees too.