A star’s dying scream may be a beacon for physics

Aug 14, 2012 By Jason Major

When a star suffered an untimely demise at the hands of a hidden black hole, astronomers detected its doleful, ululating wail — in the key of D-sharp, no less — from 3.9 billion light-years away. The resulting ultraluminous X-ray blast revealed the supermassive black hole’s presence at the center of a distant galaxy in March of 2011, and now that information could be used to study the real-life workings of black holes, general relativity, and a concept first proposed by Einstein in 1915.

Within the centers of many spiral galaxies (including our own) lie the undisputed monsters of the Universe: incredibly dense supermassive , containing the equivalent masses of millions of Suns packed into areas smaller than the diameter of Mercury’s orbit. While some supermassive black holes (SMBHs) surround themselves with enormous orbiting disks of superheated material that will eventually spiral inwards to feed their insatiable appetites — all the while emitting ostentatious amounts of high-energy radiation in the process — others lurk in the darkness, perfectly camouflaged against the blackness of space and lacking such brilliant banquet spreads. If any object should find itself too close to one of these so-called “inactive” stellar corpses, it would be ripped to shreds by the intense tidal forces created by the black hole’s gravity, its material becoming an X-ray-bright accretion disk and particle jet for a brief time.

Such an event occurred in March 2011, when scientists using NASA’s Swift telescope detected a sudden flare of X-rays from a source located nearly 4 billion light-years away in the constellation Draco. The flare, called Swift J1644+57, showed the likely location of a supermassive black hole in a distant galaxy, a black hole that had until then remained hidden until a star ventured too close and became an easy meal.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The resulting particle jet, created by material from the star that got caught up in the black hole’s intense magnetic field lines and was blown out into space in our direction (at 80-90% the speed of light!) is what initially attracted astronomers’ attention. But further research on Swift J1644+57 with other telescopes has revealed new information about the black hole and what happens when a star meets its end.

In particular, researchers have identified what’s called a quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) embedded inside the accretion disk of Swift J1644+57. Warbling at 5 mhz, in effect it’s the low-frequency cry of a murdered star. Created by fluctuations in the frequencies of X-ray emissions, such a source near the event horizon of a supermassive black hole can provide clues to what’s happening in that poorly-understood region close to a black hole’s point-of-no-return.

Einstein’s theory of proposes that space itself around a massive rotating object — like a planet, star, or, in an extreme instance, a supermassive black hole — is dragged along for the ride (the Lense-Thirring effect.) While this is difficult to detect around less massive bodies a rapidly-rotating black hole would create a much more pronounced effect… and with a QPO as a benchmark within the SMBH’s disk the resulting precession of the Lense-Thirring effect could, theoretically, be measured.

If anything, further investigations of Swift J1644+57 could provide insight to the mechanics of general relativity in distant parts of the Universe, as well as billions of years in the past.

Explore further: Astronomers measure weight of galaxies, expansion of universe

More information: arxiv.org/pdf/1208.1046v1.pdf

Related Stories

Star's 'cry' heralds new era for testing relativity

Aug 02, 2012

(Phys.org) -- Last year, astronomers discovered a quiescent black hole in a distant galaxy that erupted after shredding and consuming a passing star. Now researchers have identified a distinctive X-ray signal ...

Image: Black hole caught in a stellar homicide

Jul 12, 2012

(Phys.org) -- This computer-simulated image shows gas from a star that is ripped apart by tidal forces as it falls into a black hole. Some of the gas also is being ejected at high speeds into space.

Astronomers calculate mass of largest black hole yet

Jan 14, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Weighing 6.6 billion solar masses, the black hole at the center of galaxy M87 is the most massive black hole for which a precise mass has been measured. Using the Frederick C. Gillett Gemini ...

Black hole came from a shredded galaxy

Feb 15, 2012

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope have found a cluster of young, blue stars encircling the first intermediate-mass black hole ever discovered. The presence of the star cluster ...

How do supermassive black holes get so big?

Apr 26, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- At the center of most galaxies lie supermassive black holes that can grow to become more than a billion times larger than our Sun. However, astrophysicists don’t fully understand the formation ...

Recommended for you

Evidence of a local hot bubble carved by a supernova

7 hours ago

I spent this past weekend backpacking in Rocky Mountain National Park, where although the snow-swept peaks and the dangerously close wildlife were staggering, the night sky stood in triumph. Without a fire, ...

Astronomers measure weight of galaxies, expansion of universe

15 hours ago

Astronomers at the University of British Columbia have collaborated with international researchers to calculate the precise mass of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies, dispelling the notion that the two galaxies have similar ...

Mysterious molecules in space

Jul 29, 2014

Over the vast, empty reaches of interstellar space, countless small molecules tumble quietly though the cold vacuum. Forged in the fusion furnaces of ancient stars and ejected into space when those stars ...

Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Jul 28, 2014

What an awesome photo! Italian amateur astronomer Rolando Ligustri nailed it earlier today using a remote telescope in New Mexico and wide-field 4-inch (106 mm) refractor. Currently the brightest comet in ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DarkHorse66
not rated yet Aug 14, 2012
5 mhz: 5 millihertz? Can we even measure that low? Or should that have read 5Mhz? Especially since this is supposed to be a fluctuation in the frequencies of Xray emissions? Xray is at (roughly) 10^17 to 10^18 Hertz.
http://en.wikiped...trum.png
http://en.wikiped...spectrum
Regards, DH66
barakn
5 / 5 (1) Aug 14, 2012
You can flip a light switch on and off at 1 hertz even though the average frequency of the light is 5 x 10^14 Hz.
Infinion
1 / 5 (2) Aug 14, 2012
It kind of seems like the x-rays emitted from the black hole were only observable once the hot plasma from the consumed sun began to orbit it.

the mechanism i'm comparing it to is the compression of an electrically conducting filament by magnetic forces, i.e this wiki page http://en.wikiped...ysics%29

it's just an observation, could anyone confirm this as a possible mechanism to explain the black hole's x-ray emissions or is this more appropriate in the physics forum?
Tektrix
5 / 5 (5) Aug 14, 2012
5 mhz: 5 millihertz? Can we even measure that low? Or should that have read 5Mhz?


Nope, it's really .oo5 Hz (see the linked arxiv paper.) And yes, we can measure oscillations of these, and much longer periods.
mansie
5 / 5 (3) Aug 14, 2012
"Such an event occurred in March 2011"

It didn't though - it was detected in March 2011. Sorry to be a pedant about this.
madsam
not rated yet Aug 15, 2012
"Such an event occurred in March 2011"

It didn't though - it was detected in March 2011. Sorry to be a pedant about this.


Time is relative
Feldagast
not rated yet Aug 19, 2012
"Such an event occurred in March 2011"

It didn't though - it was detected in March 2011. Sorry to be a pedant about this.


Time is relative


Time is your uncle?
Tachyon8491
2.8 / 5 (4) Aug 19, 2012
Apart from the mention of the star's "dying cry" being in "D-Sharp" on physorg's main page, there is no further explication of this. I was intrigued by both the initial assertion and its later omission. Now the "D" in D-sharp implies D-sharp major, which is a redundant tonality with nine sharps (containing f-double sharp and c-double sharp) and enharmonically equivalent to E-Flat Major, which is why we don't use D-sharp major. Anyway, from the initial assertion one needs to assume that the selected harmonic series evident in the "fluctuations in the frequencies of X-ray emissions" triggered the interpreters of these signals to see these as analogising the general structure of a major scale - not necessarily D-sharp or E-flat, but the general two-tetrachord architecture of a major scale. As a professional musician, it beats me how they could equate this specifically to a recognised pitch. That there are parallels to musical structure in cosmic ontogeny I have recognised for decades.