Urban poor plagued by 'burdens of place'

Aug 09, 2012
A study by Michigan State University scholar Igor Vojnovic suggests the urban poor have little access to healthy food choices. Credit: Michigan State University

Most of America's urban cores were designed for walking but offer little in the way of supermarkets, healthy restaurants and other amenities for residents to walk to, according to a study led by a Michigan State University scholar.

The study is one of the first to show that residents living in declining neighborhoods want – evidenced by their willingness to travel long distances to find them. Past research has generally assumed that poor people will shop at whatever store is closest.

But compared with suburban residents, the urban poor are more overweight and must travel farther to find and access personal services, said Igor Vojnovic, associate professor of geography and lead author on the study.

"This research reveals that the lack of access to basic amenities in declining inner-city neighborhoods – what we call the 'burdens of place' – is an important variable in shaping travel and diet," Vojnovic said.

Vojnovic and colleagues studied the Lansing, Mich., area by surveying urban and suburban residents, collecting socioeconomic data and using digital mapping to plot average distances to stores, restaurants, doctors' offices, banks, skating rinks and other amenities.

Their findings, published in the Journal of Urban Design, found that poor urban residents were significantly overweight, with an average body mass index of 28.73, while wealthy suburbanites were only slightly overweight, with an average BMI of 25.05. (For adults, a BMI of 25 is considered overweight and 30 is obese.)

Other findings included:

  • Fast food restaurants were more plentiful in poor neighborhoods. In addition, residents there reported that 55 percent of all dining-out experiences were at fast food eateries, compared with only 13 percent for those in the suburbs.
  • Poor urban residents had to go nearly twice as far as suburbanites to shop at supermarkets.
  • The urban poor made about five trips per month to convenience stores (which aren't known for stocking healthy foods) compared with only one trip per month for suburbanites.
"Even though the inner cities were designed to improve access, homeowners in the wealthier suburbs were actually closer to the stores and restaurants that offer healthier foods," Vojnovic said. "In other words, opportunities depend on where you live."

During the past 30 years, urban planners and business investors have largely ignored poor communities, instead focusing policy, research and investment efforts on wealthier neighborhoods, Vojnovic said. As a result, little is known about resident behaviors in declining communities, even as the number of poor people increases in the United States, he said.

The current study shows that the fundamental principles in city planning and design that have been developed around wealthy communities do not necessarily hold in poor neighborhoods.

Meanwhile, some have advocated an "obesity tax" on unhealthy foods to help pay for the health-care system overhaul or as a policy to curtail obesity. But Vojnovic said such a tax would disproportionately burden the urban poor and noted that this population has little power to influence the location decisions of healthy food suppliers.

Vojnovic said a better option might be for states to give subsidies to major supermarket chains, serving healthy food and other needed establishments that locate in poor neighborhoods.

Explore further: Power can corrupt even the honest

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Supermarkets' power desertifies our diets

Apr 18, 2008

Urban food deserts – areas where people have low or no access to food shops – exist in major cities, according to research published in the open access publication International Journal of Health Geographics, with import ...

Recommended for you

Power can corrupt even the honest

1 hour ago

When appointing a new leader, selectors base their choice on several factors and typically look for leaders with desirable characteristics such as honesty and trustworthiness. However once leaders are in power, can we trust ...

Learning at 10 degrees north

2 hours ago

Secluded beaches, calypso music and the entertaining carnival are often what come to mind when thinking of the islands of Trinidad and Tobago. But Dal Earth Sciences students might first consider Trinidad's ...

How to find the knowns and unknowns in any research

3 hours ago

Have you ever felt overloaded by information? Ever wondered how to make sense of claims and counter-claims about a topic? With so much information out there on many different issues, how is a person new to ...

Minorities energize US consumer market, according to report

3 hours ago

The buying power of minority groups in the U.S. has reached new heights and continues to outpace cumulative inflation, according to the latest Multicultural Economy Report from the Selig Center for Economic Growth at the ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Shootist
5 / 5 (2) Aug 09, 2012
I wonder if the author has ever shopped at a supermarket in a poor area of a large city.

I used to shop at the Safeway on Minnesota Ave in NE Washington, D.C. I was spit at. I was refused service by a cashier. I was stopped, by another shopper, and asked, "why are you shopping here". My answer, "because this is where the food is". I am American but my ancestors were generally European. Everyone else, for miles, was of African descent.

The store was filthy. To buy beer, you had to find a manager to unlock a cage. There were armed guards. On one occasion, there was human feces on the floor.

If you were a stock holder of a supermarket chain, would you want your profits going into a cesspool such as this? What is the solution? I do not know. But the situation, in Northeast DC, was horrifying.
jonnyboy
Aug 09, 2012
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
pubwvj
3 / 5 (2) Aug 09, 2012
Businesses, especially small ones, need customers who can buy enough to make it worth being in a location. Government over taxes businesses, especially small businesses, making it not worth being in many locations. As an area economically declines government increases the taxes on the businesses and the income for the businesses declines making it harder to pay those taxes and break even. Eventually the businesses either leave, die or go bankrupt (there's a difference) and presto, less choice. Government leaders have only themselves to blame. In turn, citizens are voting in government that promises to take from business and give the citizens a free ride. Everybody loves someone else's money. Death spiral.
DarkHorse66
not rated yet Aug 10, 2012
The article proudly points out that he is a Michigan state scholar and duly gives us a photo of him. But why are they giving us photo of him in front of what looks suspiciously like the Sydney Harbour Bridge, Australia? There is no mention of him doing anything else (eg holiday) So what has that location got to do with the article? http://www.flickr...1754459/
Regards, DH66