Global protests planned over gas drilling process

Sep 22, 2012 by Kevin Begos

(AP)—More than 100 protests against the natural gas drilling process known as fracking are scheduled to take place around the world on Saturday, building on public concerns but also using an overly simplified message to spur outrage.

are planned in cities that include New York, Paris, Madrid and Pittsburgh.

The GlobalFrackdown website and campaign was developed by Food & Water Watch, a Washington, D.C. nonprofit that was once part of Ralph Nader's Public Citizen group. The campaign claims that fracking "has already damaged communities and ruined lives. It pollutes water and makes people sick."

Scientists disagree on the risks of fracking, a process that injects large volumes of water, sand, and chemicals underground to break rock apart and free the gas. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and many state regulators, however, say that fracking can be done safely. The American Lung Association says has helped reduce air pollution as many dirtier coal-fired power plants shift to natural gas.

The immense volumes of natural gas found in formations of shale rock around the country has spurred a boom in natural gas production that has been credited with creating jobs and lowering prices for industry and consumers.

The Frackdown campaign doesn't mention the differing opinions over risks or any benefits of fracking.

Mark Schlosberg, the national organizing director for Food & Water Watch, said supporters of the campaign are concerned about access to safe drinking water now and in the future. And some people simply don't want fracking in their communities, he said.

"The message is, we need to ban fracking," he said. "We think fracking is just another dirty fossil fuel."

Shale is a rock formation thousands of feet (meters) underground. Among its largest U.S. deposits are the Marcellus Shale, under parts of Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio and West Virginia, and the Barnett Shale is in north Texas. Geologists knew shale contained gas, but for more than 100 years the industry focused on shallower reserves. Fracking—also called hydraulic fracturing—allows drillers to profitably extract the deep shale gas.

Contaminated wastewater from the process can leak from faulty well casings into aquifers, but it's often difficult to prove a connection. Some studies also have shown air quality problems around gas wells, while others have indicated no problems.

Regulators contend that overall, water and air pollution problems are rare, but environmental groups and some scientists say there hasn't been enough research on those issues. But some industry leaders also say more needs to be done to address concerns.

At a conference this week in Philadelphia, XTO Energy President Jack Williams acknowledged that some Americans still are very concerned about the impact of shale drilling on their communities and the environment.

"Our industry must take steps to strengthen public confidence," he said.

At the same conference Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett attacked anti-drilling activists as the "unreasoning opposition" who accept that the United States can land a space vehicle on Mars but don't believe energy companies can safely harvest gas a mile under the earth's surface.

Fracking also is being debated around the world. Earlier this month, South Africa decided to allow fracking in the semi-desert Karoo region. Cabinet ministers agreed to lift a year-old moratorium, based on a report by a technical team. Shale gas is being touted as a viable alternative to expensive electricity in a country often short of power, and a boost for the economically depressed Karoo.

There also are spirited debates over fracking in France, Poland, and other European countries.

James Saiers, a professor of hydrology at the Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, said some people on both sides of the fracking debate are locked into assumptions.

"The critics on either side, they tend to believe the worst. And that's unfortunate, because there are sincere people on either side," Saiers said. "It will remain a polarized issue. Even data or evidence is unlikely to change those assumptions."

"My view is we have to promote renewables. But right now we're locked in to fossil fuels for a while longer. And trading natural gas for coal is a benefit," Saiers said.

Explore further: First large-scale carbon capture goes online in Canada

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

English tremors blamed on shale 'fracking'

Nov 02, 2011

(AP) -- The only company in Britain using hydraulic fracturing to release natural gas from shale rock said Wednesday that the controversial technique probably did trigger earth tremors in April and May.

S.Africa extends freeze on shale gas drilling

Aug 18, 2011

South Africa's mining minister on Thursday said no decision will be made on controversial shale gas prospecting until next year with an existing moratorium extended by six months.

Hundreds attend EPA hearing on Pa. gas drilling

Jul 22, 2010

(AP) -- Hundreds of people are attending a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hearing in southwestern Pennsylvania on a controversial natural gas drilling technique called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."

Romania to review moratorium on shale gas

Jun 22, 2012

Romania will review its stand on shale gas when a drilling moratorium expires in December and align itself with a future joint EU position on the controversial issue, Prime Minister Victor Ponta said Friday.

Recommended for you

Report IDs 'major weaknesses' at nuclear-arms lab

9 hours ago

One of the nation's premier nuclear weapons laboratories is being called out by the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Energy for "major weaknesses" in the way it packaged contaminated waste before shipping it to ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

lengould100
1 / 5 (2) Sep 22, 2012
Seems to me there's a fair bit of possibility that much of the opposition to fracking for gas can be traced back to attempts by landowners and neighbours to extort money from the drilling companies. Not saying there's never any case, but of many of the ones I've seen claims for on TV, there was often not much engineering quality information involved in this ultimately engineering issue, from well casing reliability to hydrology to human effects.
ValeriaT
1 / 5 (4) Sep 22, 2012
First documented evidence of cold fusion of hydrogen at nickel comes from 1959, i.e. it's more than fifty years old. And the USA are country, which managed to develop working nuclear bomb from first indicia in 1939 in less than six years. Apparently lotta things changed with USA from this time - where the human inquisitiveness disappeared?
XQZME
2 / 5 (4) Sep 22, 2012
It appears that the anti-fracking cult is as incompetent at researching and understanding science and data as is the Global Warming cult.
kochevnik
5 / 5 (2) Sep 23, 2012
Or the XQZME/NoParker sockpuppet cult of one.
ScooterG
1 / 5 (3) Sep 23, 2012
If a group of consumers can boycott a business, why couldn't a group of businesses blacklist certain consumers? Information-wise, it would be a tall order - but I think fairly doable.

For example: Oil producers identify a group hostile to their business - say EPA. All EPA vehicles and gas card numbers are identified, that information shared amongst gas stations, and gasoline purchases denied.

Same with consumers who whine about fracking, yet expect their homes to be cozy-warm and their energy bill to be low.
ScooterG
1 / 5 (2) Sep 23, 2012
It appears that the anti-fracking cult is as incompetent at researching and understanding science and data as is the Global Warming cult.


LMAO