Glacial thinning has sharply accelerated at major South American icefields

Sep 05, 2012
A perspective view of a glacier on the western side of the Southern Patagonian Ice Field called HPS 12 is shown using data from the Landsat satellite, taken in 2001. On the bottom right, the glacier is visible curving to the left.

For the past four decades scientists have monitored the ebbs and flows of the icefields in the southernmost stretch of South America's vast Andes Mountains, detecting an overall loss of ice as the climate warms. A new study, however, finds that the rate of glacier thinning has increased by about half over the last dozen years in the Southern Patagonian Icefield, compared to the 30 years prior to 2000.

" is kind of a poster child for rapidly changing glacier systems," said Michael Willis, lead author of the study and a research associate at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. "We are characterizing a region that is supplying water to at a big rate, compared to its size."

The Southern Patagonian Icefield together with its smaller northern neighbor, the Northern Patagonian Icefield, are the largest icefields in the – excluding Antarctica. The new study shows that the icefields are losing ice faster since the turn of the century and contributing more to sea level rise than ever before.

The color image is the same HPS 12 glacier in 2010 using data from the ASTER instrument onboard the NASA Terra satellite. The glacier retreat is visible in the lower right portion of the image, where the ice leaves off and the water begins. The researchers say the loss of ice thickness is comparable to the height of the Empire State Building.

Earlier studies determined that between the 1970's and 2000 both icefields, which feed into surrounding oceans as they melt, together raised by an average of .042 millimeters each year. Since 2000, Willis and his colleagues found that number increased to 0.067 mm of sea level rise on average per year – about two percent of total annual since 1998.

The Southern Icefield, which Willis and his colleagues focused on, loses around 20 billion tons (gigatonnes) of ice each year, the scientists calculated, which is roughly 9,000 times the volume of water stored by annually. Cumulatively, the Southern Patagonian Icefield has lost enough water over the last 12 years to cover the entire United States with 2.7 centimeters (about 1 inch) of water. Include melting of both icefields, and that amount increases to 3.3 centimeters (1.2 inches), the scientists report.

The collaborative study between scientists from Cornell University and the Center for Scientific Studies (CECs) in Valdivia, Chile, is publishes 5 September in Geophysical Research Letters, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.

To map the changing Southern Patagonian Icefield, Willis and his colleagues collected information from two different satellite missions. Using 156 satellite images taken over the 12-year period by NASA's Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) instrument and data from the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, the scientists mapped how the Southern Patagonian Icefield changed in height and overall size between February 2000 and March 2012.

The team compared its findings with a different set of observations from twin satellites known as the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE).

"Using ASTER, we think that we have a good idea of where things are changing. But with GRACE we get a good idea of when things are changing. So we have this powerful hybrid," Willis said. From their new map, the scientists identified individual and how much each has thinned – i.e. shrunk in height –since 2000. On average, the Southern Patagonian Icefield glaciers have thinned by about 1.8 meters (5.9 feet) per year.

"We find some glaciers are stagnant and even that some have advanced slightly but on the whole, retreat and thinning is prevalent," Willis said. "Interestingly, we see thinning occurring up to the highest elevations, where presumably it is coldest."

Warming air temperatures contribute to the thinning at the highest and coldest regions of the ice field, Willis said. Moreover warmer temperatures mean greater chances that rain, as opposed to snow, will fall on and around the glaciers. This double threat of warming and more rain may, in turn, change the amount of water beneath the glaciers. More water means less friction, so the glaciers start to move faster as they thin, moving even more ice in to the oceans. Rising lakes at the front of the glaciers may also play a part as they eat away at the icy edges faster, causing the glaciers to retreat even further.

"Precipitation is a huge component and likely causes large changes in mass input, and therefore net balance," said Alex Gardner, an assistant professor at Clark University in Worcester, Massachusetts, who was not involved with the study but studies glaciers and ice sheets. "[This new research] shows very high rates of mass loss and it would be great to see a follow up study on how lakes modify these rates of loss."

Even though scientists have yet to understand exactly how warming temperatures will continue to influence these South American icefields, this new study provides valuable information for future predictions, Gardner said.

"A study like this really provides a strong data set to validate and calibrate glacial models that we could then use to simulate future changes in glaciers," he said. "Modeling is really the only tool we have to provide future predictions."

Explore further: New signs of eruption at Iceland volcano

More information: "Ice Loss from the Southern Patagonian Icefield, South America, between 2000 and 2012" dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053136

Related Stories

Glaciers melting faster than originally thought: study

Apr 04, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of scientists from Aberystwyth University, the University of Exeter and Stockholm University, led by Welsh scientist and Professor Neil Glasser, have released at study published in ...

New satellite data on melting of Himalayan glaciers

Aug 24, 2012

(Phys.org)—There is consensus among scientists that the glaciers in the Himalayas and Tibet are shrinking, but there is disagreement on the extent of the shrinkage because of the difficulty in interpreting ...

Recommended for you

New signs of eruption at Iceland volcano

15 hours ago

Teams monitoring Iceland's Bardarbunga volcano have found evidence of a possible underground eruption as powerful earthquakes continue to shake the area, Icelandic authorities said Thursday.

NASA sees a weaker Tropical Storm Marie

15 hours ago

When NOAA's GOES-West satellite captured an image of what is now Tropical Storm Marie, weakened from hurricane status on August 28, the strongest thunderstorms were located in the southern quadrant of the ...

TRMM analyzes Hurricane Cristobal

16 hours ago

NASA's Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission or TRMM Satellite provided a look under the hood of Hurricane Cristobal as it continues moving north and paralleling the U.S. East Coast. NASA's HS3 hurricane mission ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
4.3 / 5 (6) Sep 05, 2012
Fools!!

Don't they know that there has been no warming for the past fifteen years?

Their claims of retreating, thinning South American glaciers and over all reduction in mass-balance are obvious lies, intended to aid and abet the socialist take over of the world economy so that the treehugging greenies can start taxing the freemarket, confiscating private property, and eating baby-on-a-stick!!!!

cdt
3 / 5 (2) Sep 05, 2012
Yeah, you can take it from climate experts like Caliban. In fact, the climate has been on a one way cooling trend ever since the earth first formed, following the larger scale trend of cooling of the universe caused by accelerating expansion. Glaciers aren't always up to date on the larger scale trends, though, so sometimes they misbehave. They can be forgiven, though, since they're misbehaving themselves out of existence.
cantdrive85
2.7 / 5 (7) Sep 05, 2012
"Modeling is really the only tool we have to provide future predictions."

Apparently they didn't get the 'crystal ball' memo.
PinkElephant
3 / 5 (3) Sep 06, 2012
@cdt,

Actually, the Sun has been getting progressively warmer since the Earth first formed. Eventually, the Sun will not only turn the Earth into a molten ball of magma, but swallow it entirely. So who's to say the climate's been cooling (or will continue to do so?)

But anyway, this only goes to show that all the climate-science global-warming mumbo-jumbo is obviously not only wrong but pointless. We're all toast in the end, so what's the big deal?

:-P
VendicarD
3.9 / 5 (7) Sep 06, 2012
Where are all the Lying Free Market Republicans?

Are they spending their days praying to Romney or something?
cdt
4.2 / 5 (5) Sep 06, 2012
Where are all the Lying Free Market Republicans?


Write it (the climate article) and they will come. They will come.
rubberman
2 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2012
Where are all the Lying Free Market Republicans?


Write it (the climate article) and they will come. They will come.


Perhaps the evidence is too compelling is this case....
OdinsAcolyte
1.7 / 5 (6) Sep 06, 2012
Character assassination is a good cover for bad science.
Four decades? Nothing. It is not important anyway. All things must pass. Glaciers and deserts change and mountains become plains. Seas rise and fall. Maybe something wiser shall follow man. Appreciate what we have while we are here. The sun will continue to warm. A white dwarf is its fate before it burns away long after we are gone. So?