A third of US public fears police use of drones

Sep 27, 2012 by Joan Lowy

More than a third of Americans worry their privacy will suffer if drones like those used to spy on U.S. enemies overseas become the latest police tool for tracking suspected criminals at home, according to an Associated Press-National Constitution Center poll.

Congress has directed the to come up with that will clear the way for routine domestic use of within the next three years.

The government is under pressure from a wide range of interests to open U.S. skies to drones.

Oil companies want them to monitor pipelines. Environmentalists want them to count on remote islands. Farmers want them to fly over crops with sensors that can detect which fields are wet and which need watering. They're already being used to help fight forest fires. And the list goes on.

Manufacturers are also keen to cash in on what they expect to be a burgeoning new drone market. Government and commercial drone-related expenditures are forecast to total $89 billion worldwide over the next decade.

On the leading edge of that new market are state and local departments, who say that in many cases drones are cheaper, more practical and more effective than manned aircraft. Most of them would be small drones, generally weighing less than 55 pounds (25 kilograms). They could be used, for example, to search for missing children or to scout a location ahead of a police raid.

But caution that drones equipped with powerful cameras, including the latest that can "see" through walls, listening devices and other information-gathering technology raise the specter of a surveillance society in which the activities of ordinary citizens are monitored and recorded by the authorities.

Nearly half the public, 44 percent, supports allowing inside the U.S. to use drones to assist police work, but a significant minority—36 percent—say they "strongly oppose" or "somewhat oppose" police use of drones, according to a survey last month.

When asked if they were concerned that police departments' use of drones for surveillance might cause them to lose privacy, 35 percent of respondents said they were "extremely concerned" or "very concerned." An almost identical share, 36 percent, said they were "not too concerned" or "not concerned at all."

Twenty-four percent fell in the middle, saying they were "somewhat concerned" about a potential loss of personal privacy.

David Eisner, president and chief executive of the constitution center in Philadelphia, said he was surprised by the level of support for police use of drones.

"I had assumed that the idea that American police would be using the same technology that our military is using in Afghanistan would garner an almost hysterical response," Eisner said. Support for drone use "shows that people are feeling less physically secure than they'd like to because they are willing to accept fairly extreme police action to improve that security."

There was a gender gap in the poll, with men were more concerned about a loss of privacy if police start using drones than women—40 percent to 30 percent. There was an even wider gap between white and black respondents, with 48 percent of blacks strongly concerned about a loss of privacy compared to 32 percent of whites.

Responding to public concern, a drone industry trade group and the International Association of Police Chiefs have separately released voluntary guidelines for drone use in recent months.

"A lot of the public doesn't understand how the technology is being used," said Gretchen West, vice president of the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International. "Law enforcement use (drones) to do the same thing they've used manned aircraft for years, it's just that () are more affordable and usually a more efficient option."

The National Constitution Center is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that operates a Philadelphia museum and other educational programs about the Constitution.

The AP-NCC Poll was conducted by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Corporate Communications from Aug. 16-20, using landline and cellphone interviews with 1,006 randomly chosen adults. The margin of sampling error was plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

Explore further: Engineers tap gaming technology to improve design

5 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Protect privacy from drones at home, lawmakers say

Jul 19, 2012

Before thousands of civilian drones begin flying in U.S. skies, Congress should take steps to protect the public's privacy and prevent terrorists from hacking or jamming signals that control the aircraft, lawmakers said Thursday.

FAA probing News Corp.'s use of drones

Aug 08, 2011

(AP) -- With the newsgathering techniques of its sister publications in Britain under fire, News Corp. is facing a probe into the use of drones by its U.S.-based digital publication, The Daily.

Recommended for you

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Jeweller
not rated yet Sep 27, 2012
The next step would be a spy fly on the wall inside your house.
VendicarD
1 / 5 (1) Sep 27, 2012
The U.S. Public fears everything.

They are constantly filling their diapers.

It is high time the world is rid of them as a nation and along with them their cowardly whining.
cantdrive85
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 27, 2012
"I had assumed that the idea that American police would be using the same technology that our military is using in Afghanistan would garner an almost hysterical response," Eisner said. Support for drone use "shows that people are feeling less physically secure than they'd like to because they are willing to accept fairly extreme police action to improve that security."

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Franklin
dacarls
not rated yet Sep 28, 2012
If Big Brother has a simple spy camera inside every house, he can keep the data in the cloud until you appear to be "Guilty" of something. Thus, even years later, you too will be easily convicted by the video, particularly if you have mouthed words to yourself while you were thinking. Thus conviction by your own hasty words.....and thoughts. And Heaven forbid you should write down bad thoughts about the secret police!
VendicarD
not rated yet Sep 29, 2012
Well, just look at Julean Assange. He is now officially an enemy of the state in America. Just talking to him can land an American in prison.

"And Heaven forbid you should write down bad thoughts about the secret police!" - dacarls