'Do not track' browser push at odds with online advertisers

Aug 02, 2012 By Robert Channick

When Microsoft unveils a new version of its Web browser, users will be able to traverse the Web like always but with one significant difference: The company plans to make "do not track" the default setting.

That means Internet Explorer 10 will automatically curtail a trove of personal information garnered while users surf anything from cat videos to mommy blogs, data shared by third-party companies to serve up . The move puts Microsoft out in front of a process to set new Internet privacy standards and puts it at odds with the $31 billion online advertising industry.

"Targeted advertising sells for 2 1/2 times as much as nontargeted advertising. It's very effective," said Mike Zaneis, and general counsel for the . "When a browser like Microsoft comes in and sets (do not track) by default, they just gave everybody a 60 percent off coupon for our product. We can't survive in that world."

Facing increasing pressure to get ahead of potentially more restrictive legislation, the industry has been struggling to reach consensus for an online privacy standard. In 2011, the , which sets Internet protocols, put together a working group consisting of companies, privacy advocates and experts that met for the fifth time in June at .'s headquarters in Bellevue, Wash.

Some participants said the group should be able to hammer out a standard privacy policy by the end of the year, but schisms remain. One thing that most agree upon is that making "do not track" a default setting will not be part of their final recommendations. Microsoft's proposed default setting bucks slowly building momentum for an "opt-out" solution.

"It seems clear to me that the Microsoft position, while it may be more protective of , is not a consensus position within the industry," said Chairman Jon Leibowitz.

"Do not track" follows the trail blazed by "do not call," the 2003 federal law that empowered the FTC to create a national registry for consumers to opt out of unsolicited telemarketing calls. The FTC is calling on the digital industry to take a number of online privacy measures, including a "do not track" option.

"The marketplace needs to decide this, and we're letting them," Leibowitz said. "We have not proffered a proposal, other than calling for a 'do not track' option that would be an opt out with limits on collection, with certain exceptions."

Efforts to develop an online privacy standard have failed to keep pace with the technology itself, which has fueled explosive growth in tracking and targeting Web users with "interest-based" advertising.

A report issued in June by Krux Digital showed data collection was up 400 percent year over year, with an average of 50 collection events per page view. Much of that growth comes from online media exchanges, which use real-time bidding platforms to sell targeted ads to individual Web users. Real-time bidding, a segment that barely existed three years ago, is on pace to represent more than a quarter of all U.S. digital display advertising spending by 2015, said Gordon McLeod, president of Krux, a 2-year-old data management company.

Targeted advertising commands a higher price and, some would argue, provides a more satisfying experience for consumers, who receive product offers they might actually be interested in.

"What a consumer benefits from with having their behavior followed is having things that are relevant to them coming up in their advertising experience," said Jason Wadler, executive vice president of Evanston, Ill.-based Leapfrog Online, a direct response marketing company. "If you don't have the ability to target an individual or target a consumer segment, then you are going to see just a whole bunch of random ads that you don't care about, and that's not a good experience."

Tracking has nonetheless raised concern among and regulators that perhaps too much information is being shared without consumer consent.

"This is how we buy our financial products, this is how we search health information, this is how our kids contact their friends," said Jeffrey Chester, a member of the industry group studying the issue and executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, which focuses on consumer protection and privacy issues. "Companies are able to identify you by race, by income, by health concerns. There's a lot of sensitive data out there that an individual should have more control of. Right now, an individual has no control."

A majority of Web users disapprove of their personal information being collected for targeted advertising. A Pew Internet study released in March found that 68 percent of all Internet users were opposed to targeted advertising because they didn't want their online behavior tracked and analyzed.

The same study showed that just 38 percent of users knew how to limit online data collection. Given the hodgepodge of existing solutions, that is not surprising.

The Digital Advertising Alliance, a consortium of trade groups, launched its own opt-out program two years ago, a circuitous journey that starts with a small triangular ad choices icon that marketers can embed in their ads. Clicking leads users to a notice page written by the third-party company serving the ad. Within that page is a link to a consumer opt-out site, where users can tell up to 108 participating advertising companies to stop tracking and targeting them. More than 2 million users have opted out to date, Zaneis said.

Flagging "do not track" on a Web browser might be a simpler way to deliver the message to all advertisers, but compliance remains voluntary at this point. The three leading browsers - Internet Explorer, Mozilla's Firefox and Google's Chrome - all offer users an opt-out for tracking.

"Right now, ("do not track") flags mean nothing, because there's no definition for what 'do not track' means," Zaneis said.

While some industry observers believe Microsoft will reverse its position, a company spokeswoman said last week that "do not track" was still on track as a default setting when the new Explorer makes its expected debut this fall.

"By enabling the 'do not track' feature as the default setting in Internet Explorer 10, we're providing our customers more control over how their online behavior is tracked, shared and used," the spokeswoman said.

Analysts see the decision as a shrewd way for Microsoft to appeal to privacy-conscious consumers and take a bite out of rivals such as Google's Chrome browser, which has grown quickly and has about 20 percent of the market. That compares with Internet Explorer's 54 percent, according to NetMarketshare.com. Google, an advertising-reliant company, has more to lose in a nontracking environment.

Because Microsoft is likely going beyond the forthcoming industry privacy standard, advertisers will have no obligation to honor the default setting for IE 10 users since it will be "noncompliant," Zaneis said. Privacy experts say they would fight such a move.

The debate over "do not track" methodology may not be fully settled until legislation supplants industry self-regulation. With technology continuing to race ahead of policy deliberations, privacy issues may be more complex going forward.

"Technology is way ahead of much of the public debate about what's appropriate and necessary," McLeod said.

Explore further: Second apparent leak of hacked celebrity nude pictures: US media

5 /5 (3 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Regulators, ad companies huddle over 'Do Not Track' features

Apr 12, 2012

The momentum of a growing multibillion-dollar industry is colliding with online privacy worries this week, as regulators and privacy advocates face off against the Internet advertising industry to hash out how proposed "Do ...

Microsoft's privacy-by-default in IE10 sparks opposition

Jun 04, 2012

(Phys.org) -- The Internet browser headache in having to initiate an opt-out exit from advertisers who keep landing on your pages because they think they have a plausible target has turned a corner. Microsoft ...

FTC proposes 'Do Not Track' tool for Web surfers (Update 2)

Dec 01, 2010

(AP) -- Federal regulators are proposing to create a "Do Not Track" tool for the Internet so that consumers could prevent marketers from tracking their Web browsing habits and other online behavior in order to target advertising.

Microsoft unveils new privacy feature for IE

Dec 07, 2010

An upcoming version of Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer browser will let users add lists of sites that they don't want tracking them, a peace offering amid uproar over the sneaky ways that websites watch ...

Internet privacy controls challenge tech industry

Jul 26, 2011

The federal government has put Google, Microsoft, Apple and other technology companies on notice: Give consumers a way prevent advertisers from tracking their movements across the Web - or face regulation.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
4 / 5 (4) Aug 02, 2012
That product is espionage. Spying on the personal habits of individuals.

"When a browser like Microsoft comes in and sets (do not track) by default, they just gave everybody a 60 percent off coupon for our product." - Article

Corporate filth.
Shifty0x88
not rated yet Aug 02, 2012
Everyone realizes that "Do Not Track" as of right now is just a suggestions, and there is no real consequence of tracking you even if you have Firefox (which has had Do Not Track for a while), and now IE10 with Do Not Track enabled.

It is just another field in the header of your HTML get/post request, and the web server, and therefore the web admin and the company can either ignore it or choose to follow it.

I just hope everyone realizes that this really isn't going to do much other then make you feel better

Vendicar_Decarian
3.7 / 5 (3) Aug 02, 2012
Oh come on. Everyone knows that voluntary adherence to ethical standards is guaranteed to be successful.

After all, it is the basis of so many Republican Economic Policies from banking Regulation to Arms export policies.
LuckyExplorer
3 / 5 (2) Aug 03, 2012
"...We can't survive in that world."

NONSENS: All companies have the same preconditions. - IN FACT NOTHING CHANGES

But privacy is much better

One of the rare good decisions of MS
smartninja
1 / 5 (1) Aug 03, 2012
Great! Now users of Internet Explorer will see irrelevant ads. All because they are paranoid and have no idea what aggregate data is. Seriously though, nobody uses that old crapware anymore, right?