Dark energy: Q&A with Steve Kuhlmann

Sep 18, 2012 by Jared Sagoff

Why do we care about dark energy in the first place?

One of the most fundamental questions that scientists face is to try to figure out what the universe is made of.  We know that is the largest component of the universe, accounting for about 74 percent of the mass and energy that exists combined. If we want to understand the components of the universe, we have to understand dark energy. 

Dark matter makes up another 22 percent, and that's not well understood, either. In a very real sense, we only understand four percent of the universe. To basic scientists like us, that's a crime—that's not allowed.

Sometimes we think we're so smart, because we have all these great tools, but we only understand four percent. That's not good. Dark energy has shaped the history of the universe ever since the Big Bang, and if we want to understand the history of the universe, how it evolved and where it's going from here, dark energy plays a big role in that.

Lastly, dark energy is responsible for the biggest discrepancy in . The best explanation we have for how dark energy works generates predictions that are off by one hundred and twenty orders of magnitude. That's a mind-bogglingly huge number – 10^120. For the people who are making those predictions – high-energy physics theorists and particle physics theorists – it's incredibly daunting. 

Now, we've just found the over at , and at some level that completes the model. We think we know the list, and that makes for a nice package. But when you think you have everything all sorted out and you're still missing something fundamental by 120 orders of magnitude you know you're missing something big.

What is the Dark Energy Survey?

At the most basic level, the Dark Energy Survey is a combined Department of Energy and National Science Foundation project to replace an existing camera on a telescope in Chile. There's a four-meter telescope that sits on a mountaintop that has gotten a new camera built by DOE and NSF. Now that we have what's called "first light," – meaning that the camera's open to the sky—that step is mostly complete. In exchange for building the camera, DOE and NSF get 525 nights of observing over the next five years. So we get to do whatever we want to help ourselves understand dark energy on those nights.

The dark will, in its most basic form, discover hundreds of millions of new galaxies. One of the things we can do with these galaxies is called a lensing study. If you have a clump of dark matter and you have a galaxy behind it, the light from the galaxy is bent around the dark matter. So you can make a three-dimensional map by looking at the lensing from all of these galaxies. That's one of the most powerful tests we'll be doing.

So what's Argonne's role in the DES?

We helped to build the camera, known as DECam. We contributed about 20 percent of the mechanical engineering and design of the camera, and that includes the camera control systems. The shutter is controlled by an Argonne-designed system, and likewise the cooling system that maintains the charge-coupled devices (CCDs) – the heart of a digital camera – was built by Argonne. 

We have very special CCDs, and so we did tests on them here at the Advanced Photon Source. We used the X-ray beam as a scanning tool to test for the uniformity of the CCDs. So I'd say those are our main contributions to the camera.

What does the future of the project look like?

Now, we just have our first image from the telescope. They'll do hardware commissioning for the next month or two. Once that's done, they'll do more detailed mini-surveys of the sky to determine how dim a star you can see; that's a critical element in this kind of an instrument. That's especially important in doing supernova calculations, because we want to get the most distant supernova we can possibly find, and we're limited by how far the telescope can see a star. Supernovas can also tell us information about dark energy.

The nice thing about this camera is that even though we're getting 525 nights over five years, that's only one-third of the time. And so, the scientific community gets more than two-thirds of the time on this great new camera.

During our nights, we're going to be mapping out 5,000 square degrees of the southern sky, by marching along in some fixed pattern taking pictures. Like any astronomy , it takes multiple filters and then moves to the next spot in a very simple pattern. Interspersed with that are special filters for supernovae.

What's the ultimate outcome of the Dark Energy Survey?

The best model we have for dark energy is still off by 120 orders of magnitude. What the dark energy survey can do is to either further pin down that original hypothesis, even though it can't resolve the theoretical problem, or we could find out that the model we have is wrong and the data point in a completely different direction. And I think a lot of theoretical physicists would like that because they're stuck on an idea they really don't know how to solve.

Explore further: New mass map of a distant galaxy cluster is the most precise yet

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Euclid and the geometry of the dark universe

Jun 22, 2012

Euclid, an exciting new mission to map the geometry, distribution and evolution of dark energy and dark matter has just been formally adopted by ESA as part of their Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 progamme. Name ...

Still in the dark about dark matter

Dec 06, 2011

Dark matter, the mysterious stuff thought to make up about 80 percent of matter in the universe, has become even more inscrutable.

Recommended for you

Satellite galaxies put astronomers in a spin

15 hours ago

An international team of researchers, led by astronomers at the Observatoire Astronomique de Strasbourg (CNRS/Université de Strasbourg), has studied 380 galaxies and shown that their small satellite galaxies almost always ...

Video: The diversity of habitable zones and the planets

15 hours ago

The field of exoplanets has rapidly expanded from the exclusivity of exoplanet detection to include exoplanet characterization. A key step towards this characterization is the determination of which planets occupy the Habitable ...

Ultra-deep astrophoto of the Antenna Galaxies

15 hours ago

You might think the image above of the famous Antenna Galaxies was taken by a large ground-based or even a space telescope. Think again. Amateur astronomer Rolf Wahl Olsen from New Zealand compiled a total ...

The most precise measurement of an alien world's size

16 hours ago

Thanks to NASA's Kepler and Spitzer Space Telescopes, scientists have made the most precise measurement ever of the radius of a planet outside our solar system. The size of the exoplanet, dubbed Kepler-93b, ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

geokstr
2 / 5 (8) Sep 18, 2012
There are things that we know we know, there are things that we know we don't know, and probably the largest by orders of magnitude, are the things we don't even know we don't know. (D. Rumsfeld)

My favorite statistic, which I heard decades ago, is that 99.99% of all the scientists that have ever lived in the entire history of the human race...are still alive. And we're still churning out new scientists like never before.

Some variant of Moore's law is probably applicable to scientific knowledge in general. Once we think we know what dark energy/matter are, that knowledge will probably just lead to more and bigger questions, and more questions, all the way down. It will be exciting for the young of today to watch the mysteries unfold in the next 100 years.

(cont)
geokstr
1.7 / 5 (6) Sep 18, 2012
Arthur Clark's three laws:

1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Infinion
1 / 5 (2) Sep 18, 2012
what assures us that a scientific concept is correct?

(1). The understanding correctly explains observations made.
(2). The understanding correctly predicts observations yet to be made.
(3). The understanding offers no difficulties over a long period of application.
eachus
not rated yet Sep 19, 2012
Arthur Clark's three laws:

1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.


I prefer Robert A. Heinlein's version: "Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done, and why. Then do it."
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Sep 19, 2012
1.When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong. 2.The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible. 3.Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

The only problem with this is that Clarke was a writer. Even though he was a brilliant novelist: Are you going to take the word of a novelist about science over that of a scientist about science?

Experts do get it wrong on occasion but when betting I'd listen to the experts - not to the critics writing about the experts.