Samsung 'disappointed' at US judge's tablet decision

Sep 20, 2012

Samsung Electronics said Thursday it was "disappointed" at a US judge's refusal to lift a ban on US sales of its tablet computer as it fights a long-running global legal battle with arch-rival Apple.

A California jury declared on August 24 that the South Korean electronics giant should pay Apple $1.049 billion in damages for illegally copying and iPad features for its flagship Galaxy S smartphones.

But the jury said Samsung did not abuse design patents that were the grounds for a temporary ban—placed by US Lucy Koh in June—on Galaxy Tab 10.1 device imports.

However, Koh wrote in a ruling Wednesday that she would grant Samsung's request to lift the ban if she could, but no longer had authority to make the call since the firm appealed to a higher court to have the ban overturned.

"We are disappointed by the court's decision. We will continue to take all appropriate measures to ensure consumer access to our innovative products," Samsung said in a statement Thursday.

Samsung and Apple—respectively the world's number one and two smartphone makers—have been at over dozens of patent lawsuits in 10 nations, accusing each other of copying technologies and designs.

The decision on August 24 appeared to be an overwhelming victory for Apple, but it was not immediately clear whether it would halt sales of Samsung devices or affect newer models released since the case was filed.

Samsung has sold more than 20 million units of its latest Galaxy S III smartphones since its launch in late May and is set to soon release the newest version of the oversized Galaxy Note smartphones.

Apple, which previously filed actions on earlier versions of the Galaxy S series, added Galaxy S III to the list in a fresh complaint filed on September 1, further intensifying pressure on Samsung.

Explore further: Toshiba Clean Room Farm Yokosuka begins vegetable production

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US judge won't lift Samsung tablet ban

Sep 19, 2012

A judge has refused to lift a ban on US sales of Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computers as legal brawling continued between the South Korean electronics titan and Apple.

Australian court rules Samsung can sell Galaxy

Dec 09, 2011

(AP) -- Samsung Electronics Co. is free to sell its Galaxy tablet computers in Australia after the country's highest court Friday dismissed rival Apple's appeal in its global patent battle.

Samsung files patent complaint against Apple in France

Sep 12, 2011

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Monday it had filed a complaint in France against its US rival Apple for infringement of three mobile phone technology patents in its iPhone and iPad tablet computers.

Samsung pulls tablet PC from trade show amid row

Sep 05, 2011

South Korea's Samsung Electronics said Monday it has withdrawn its new tablet computer from a major electronics fair in Berlin after a German court accepted a complaint from US rival Apple.

Recommended for you

Canada demands Google, Netflix data, sets deadline

4 hours ago

Canada's broadcast regulator on Monday gave American companies Google and Netflix a three-day deadline to turn over subscriber data or have their testimony expunged from a major public hearing, media reported.

Lenovo looks to expand after IBM acquisition

Sep 29, 2014

Lenovo Group has received U.S. and European approval to complete its acquisition of IBM Corp.'s low-end server business and plans to use it to grow faster outside its personal computer business, Lenovo's ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
5 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2012
If I asked someone I trusted which tablet I should buy and the answer was Samsung, and then found that I couldn't get it in "THIS" country, I certainly wouldn't buy the table from the company that caused this dislocation.
And I'd put that company on my 'never purchase from' list.
VendicarD
5 / 5 (1) Sep 21, 2012
I would never purchase an apple product since that company has used underhanded methods to deprive me of superior products from it's competition.